![]() |
Loogy blows his nose here again
On Mar 5, 7:29*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Mar 4, 5:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message om... "John H." wrote in message news:8adrs3t5sr4a9olmlfeihhufcce8iui55n@4ax. com... On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't blame them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status *changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** * * * * *John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies...... For you to get along with me, I'd have to want to get along with you. For the most part, I don't associate with dumb turds like you. So, there is little chance you would "get along with" me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How refined and cultured.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I take it you just can't help it? |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about *boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& |
What are you doing, Harry?
Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! |
Herring in attack mode, as usual.
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Mar 5, 7:35*am, John H. wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about *boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& Damn! I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you up, but it's an old version. |
Herring pimps for Agent
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:39:04 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 5, 7:35 am, John H. wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:28:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Tim, I think he's trying to make a name for himself. Somehow, I haven't seen most of those titles. All I've been seeing is his 'HK', which is more than enough.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...5d6?scoring=d& Damn! I'm glad I've got Agent. If you want it, let me know. I think I can fix you up, but it's an old version. |
Florida Jim morphs into attack dog
JimH wrote:
"secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I don't blame them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said simply: "It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. ;-) It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up. I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you (Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking about your knowledge of marine engines. Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong. You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of changing your handle a couple of times. Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or Reggie. I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite. You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya! Hmmm. I don't recall Florida Jim having any special knowledge of marine engines. |
What are you doing, Harry?
"Tim" wrote in message ... John here's whe us gold fish see: in the upper right of the first column, click sort by date, then follow the thread down, you'll see what I'm talking about. Methinks somebody is playing games with his computer. And it's not Harry. Eisboch |
What are you doing, Harry?
"HK" wrote in message ... I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! Guess maybe I was wrong. Surprised, but wrong. Eisboch |
What are you doing, Harry?
HK wrote: Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no intellect, with kindergarten behaviour. I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that... |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
|
What are you doing, Harry?
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! Guess maybe I was wrong. Surprised, but wrong. Eisboch Yes, Richard. interesting, yet disapointing. |
What are you doing, Harry?
Tim wrote:
HK wrote: Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no intellect, with kindergarten behaviour. I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that... Tell you what...*you* jump on the trashmeisters here every time they dump, and I'll just sit back and watch. |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he
turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent 58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally screwed up. 90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but, no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send. |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
N.L. Eckert wrote:
He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called and sent 58,000 GIs to their deaths and uncounted men wounded and mentally screwed up. 90% or more of the "country" was violently opposed to the Nam war, but, no matter, Uncle Lyndon had plenty of cannon fodder to send. Johnson *and* Nixon. It was the dumbest U.S. military engagement of the 20th Century, and now we are engaged in an equally dumb military engagement. We never seem to learn. |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:25:11 -0500, John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:57:19 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:06:52 -0500, "secretagent" wrote: He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? It was 40+ years ago - a whole different lifetime. I'm not defending Harry, but get a freakin' life. Nobody cares anymore. I got out of the service almost 20 years ago. Yet Harry receives no flak for his derogatory comments about same, whether mine or anyone else's. Because it doesn't matter what Harry thinks. It's as simple as that. You served honorably, went above and beyond the call making it a career and rose to Staff command level. Why should you care what he thinks? He can make all the idiotic comments he wants - he has no clue what you had to sacrifice or the effort made to achieve your Staff level rank. The only way that achievement can be taken away from you is for you to take it away from yourself. If you react to his taunts, then he wins and you look foolish. I was just a grunt - dumbass Marine, but I would think that an officer and a gentleman would understand when he's being played and just ignore it. Then again, maybe not. Share the wealth, Tom. I just did. HooRahhhh! +1 |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
On Mar 5, 7:22*am, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:38:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Mar 4, 8:29*pm, John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:01:04 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message m... "John H." wrote in message om... On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. *That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? *I don't blame them one damn bit!! * I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. *Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? * There was no winner, *only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status *changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** * * * * *John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. *Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;) Sparring with soft butter is much more fun, and more mentally stimulating. We just *know* where you slather on that soft butter, and there is no question for you it is more stimulating. Do you three think of nothing else?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - To suggest that I have ever engaged in the sexually perverted insults thrown around here is dishonest, nothing less... I thought you were better than that... You don't qualify to be one of the 'you three' mentioned! That comment was to Harry and his two sidekicks, who manage to find sexual innuendos in aircraft carriers.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I looked at the posts a bunch of times, only saw me and two otheres.. But I understand now.. did not think I had gotten so gross with any of my folly;) |
Harry wants me...
On Mar 5, 8:23*am, wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:27*pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 10:05*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: On Mar 4, 8:00 pm, "JimH" wrote: *"It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. *To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. * Uh, no I don't. I rarely argue, I try to debate. Personal attacks are not my forte either (except for drunken joe who I truly dislike).. I do however respect the freedom of speech of others here... I do think it is funny that JimH who has made up lies about Chuck posting his home phone number just so he could argue and launch a personal attach on Chuck is lecturing you about arguing. * Even when many people stated that Chuck never posted his telephone, JimH just kept on lying, only when someone posted a photo of the original web page that was saved on his server, did JimH suddenly decide to apologize. * JimH, the guy who insisted Harry was stalking him and making personal threats to him and his wife, is now wondering if personal attacking members is acceptable. *While Harry has made many derogatory comments, about many people, he never stalked JimH nor made any threats to him or his wife. *This is the guy who wants to slap your wrist about having a lively debate. JimH the guy who has pulled Bassy/Loogy strings for years and many hundreds of post, by making insulting and derogatory personal comments about Bassy/Loggy's wife and family, now wants to play the martyr, and make more lies about other people insulting his wife. It is funny watching JimH, he really is an interesting "character".- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dude really did all that, holy ****....??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, he did, and worse. How ya feeling, by the way?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think I might have finally broken the infection. Lungs started clearing yesterday for the first time in over a month. I feel like I am getting a breath again.. I am still pretty shell shocked though, afraid to go outside in the rain and **** today.. I really shouldn't have worked at the stables, man I really miss it... |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Mar 5, 8:28*am, Tim wrote:
Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) *"Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) *"More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about *boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;) |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
On Mar 5, 9:39*am, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:28:58 -0800 (PST), penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a |while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it |too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to |melt...;) I can think of three "harms." 1) Newbies take one look at this (and run away)... they don't know this has been going on for decades..... and that there really isn't as much hate flowing as is immediately apparent.... that some of the "combatants" actually know (and fish and boat with) each other outside of this little virtual section of life. 2) Even with cabin fever closing in, there must be *something* more imbued with good karma that all of this sniping. 3) It encourages boatless trolls who have no interest in ever contributing anything positive or of boating content. Unlike the rest of you, even with the coming warm weather, they aren't going to become any more worth reading or responding to than they are, now. My $.02 -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Noted.... will be considered... |
Florida Jim morphs into attack dog
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... JimH wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: - Show quoted text - But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said simply: "It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. ;-) It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up. I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you (Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking about your knowledge of marine engines. Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong. You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of changing your handle a couple of times. Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or Reggie. I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite. You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya! Hmmm. I don't recall Florida Jim having any special knowledge of marine engines. I could be mistaken. I thought it was a Jim who lived in Florida. We have an infrequent visitor here from Florida who is a top-notch outboard mechanic by trade, but he's no Jim. :) |
Harry wants me...
|
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
"JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message .. . "John H." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I don't blame them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said simply: "It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. ;-) It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up. I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you (Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking about your knowledge of marine engines. Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong. You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of changing your handle a couple of times. Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or Reggie. I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite. You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya! Now that smarts. If you buttholes keep fanning the flames, It will never end. |
What are you doing, Harry?
|
Pot & Kettle in One Guy!
wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "secretagent" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 5:04 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:28 pm, wrote: On Mar 4, 4:25 pm, "JimH" wrote: "secretagent" wrote in message .. . "John H." wrote in message .. . On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:38:18 -0500, HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:04:45 -0500, HK wrote: N.L. Eckert wrote: Lots of people who were eligible in the Viet Nam era had high draft lottery numbers and simply weren't called up. DUH! If that were the case, wouldn't he have said so? Harry asserts that his name was "removed from the list". Not that I am a fan of harry's, but I don't see why Harry owes you or anybody else an explanation. ================================== He once told me that he had a college deferment and that kept him off the list for that time. That was the case with a lot of people at the time, including my district manager. And, you know what? I don't blame them one damn bit!! I would have avoided that war as quickly as anyone. Our Idiot-in-Chief took us into one of the worst wars imaginable and the expected the youth of the country to go fight it. And for what?? There was no winner, only a lot of losers..... Yep...I was II-S for a while. But then I graduated, and my draft status changed to I-A. But then...fate intervened. I certainly never "dodged" the draft. Harry, did you not earlier say that only the stupid got drafted? Dear Dumb John: You got drafted, right? Your question, therefore, is asked and answered. It must suck to be so embarrassed that you have to snip three-fourths of a post before replying. -- ***** Hope your day is better than decent! ***** John H He was deferred,reclassified 1A,dropped off the list, and blessed by a twist of fate. Seems like he went to a lot of trouble to stay home with the girls. And now he finally declares that he is not a draft dodger. I guess we should believe him. Eh. Harry wouldn't lie, would he? I am not defending Harry but I have to ask this question to you, Booger, Herring and Reggie.... Why the hell are you guys so obsessed about him and his past/present life? I can understand 3rd graders engaged in that behavior, but not grown men. You are all making an ass of yourself. Grow up.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I can't speak for them, but I can for me. I have been laid up for a while, and bored too. Sparing with Harry is fun, I think he likes it too, what's the harm? a bunch of crazy old men waiting for the snow to melt...;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'd get along fine with Harry if it weren't for his incessant lies.....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But he is just another sock puppet, here to play... Let me retell a story of an interview I saw just after the Imus, ho, comments. I think it might have been Dave Chappelle (sp?), a black actor was being interviewed. The comment to me was actually life altering... He said simply: "It's not what someone calls you, it's what you answer to...". Think about it... ========= Scott, you have a perverse view on the reason this NG exists. To you it is a playground where arguing and personally attacking members here is acceptable. That sort of thinking is what led this NG into the gutter. Gotta go.............time to see if I can entice my wife to turn off American Idol............. ;-) It started before you got on board Jim. Harry was doing the exact same dog and pony show when I first looked at the group years ago. His straight men have changed over the years but he hasn't. The nastiness you see from some of us is drawn out by old Harry boy himself. You want to change the tone of the group, change Harry or get rid of him. I tried to put some heat under his tail but apparently it didn't work. I was counting on him having a modicum of self respect but I couldn't find any in him. There is no way to get to this man. He's like an empty head with a wind up mouth. I give up. I remember a post from Dick (Eiscboch) a while back regarding you (Florida Jim) stating "when Jim speaks, folks listen". He was talking about your knowledge of marine engines. Until recently I saw nothing to prove that statement wrong. You then morphed into a Harry attack dog, even going to the extreme of changing your handle a couple of times. Go back to your roots Jim. Otherwise you look like a Booger, Herring or Reggie. I recall you getting mad at a certain someone because he has more stuff than you. I see you attacking Harry one day and sticking your nose up his butt the next. I see you as rather two faced. Now do you really think I value your thoughts? Nitey nite. Don't let the bed bugs bite. You are an immature asshole Jim. See ya! Now that smarts. If you buttholes keep fanning the flames, It will never end. |
Reggie shovels it.
|
Reggie keeps stirring it up...
|
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
"HK" wrote in message ... N.L. Eckert wrote: He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please. |
'Jim in Florida' just can't help himself.
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... N.L. Eckert wrote: He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please. You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole. Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that your fantasy? |
Harry Krause the Draft Dodger?
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... N.L. Eckert wrote: He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please. You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole. Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that your fantasy? Hey. Don't look at me. Someone else said it. I just changed the wording to suit you. Quit changing the subject line. You're confusing everyone. |
Florida Jim's Obsession
wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... N.L. Eckert wrote: He can try and spin it any way he wants. When his country called he turned and ran. ================================= The "country" didn't call. The Idiot-in-Chief (L BJ) called Have it your way , Harry. When our president, LBJ,called, you turned and ran. Is that better. You are so hard to please. You really, truly are an obsessed a**hole. Where, by the way, did you get the idea I "turned and ran"? Is that your fantasy? Hey. Don't look at me. Someone else said it. I just changed the wording to suit you. Quit changing the subject line. You're confusing everyone. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is
Here wrote: wrote: Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;) Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out. ;) Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing. |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Mar 5, 12:22*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;) Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. *Before you came here, Harry was the nicest guy you have ever meet. *His personality disorder is all your fault. *Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out. ;) Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You could just ask Harry himself.......... But he'd just lie about as usual.... |
What are you doing, Harry?
On Mar 5, 1:41*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote: John H. wrote: On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, *my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;) Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. *Before you came here, Harry was the nicest guy you have ever meet. *His personality disorder is all your fault. *Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out. ;) Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing. yes, until "Just" came here, we never had any problems with the group, it was like one big happy family. *"Cumbayaa my friends" "Just" should be ashamed of himself. ;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bailiff, whack his pee pee.. |
Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:24:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: wrote: Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought Probably my fault, I did the "ChinaSpam" to one of Harrys political posts last week. Didn't want to, but I couldn't help myself;) Yup, I have to agree, it is all your fault. Before you came here, Harry was the nicest guy you have ever meet. His personality disorder is all your fault. Now go stand in the corner until I tell you you can come out. ;) Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. So, he's perfectly suited to do his thing. |
Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:57:34 -0500, HK wrote:
Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. |
What are you doing, Harry?
HK wrote: Tim wrote: HK wrote: Tim wrote: Hary, how many times can you change the title fo this thread? Lets see it starterd out: harry Krause the Draft Dodger, then you changed it to 1) "Sexually perverted insults?", then 2) "Gay Racing Car Drivers", 3) "More on Gay Racing Car Drivers" 4) "And still more on gay racing car drivers" 5) "Reggie's pot stirring- nothing new" 6) "More of Reggie's pot sirring" 7) "Reggie stirs up the carp with frekin" 8) "Jim in Florida' takes the whole bottle of Viagra" 9) "More trash from :Jim in Florida" 10) Even more trash from Jim in Florida" 11) Jim H vs. Jim in Florida 12) More nastiness from 'Reggie' 13) Reggie: No boating plent'o' nastiness 14) Herring discusses his sexual prefferences 15) Herring plays kissy-face 16) Herring claims he can't stand himself. 17) Herring: nothng about boats. Why, Harry? I change headers on chinaSpam because we on Google, don't have filters, and see all the hideous titles to SPAM, but to torture a thread like this? Actully, my opinion (fwiw) is this isn't becoming of a person of which you would claim to be. I can imagine this coming from a nameless, faceless troller, but not of a person of any type of educational or professional standard. Why stoop to the behaviour that some would expect you to? Just a thought I'm simply altering the headlines to reflect the contents of the postings. If, for example, Herring or Loogy use an existing thread to go into "attack mode," then the subject no longer is relevant. I'm adding relevancy to the posts of the dirtbags, that's all! I understand that Harry,. but it makes you look like someone with no intellect, with kindergarten behaviour. I'm not a *smart* person, but I can't do that... Tell you what...*you* jump on the trashmeisters here every time they dump, and I'll just sit back and watch. Well, that would be fine, but I don't jump on trash piles. Not saying I haven't in the past, but I try to avoid confrontation, because it turns into nothing but harrassment with no construction. |
Herring keeps on keeping on keeping on and keeping on (he can'tcontrol himself)
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:57:34 -0500, HK wrote: Well, you have to admit that Harry never makes an attack post, or any post about people, their jobs, their possessions, their home, or anything else that could be considered derogatory. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com