BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Harry Krause the Draft Dodger? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/91803-harry-krause-draft-dodger.html)

Tim March 5th 08 01:32 PM

Loogy blows his nose here again
 
On Mar 5, 7:29*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 5:11 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
om...
"John H." wrote in message
news:8adrs3t5sr4a9olmlfeihhufcce8iui55n@4ax. com...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
*changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
* * * * *John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....
Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...;)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies......
For you to get along with me, I'd have to want to get along with you.
For the most part, I don't associate with dumb turds like you. So, there
is little chance you would "get along with" me.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


How refined and cultured.....- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I take it you just can't help it?

John H.[_3_] March 5th 08 01:35 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself.

Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his
'HK', which is more than enough.

Tim March 5th 08 01:39 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?


Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about *boats.


Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?


Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.


Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?


Just a thought


Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself.

Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his
'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first
column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see
what I'm talking about.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d&

HK March 5th 08 01:39 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought




I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


HK March 5th 08 01:42 PM

Herring in attack mode, as usual.
 
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself.

Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his
'HK', which is more than enough.


John H.[_3_] March 5th 08 01:54 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?


Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about *boats.


Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?


Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.


Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?


Just a thought


Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself.

Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his
'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first
column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see
what I'm talking about.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d&


Damn!

I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you
up, but it's an old version.

HK March 5th 08 01:56 PM

Herring pimps for Agent
 
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Mar 5, 7:35 am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?
Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.
Why, Harry?
I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?
Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.
Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?
Just a thought
Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself.

Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his
'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first
column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see
what I'm talking about.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d&


Damn!

I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you
up, but it's an old version.


HK March 5th 08 02:37 PM

Florida Jim morphs into attack dog
 
JimH wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK
wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK
wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had
high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry
asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry
owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that
kept him off
the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of
people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I
don't
blame
them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as
quickly as
anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst
wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go
fight it.
And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of
losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my
draft
status
changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly
never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got
drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and
answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip
three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and
blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay
home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft
dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you,
Booger,
Herring and Reggie....
Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his
past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not
grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow
to
melt...;)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant
lies.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a
story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think
it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being
interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said
simply:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you
it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here
is acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. ;-)

It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same
dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His
straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness
you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want
to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried
to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was
counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any
in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with
a wind up mouth. I give up.
I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you
(Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking
about your knowledge of marine engines.

Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong.

You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of
changing your handle a couple of times.

Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or
Reggie.

I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff
than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his
butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I
value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite.



You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya!




Hmmm. I don't recall Florida Jim having any special knowledge of marine
engines.

Eisboch March 5th 08 02:47 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 

"Tim" wrote in message
...

John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first
column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see
what I'm talking about.



Methinks somebody is playing games with his computer.
And it's not Harry.

Eisboch





Eisboch March 5th 08 02:48 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 

"HK" wrote in message
...


I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings.
If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into
"attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


Guess maybe I was wrong.
Surprised, but wrong.

Eisboch



Tim March 5th 08 02:52 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 


HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought




I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no
intellect, with kindergarten behaviour.

I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that...

Tim March 5th 08 02:56 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 


Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
penned the following well considered
thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


|I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
|while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
|too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
|melt...;)

I can think of three "harms."

1) Newbies take one look at this (and run away)... they don't know
this has been going on for decades..... and that there really isn't as
much hate flowing as is immediately apparent.... that some of the
"combatants" actually know (and fish and boat with) each other outside
of this little virtual section of life.

2) Even with cabin fever closing in, there must be *something* more
imbued with good karma that all of this sniping.

3) It encourages boatless trolls who have no interest in ever
contributing anything positive or of boating content. Unlike the rest
of you, even with the coming warm weather, they aren't going to become
any more worth reading or responding to than they are, now.

My $.02

--


Thank you, Gene.

I agree 100%

Tim March 5th 08 02:59 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 


Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...


I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings.
If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into
"attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


Guess maybe I was wrong.
Surprised, but wrong.

Eisboch




Yes, Richard.
interesting, yet disapointing.

HK March 5th 08 03:03 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
Tim wrote:

HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought



I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no
intellect, with kindergarten behaviour.

I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that...



Tell you what...*you* jump on the trashmeisters here every time they
dump, and I'll just sit back and watch.

N.L. Eckert March 5th 08 03:04 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran.
=================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent
58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally
screwed up.
90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but,
no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send.


HK March 5th 08 03:19 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran.
=================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent
58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally
screwed up.
90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but,
no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send.



Johnson *and* Nixon. It was the dumbest U.S. military engagement of the
20th Century, and now we are engaged in an equally dumb military
engagement. We never seem to learn.

Tim March 5th 08 03:22 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 


Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:25:11 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:57:19 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:06:52 -0500, "secretagent"
wrote:

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist
of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls.
And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should
believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

It was 40+ years ago - a whole different lifetime.

I'm not defending Harry, but get a freakin' life.

Nobody cares anymore.


I got out of the service almost 20 years ago. Yet Harry receives no flak
for his derogatory comments about same, whether mine or anyone else's.


Because it doesn't matter what Harry thinks.

It's as simple as that.

You served honorably, went above and beyond the call making it a
career and rose to Staff command level.

Why should you care what he thinks? He can make all the idiotic
comments he wants - he has no clue what you had to sacrifice or the
effort made to achieve your Staff level rank.

The only way that achievement can be taken away from you is for you to
take it away from yourself. If you react to his taunts, then he wins
and you look foolish.

I was just a grunt - dumbass Marine, but I would think that an officer
and a gentleman would understand when he's being played and just
ignore it.

Then again, maybe not.

Share the wealth, Tom.


I just did.


HooRahhhh!

+1

[email protected] March 5th 08 03:30 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 
On Mar 5, 7:22*am, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:





On Mar 4, 8:29*pm, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:04 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
wrote:


On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message


m...


"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote:
N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off
the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as
anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it.
And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers.....
Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft
status
*changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never
"dodged"
the draft.
Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted?
Dear Dumb John:
You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered.
It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****
* * * * *John H
He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?
I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....


Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -
I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
melt...;)


Sparring with soft butter is much more fun, and more mentally stimulating.


We just *know* where you slather on that soft butter, and there is no
question for you it is more stimulating.


Do you three think of nothing else?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults
thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were
better than that...


You don't qualify to be one of the 'you three' mentioned! That comment was
to Harry and his two sidekicks, who manage to find sexual innuendos in
aircraft carriers.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I looked at the posts a bunch of times, only saw me and two otheres..
But I understand now.. did not think I had gotten so gross with any of
my folly;)

[email protected] March 5th 08 03:34 PM

Harry wants me...
 
On Mar 5, 8:23*am, wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:27*pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 10:05*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here


wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote:


*"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========


Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you it is
a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is
acceptable.


That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.


Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. *


Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are
not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I
do however respect the freedom of speech of others here...


I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck
posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a
personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when
many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept
on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that
was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize.


* JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal
threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking
members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments,
about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or
his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a
lively debate.


JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many
hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments
about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and
make more lies about other people insulting his wife.


It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Dude really did all that, holy ****....??- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Yes, he did, and worse. How ya feeling, by the way?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I think I might have finally broken the infection. Lungs started
clearing yesterday for the first time in over a month. I feel like I
am getting a breath again.. I am still pretty shell shocked though,
afraid to go outside in the rain and **** today.. I really shouldn't
have worked at the stables, man I really miss it...

[email protected] March 5th 08 03:35 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Mar 5, 8:28*am, Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about *boats.

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)

[email protected] March 5th 08 03:39 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 
On Mar 5, 9:39*am, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST),
penned the following well considered
thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
|while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it
|too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to
|melt...;)

I can think of three "harms."

1) Newbies take one look at this (and run away)... they don't know
this has been going on for decades..... and that there really isn't as
much hate flowing as is immediately apparent.... that some of the
"combatants" actually know (and fish and boat with) each other outside
of this little virtual section of life.

2) Even with cabin fever closing in, there must be *something* more
imbued with good karma that all of this sniping.

3) It encourages boatless trolls who have no interest in ever
contributing anything positive or of boating content. Unlike the rest
of you, even with the coming warm weather, they aren't going to become
any more worth reading or responding to than they are, now.

My $.02

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Noted.... will be considered...

HK March 5th 08 03:44 PM

Florida Jim morphs into attack dog
 
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"secretagent" wrote in message
...
"JimH" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:

- Show quoted text -
But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a
story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I
think
it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being
interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said
simply:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you
it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members
here is acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. ;-)

It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same
dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His
straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness
you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You
want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him.
I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work.
I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't
find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an
empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up.
I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you
(Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking
about your knowledge of marine engines.

Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong.

You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of
changing your handle a couple of times.

Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring
or Reggie.

I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff
than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up
his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really
think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite.


You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya!


Hmmm. I don't recall Florida Jim having any special knowledge of marine
engines.


I could be mistaken. I thought it was a Jim who lived in Florida.




We have an infrequent visitor here from Florida who is a top-notch
outboard mechanic by trade, but he's no Jim. :)


Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] March 5th 08 04:22 PM

Harry wants me...
 
wrote:


- Show quoted text -


I think I might have finally broken the infection. Lungs started
clearing yesterday for the first time in over a month. I feel like I
am getting a breath again.. I am still pretty shell shocked though,
afraid to go outside in the rain and **** today.. I really shouldn't
have worked at the stables, man I really miss it...


So now you will just need to go fishing (ie slinging ****) in place of
shoveling ****.

[email protected] March 5th 08 04:22 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"secretagent" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"secretagent" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:

"secretagent" wrote in message

.. .

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK
wrote:

N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had
high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry
asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry
owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and that
kept him off
the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of
people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I
don't
blame
them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as
quickly as
anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst
wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go
fight it.
And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of
losers.....

Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my
draft
status
changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly
never
"dodged"
the draft.

Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got
drafted?

Dear Dumb John:

You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and
answered.

It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip
three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and
blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay
home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft
dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you,
Booger,
Herring and Reggie....

Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his
past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not
grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes
it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow
to
melt...;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant
lies.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a
story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think
it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being
interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said
simply:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you
it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here
is acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off
American Idol............. ;-)

It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same
dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His
straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness
you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want
to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I
tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I
was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't
find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty
head with a wind up mouth. I give up.

I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you
(Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking
about your knowledge of marine engines.

Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong.

You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of
changing your handle a couple of times.

Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or
Reggie.

I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff
than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his
butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I
value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite.



You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya!

Now that smarts. If you buttholes keep fanning the flames, It will never
end.


Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] March 5th 08 04:24 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
wrote:

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)


Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all
your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.

;)



HK March 5th 08 04:25 PM

Pot & Kettle in One Guy!
 
wrote:

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"secretagent" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"secretagent" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote:
On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote:





On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote:

"secretagent" wrote in message

.. .

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK
wrote:

N.L. Eckert wrote:
Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era
had high draft
lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH!
If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry
asserts that
his
name was "removed from the list".
Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why
Harry owes you or
anybody else an explanation.
==================================
He once told me that he had a college deferment and
that kept him off
the list for that time. That was the case with a lot
of people at
the
time, including my district manager. And, you know
what? I don't
blame
them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as
quickly as
anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the
worst wars
imaginable and the expected the youth of the country
to go fight it.
And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of
losers.....

Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and
my draft
status
changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly
never
"dodged"
the draft.

Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got
drafted?

Dear Dumb John:

You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked
and answered.

It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip
three-fourths of
a
post before replying.
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H

He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and
blessed by a
twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to
stay home with
the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a
draft dodger. I
guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he?

I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to
you, Booger,
Herring and Reggie....

Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his
past/present life?
I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but
not grown men.
You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up
for a
while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he
likes it
too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the
snow to
melt...;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant
lies.....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a
story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I
think
it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being
interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said
simply:

"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think
about it...
=========

Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To
you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking
members here is acceptable.

That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter.

Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn
off American Idol............. ;-)

It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact
same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago.
His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The
nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy
himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or
get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but
apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum
of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to
get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I
give up.

I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you
(Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was
talking about your knowledge of marine engines.

Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong.

You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme
of changing your handle a couple of times.

Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger,
Herring or Reggie.

I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more
stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your
nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you
really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed
bugs bite.



You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya!

Now that smarts. If you buttholes keep fanning the flames, It will never
end.


HK March 5th 08 04:26 PM

Reggie shovels it.
 
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:


- Show quoted text -


I think I might have finally broken the infection. Lungs started
clearing yesterday for the first time in over a month. I feel like I
am getting a breath again.. I am still pretty shell shocked though,
afraid to go outside in the rain and **** today.. I really shouldn't
have worked at the stables, man I really miss it...


So now you will just need to go fishing (ie slinging ****) in place of
shoveling ****.


HK March 5th 08 04:27 PM

Reggie keeps stirring it up...
 
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
wrote:

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)


Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all
your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.

;)



[email protected] March 5th 08 04:49 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran. =================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called


Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and
ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please.


HK March 5th 08 04:57 PM

'Jim in Florida' just can't help himself.
 
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran. =================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called


Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and
ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please.


You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole.
Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that your
fantasy?

[email protected] March 5th 08 05:07 PM

Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran. =================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called


Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and
ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please.


You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole.
Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that your
fantasy?


Hey. Don't look at me. Someone else said it. I just changed the wording to
suit you. Quit changing the subject line. You're confusing everyone.


HK March 5th 08 05:09 PM

Florida Jim's Obsession
 
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran. =================================
The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called

Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned
and ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please.


You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole.
Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that
your fantasy?


Hey. Don't look at me. Someone else said it. I just changed the wording
to suit you. Quit changing the subject line. You're confusing everyone.


John H.[_3_] March 5th 08 05:22 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought


Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)


Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all
your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.

;)


Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.

So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.

[email protected] March 5th 08 06:33 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Mar 5, 12:22*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is





Here wrote:
wrote:


Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?


Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.


Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?


Just a thought


Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)


Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. *Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. *His personality disorder is all
your fault. *Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.


;)


Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.

So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You could just ask Harry himself..........
But he'd just lie about as usual....

Reginald P. Smithers III[_9_] March 5th 08 06:41 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought
Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)

Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all
your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.

;)


Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.

So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.


yes, until "Just" came here, we never had any problems with the group,
it was like one big happy family. "Cumbayaa my friends"

"Just" should be ashamed of himself. ;)


[email protected] March 5th 08 06:55 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 
On Mar 5, 1:41*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:


wrote:


Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?


Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.


Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?


Just a thought
Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)
Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. *Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. *His personality disorder is all
your fault. *Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.


;)


Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.


So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.


yes, until "Just" came here, we never had any problems with the group,
it was like one big happy family. *"Cumbayaa my friends"

"Just" should be ashamed of himself. ;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Bailiff, whack his pee pee..

HK March 5th 08 07:57 PM

Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on
 
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote:

wrote:

Why, Harry?

I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought
Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political
posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;)

Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry
was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all
your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out.

;)


Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.

So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.


John H.[_3_] March 5th 08 09:19 PM

Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on
 
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:57:34 -0500, HK wrote:

Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.

Tim March 5th 08 09:22 PM

What are you doing, Harry?
 


HK wrote:
Tim wrote:

HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread?

Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you
changed it to
1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then
2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers",
3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers"
4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers"
5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new"
6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring"
7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin"
8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra"
9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida"
10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida"
11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida
12) More nastiness from 'Reggie'
13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness
14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences
15) Herring plays kissy-face
16) Herring claims he can't stand himself.
17) Herring: nothng about boats.

Why, Harry?


I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have
filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a
thread like this?

Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of
which you would claim to be.
I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not
of a person of any type of educational or professional standard.

Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to?

Just a thought



I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the
postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go
into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding
relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all!


I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no
intellect, with kindergarten behaviour.

I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that...



Tell you what...*you* jump on the trashmeisters here every time they
dump, and I'll just sit back and watch.


Well, that would be fine, but I don't jump on trash piles. Not saying
I haven't in the past, but I try to avoid confrontation, because it
turns into nothing but harrassment with no construction.

HK March 5th 08 09:30 PM

Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on (he can'tcontrol himself)
 
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:57:34 -0500, HK wrote:

Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post
about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else
that could be considered derogatory.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com