Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:43:56 -0500, Eisboch penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Nuclear power is the answer. Clean, safe and has been the center of our solar system and of the universe for that matter, for billions of years. That sounds more like an endorsement for solar power. Leave the reactor on the sun where it belongs! Wind and solar power are nice to dream about but unless you want to radically change the way we live, (meaning going back to the early 1900's) they simply are not practical yet, nor will they be for quite a while when you compare them to nuclear generated power. The largest wind generator (as of 2005) is an off-shore monster that generates 5 mega watts of power. http://www.reuk.co.uk/Worlds-Largest...-Generator.htm The US currently has 104 operating nuclear plants that combined produce almost 100,000 mega watts. It would take about 20,000 of the wind monsters to equal that. Where are they going to be situated? Solar, although getting better, is still less efficient than wind. Eisboch |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Our next president | General | |||
I am the President! | ASA | |||
( OT) Help your president | General | |||
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General |