![]() |
Your President At Work
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Try putting some value to the greenback would be more like it. Jump interest rates to 15% to attract investment. Make the banks/owners honor the sub-prime or fold. Big government prints money and bail outs are just screwing the value of the USD on the world markets. Say for example the USD currency was not so diluted by debt bail outs and so forth, and 1/2 the dollars out there were not printed. The remaining dollars would be twice as much and the cost of gasoline would go down to 1/2 of what it is. Or about $50 USD per barrel. This problem of oil is a born in the USA issue, pure and simple. And if not fixed, count on a big flush. |
Your President At Work
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:48:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:25:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I don't know about that. There's nothing on the horizon to influence it that way. I'd like to hear your reasoning. It's pretty simple - it's a huge commodity bubble. There is absoutely nothing, and I mean nothing, to support these levels in any sense of the word. It's too much money chasing too little profit - a sort of currency inflation if you will. If I'm right, and I'm pretty sure I am, economic data will provide the catalyst for the crash - sometime around the middle to the end of July. Hmmmmm..... It sounds like you are basically in agreement with Doug. Did hell just freeze over? Well, obviously - six inches of snow last night and no open water anywhere. :) I'd add this - out of control information flow is also a function of this - anything will move the market. If somebody sneezes in Nigeria, another $.50 to $1. Fog in the Houston shipping channel - another $.50 to a $1. And it happens more and more often - issues that wouldn't have affected the price 10 years ago, now can cause 1-2% changes in price instantly. There is also the self-fullfilling prophecy aspect of this - goals are set by people who have a vested interest making sure it happens and the market does it's best to meet it. That is classically a bubble - no other way around it. And as fast as it went up, it will be faster coming down. |
Your President At Work
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Tax would just be passed onto the consumer, the US average Joe filling up to go to work. Companies could not pass that tax on abroad for very long, making the US company less competitive. Gasoline has not increase in those countries you mentioned like it has in the US. The real answer is to get the Fed currency management on a tight leash. |
Your President At Work
"HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? So if you (and millions of others) buy less, they need to buy less and the prices fall. |
Your President At Work
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? Is that why we never see much of Cheney? Is he too busy attending OPEC committee meetings, encouraging them to increase the price of oil? Eisboch Big government does like higher oil prices, bigger tax revenue when indexed on the price as a percentage. |
Your President At Work
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? I'm sure they do. But, there are also speculators at work, in the exact same way speculators dick with the price of stocks to the point where their prices are completely disconnected from physical & financial reality. Speculative nonsense: Think back. Although laughable when compared to current values, the price of oil quadrupled during the oil "shortage" crisis in the early 70's on Nixon's watch. Later that decade, under Carter it doubled again in less than 12 months. Neither had anything to do with Wall Street, Dick Cheney or secret "Big Oil" meetings with OPEC. Eisboch That was then. This is now. And (separate issue), in this discussion, I'm not concerned with any particular politician. In the long list of things you buy regularly, can you think of 5 or 6 whose prices are determined by speculators, causing almost daily price swings? I'm in the grocery biz, and I handle about 500 different products. I don't see this happening. How about shoes, or anything else you buy? I am on a conservation kick. I go barefoot. Seriously, at 100 bucks or so a barrel, I don't see daily price swings of a few dollars per barrel as being very significant. There's something more than speculators causing prices to more than double in two years. I admit, I don't fully understand how oil prices are "set" despite JimH's links. Seems to me that those who control the goods determine the price. Eisboch It's all the factors working together. Demand is part of it, but not all of it. The problem is that people will gamble on absolutely anything. If we added chick pea futures to the other available via the commodities exchanges, people would be gambling on chick peas. And if they are wrong, they lose their shirts. Supply and demand eventually wins. |
Your President At Work
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Canuck57" wrote in message news:4Jmyj.31064$w94.3216@pd7urf2no... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:32:58 -0800 (PST), wrote: Everyone says 4 dollars... I will throw my prediction in, I think we will test 5 dollars a gallon before the end of the year. I'll take that bet. I'll say that gas will be back at $2.34/gal by the end of the year. And oil will be down around $60/bl. What do you base that on? Fantasy what? If I knew you, I would gave you 3:1 odds against and an $10,000 wager you are wrong. I would up the odds to 4::1 on $100,000. There is no way oil will drop to $60/barrel and gasoline drop to $2.34 by the end of 2008, Presidential election year or not. This series of posts is a keeper. ;-) Hey, I was trying to make money on an almost assured bet, you undercut me.... Will do 5:1? |
Your President At Work
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Supplies will rise due to decreased demand. Take this past week for example - crude stocks are at six year highs and gas is at a four year high - distilates are at normal levels - and every one of them experienced a increase in price. It's just not logical, sustainable or in any way makeing economic sense. And when it doesn't make economic sense, it's a bubble. Not really a bubble at all. Say 1 barrel was worth one Kazoo dollar. The USD was worth $75 Kazoo dollars. The next day you woke up, the USD devalues by 33%, now takes $100 USD to by $1 Kazoo. Still, $1 Kazoo per barrel. That is what is happening for the most part. It isn't oil that is nuts, it is the value, or lack of value in the currency. Hard to hear, but is what is happening. Look to monetary policy by the US Fed and congress. If I was a US citizen, I wouldn't vote for my congress person. |
Your President At Work
wrote in message ... On Mar 1, 8:13 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:50:23 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Mar 1, 7:41 pm, "Canuck57" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:38sjs3h82ded28g7gqgm79uq7djnd2ag6e@4ax .com... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:32:58 -0800 (PST), wrote: Everyone says 4 dollars... I will throw my prediction in, I think we will test 5 dollars a gallon before the end of the year. I'll take that bet. I'll say that gas will be back at $2.34/gal by the end of the year. And oil will be down around $60/bl. What do you base that on? Fantasy what? If I knew you, I would gave you 3:1 odds against and an $10,000 wager you are wrong. Holy crap, I was just going to bet him and the loser has to answer the drunken dougies questions for a week;) For you and you only. If oil doesn't drop to around - say plus 5/minus4 - $60 by the end of the year, *I will give you that boat I told you about a month or so ago*. There - right out in public. :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Holy crap, bookmarked.....;) What the 'ell! Hope he wasn't talking about some 8' dinghy. |
Your President At Work
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? Is that why we never see much of Cheney? Is he too busy attending OPEC committee meetings, encouraging them to increase the price of oil? Eisboch Speaking of that...do you still have a vice president down there? We never hear of him up this way. |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. |
Your President At Work
On Mar 1, 9:46*pm, "Canuck57" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. *Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? Is that why we never see much of Cheney? *Is he too busy attending OPEC committee meetings, encouraging them to increase the price of oil? Eisboch Big government does like higher oil prices, bigger tax revenue when indexed on the price as a percentage.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No kidding! Here a few years ago when pump gas jumped from about 1.35 to 2.35, Gov. George Ryan put a stay on sales tax (6.25%) per gallon, andheld it for about 6 mo. Does'n't sound like much, but when you consider the big pic. it was a pretty good discount. Now comes our present governor. Price jmps over the $3.00 mark and people were saying "Hey guv. How about doing something with this gas sales tax?" The answer? "Nah, we're leaving it on this time because we're broke!" Errrr. OK so now the state is pulling in 6.75% per gal. on pump gas, and the state has more money flowing in from motor fuels tax revenues then they'd ever seen before. HUGE amounts! Like double what it was 10 years ago. The gov. still says we're broke. yeah.... r-r-r-r-ight! |
Your President At Work
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:09:02 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Oversight and pressure, and the excess profits tax could be used to help non-profit entities unaffiliated with big oil develop alternative energy sources. Wistful thinking. Despite your protests, industry drives innovation and technical development, not "non-profit" centers staffed with lifelong members of academia making a living on government grants. I've been exposed to both for many, many years. Industry is what makes things happen and imposing more taxes on it simply slows things down. Eisboch I see no reason to trust Big Oil, and I wasn't suggesting academia. Harry, your original comment was pure, liberal, anti-Bush, stupid. But, it did get Eisboch talking to you again, to tell you so. Therefore, it must have been worthwhile. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Your President At Work
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:02:18 -0500, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? More of your stupid, liberal, anti-Bush ****. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. Excess profits in what terms? Straight dollars, or percentage? It really wouldn't matter. Unlike the vast majority of businesses, crude oil is priced by a gambling parlor. Even if you (and I mean YOU specifically) could somehow control the profits of the oil companies, they still have to buy crude at prices determined by sheer lunacy. "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? Is that why we never see much of Cheney? Is he too busy attending OPEC committee meetings, encouraging them to increase the price of oil? Eisboch Speaking of that...do you still have a vice president down there? We never hear of him up this way. He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :) |
Your President At Work
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? |
Your President At Work
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:09:02 -0500, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Oversight and pressure, and the excess profits tax could be used to help non-profit entities unaffiliated with big oil develop alternative energy sources. Wistful thinking. Despite your protests, industry drives innovation and technical development, not "non-profit" centers staffed with lifelong members of academia making a living on government grants. I've been exposed to both for many, many years. Industry is what makes things happen and imposing more taxes on it simply slows things down. Eisboch I see no reason to trust Big Oil, and I wasn't suggesting academia. Harry, your original comment was pure, liberal, anti-Bush, stupid. But, it did get Eisboch talking to you again, to tell you so. Therefore, it must have been worthwhile. You don't really think I give a damn about what your three crosswired synapses produce, do you? |
Your President At Work
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:17:15 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:43:56 -0500, Eisboch penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Nuclear power is the answer. Clean, safe and has been the center of our solar system and of the universe for that matter, for billions of years. That sounds more like an endorsement for solar power. Leave the reactor on the sun where it belongs! Luddite. And I mean that in a most positive way. |
Your President At Work
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:43:56 -0500, Eisboch penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Nuclear power is the answer. Clean, safe and has been the center of our solar system and of the universe for that matter, for billions of years. That sounds more like an endorsement for solar power. Leave the reactor on the sun where it belongs! Wind and solar power are nice to dream about but unless you want to radically change the way we live, (meaning going back to the early 1900's) they simply are not practical yet, nor will they be for quite a while when you compare them to nuclear generated power. The largest wind generator (as of 2005) is an off-shore monster that generates 5 mega watts of power. http://www.reuk.co.uk/Worlds-Largest...-Generator.htm The US currently has 104 operating nuclear plants that combined produce almost 100,000 mega watts. It would take about 20,000 of the wind monsters to equal that. Where are they going to be situated? Solar, although getting better, is still less efficient than wind. Eisboch |
Your President At Work
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:19:55 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: I didn't look at the links, but that is solvable with citing and engineering refinements. When they installed a test farm here in the mountains of NC, the low frequency created by the airfoils drove people nuts.... even miles away and in the privacy of their home. I think we have enough data, now, to design around such considerations. You can cite them all you want, but I think a better option might be siting - heh, heh,heh... There are options other than nukes - I agree. And I think that solar is one good option. I also think that wind is another option. Geothermal is an option as is gravity generation (wave generators). Having said that, you will still need capacity for back up and clean coal plants cost as much, from an engineering/siting standpoint, as a nuke which has more capacity and is more efficient. |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to do so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled. |
Your President At Work
HK wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:09:02 -0500, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Oversight and pressure, and the excess profits tax could be used to help non-profit entities unaffiliated with big oil develop alternative energy sources. Wistful thinking. Despite your protests, industry drives innovation and technical development, not "non-profit" centers staffed with lifelong members of academia making a living on government grants. I've been exposed to both for many, many years. Industry is what makes things happen and imposing more taxes on it simply slows things down. Eisboch I see no reason to trust Big Oil, and I wasn't suggesting academia. Harry, your original comment was pure, liberal, anti-Bush, stupid. But, it did get Eisboch talking to you again, to tell you so. Therefore, it must have been worthwhile. You don't really think I give a damn about what your three crosswired synapses produce, do you? If you didn't care you wouldn't respond. |
Your President At Work
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:50:39 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote: "JimH" wrote in message .. . "Canuck57" wrote in message news:4Jmyj.31064$w94.3216@pd7urf2no... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:32:58 -0800 (PST), wrote: Everyone says 4 dollars... I will throw my prediction in, I think we will test 5 dollars a gallon before the end of the year. I'll take that bet. I'll say that gas will be back at $2.34/gal by the end of the year. And oil will be down around $60/bl. What do you base that on? Fantasy what? If I knew you, I would gave you 3:1 odds against and an $10,000 wager you are wrong. I would up the odds to 4::1 on $100,000. There is no way oil will drop to $60/barrel and gasoline drop to $2.34 by the end of 2008, Presidential election year or not. This series of posts is a keeper. ;-) Hey, I was trying to make money on an almost assured bet, you undercut me.... Will do 5:1? We'll see who is right. :) |
Your President At Work
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to do so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled. Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'? |
Your President At Work
"HK" wrote in message ... He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :) I wouldn't hold my breath...those %^%& politicians are slippery *******s. We would love to nail a former prime minister ( Ronnie Reagan bum boy) up here, but with his Conservative party currently in power....... he shucks & jives with the best of them. |
Your President At Work
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:09:02 -0500, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Oversight and pressure, and the excess profits tax could be used to help non-profit entities unaffiliated with big oil develop alternative energy sources. Wistful thinking. Despite your protests, industry drives innovation and technical development, not "non-profit" centers staffed with lifelong members of academia making a living on government grants. I've been exposed to both for many, many years. Industry is what makes things happen and imposing more taxes on it simply slows things down. Eisboch I see no reason to trust Big Oil, and I wasn't suggesting academia. Harry, your original comment was pure, liberal, anti-Bush, stupid. But, it did get Eisboch talking to you again, to tell you so. Therefore, it must have been worthwhile. You don't really think I give a damn about what your three crosswired synapses produce, do you? If you didn't care you wouldn't respond. You ought to consider putting a halt to your projecting, Blurt. To me, the non-thinking, doctrinaire *far* righties like Herring, you, and a couple of others here are just subjects for ridicule, certainly not anyone to take seriously. Why would I care what you think? What you think doesn't matter. |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to do so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled. Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'? It is Mr. Blurt to you Don. I am a Christian. I am a former Marine. I am proud of my life, what I have done so far and what I plan to do in the future. Loving your children does not require that you coddle them. |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :) I wouldn't hold my breath...those %^%& politicians are slippery *******s. We would love to nail a former prime minister ( Ronnie Reagan bum boy) up here, but with his Conservative party currently in power....... he shucks & jives with the best of them. Have you stopped and taken a look at why the Conservative party is in power? You can bitch about all you want but, a majority of your fellow citizens disagree with you. |
Your President At Work
"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:Mspyj.32409$w94.4370@pd7urf2no... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? I'm sure they do. But, there are also speculators at work, in the exact same way speculators dick with the price of stocks to the point where their prices are completely disconnected from physical & financial reality. Speculative nonsense: Think back. Although laughable when compared to current values, the price of oil quadrupled during the oil "shortage" crisis in the early 70's on Nixon's watch. Later that decade, under Carter it doubled again in less than 12 months. Neither had anything to do with Wall Street, Dick Cheney or secret "Big Oil" meetings with OPEC. Eisboch That was then. This is now. And (separate issue), in this discussion, I'm not concerned with any particular politician. In the long list of things you buy regularly, can you think of 5 or 6 whose prices are determined by speculators, causing almost daily price swings? I'm in the grocery biz, and I handle about 500 different products. I don't see this happening. How about shoes, or anything else you buy? I am on a conservation kick. I go barefoot. Seriously, at 100 bucks or so a barrel, I don't see daily price swings of a few dollars per barrel as being very significant. There's something more than speculators causing prices to more than double in two years. I admit, I don't fully understand how oil prices are "set" despite JimH's links. Seems to me that those who control the goods determine the price. Eisboch It's all the factors working together. Demand is part of it, but not all of it. The problem is that people will gamble on absolutely anything. If we added chick pea futures to the other available via the commodities exchanges, people would be gambling on chick peas. And if they are wrong, they lose their shirts. Supply and demand eventually wins. But someone always wins, no matter what happens to the speculators. That's a multi-million dollar business, and it does not serve the best interests of this country. |
Your President At Work
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message news:Mspyj.32409$w94.4370@pd7urf2no... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? I'm sure they do. But, there are also speculators at work, in the exact same way speculators dick with the price of stocks to the point where their prices are completely disconnected from physical & financial reality. Speculative nonsense: Think back. Although laughable when compared to current values, the price of oil quadrupled during the oil "shortage" crisis in the early 70's on Nixon's watch. Later that decade, under Carter it doubled again in less than 12 months. Neither had anything to do with Wall Street, Dick Cheney or secret "Big Oil" meetings with OPEC. Eisboch That was then. This is now. And (separate issue), in this discussion, I'm not concerned with any particular politician. In the long list of things you buy regularly, can you think of 5 or 6 whose prices are determined by speculators, causing almost daily price swings? I'm in the grocery biz, and I handle about 500 different products. I don't see this happening. How about shoes, or anything else you buy? I am on a conservation kick. I go barefoot. Seriously, at 100 bucks or so a barrel, I don't see daily price swings of a few dollars per barrel as being very significant. There's something more than speculators causing prices to more than double in two years. I admit, I don't fully understand how oil prices are "set" despite JimH's links. Seems to me that those who control the goods determine the price. Eisboch It's all the factors working together. Demand is part of it, but not all of it. The problem is that people will gamble on absolutely anything. If we added chick pea futures to the other available via the commodities exchanges, people would be gambling on chick peas. And if they are wrong, they lose their shirts. Supply and demand eventually wins. But someone always wins, no matter what happens to the speculators. That's a multi-million dollar business, and it does not serve the best interests of this country. Why doesn't it serve the best interests of this country? |
Your President At Work
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:48:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:25:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I don't know about that. There's nothing on the horizon to influence it that way. I'd like to hear your reasoning. It's pretty simple - it's a huge commodity bubble. There is absoutely nothing, and I mean nothing, to support these levels in any sense of the word. It's too much money chasing too little profit - a sort of currency inflation if you will. If I'm right, and I'm pretty sure I am, economic data will provide the catalyst for the crash - sometime around the middle to the end of July. Hmmmmm..... It sounds like you are basically in agreement with Doug. Did hell just freeze over? Well, obviously - six inches of snow last night and no open water anywhere. :) I'd add this - out of control information flow is also a function of this - anything will move the market. If somebody sneezes in Nigeria, another $.50 to $1. Fog in the Houston shipping channel - another $.50 to a $1. And it happens more and more often - issues that wouldn't have affected the price 10 years ago, now can cause 1-2% changes in price instantly. Bingo. And, it works in the exact same way as when irrelevant financial news causes nervous old ladies to sell their Toyota stock because Kroger reported a bad quarter. |
Your President At Work
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... What other monies will be spent to clean up after the coal? What is there to clean up? Modern scrubbers take nearly all of the particulate matter out of the exhaust. This assumes that some utilities don't purchase the privilege to not install the latest equipment. As things stand right now, they are able to purchase that privilege, and some have done so. |
Your President At Work
"BAR" wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message news:Mspyj.32409$w94.4370@pd7urf2no... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... "Big Oil" helps set the price of the crude it buys. You think it doesn't have "partners" sitting on the OPEC committees? I'm sure they do. But, there are also speculators at work, in the exact same way speculators dick with the price of stocks to the point where their prices are completely disconnected from physical & financial reality. Speculative nonsense: Think back. Although laughable when compared to current values, the price of oil quadrupled during the oil "shortage" crisis in the early 70's on Nixon's watch. Later that decade, under Carter it doubled again in less than 12 months. Neither had anything to do with Wall Street, Dick Cheney or secret "Big Oil" meetings with OPEC. Eisboch That was then. This is now. And (separate issue), in this discussion, I'm not concerned with any particular politician. In the long list of things you buy regularly, can you think of 5 or 6 whose prices are determined by speculators, causing almost daily price swings? I'm in the grocery biz, and I handle about 500 different products. I don't see this happening. How about shoes, or anything else you buy? I am on a conservation kick. I go barefoot. Seriously, at 100 bucks or so a barrel, I don't see daily price swings of a few dollars per barrel as being very significant. There's something more than speculators causing prices to more than double in two years. I admit, I don't fully understand how oil prices are "set" despite JimH's links. Seems to me that those who control the goods determine the price. Eisboch It's all the factors working together. Demand is part of it, but not all of it. The problem is that people will gamble on absolutely anything. If we added chick pea futures to the other available via the commodities exchanges, people would be gambling on chick peas. And if they are wrong, they lose their shirts. Supply and demand eventually wins. But someone always wins, no matter what happens to the speculators. That's a multi-million dollar business, and it does not serve the best interests of this country. Why doesn't it serve the best interests of this country? I'll need to use an analogy to answer that question. You OK with that? |
Your President At Work
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:35:57 -0400, "Don White"
wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to do so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled. Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'? Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's ass. Be your own man, Don. Harry doesn't need your hand-licking, tail-wagging, puppy dogging. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Your President At Work
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:45:29 -0500, HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:09:02 -0500, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I'll bet that Dicque Cheney is working right now with his "BIG OIL" buddies to try to knock the price of gas down temporarily two weeks before the November elections. Sure he is Harry. Sure he is. The blame for the price of oil doesn't reside with politicians, current or past. The blame resides with us. Eisboch I think a steep "excess profits tax" would tighten things up a hair, that and members representing the public and responsible to it sitting on big oil boards. How will that affect the price of a barrel of oil here? Or in Japan? or in China? or in Sweden? or in Great Britain? or in Germany? or Italy? Eisboch Oversight and pressure, and the excess profits tax could be used to help non-profit entities unaffiliated with big oil develop alternative energy sources. Wistful thinking. Despite your protests, industry drives innovation and technical development, not "non-profit" centers staffed with lifelong members of academia making a living on government grants. I've been exposed to both for many, many years. Industry is what makes things happen and imposing more taxes on it simply slows things down. Eisboch I see no reason to trust Big Oil, and I wasn't suggesting academia. Harry, your original comment was pure, liberal, anti-Bush, stupid. But, it did get Eisboch talking to you again, to tell you so. Therefore, it must have been worthwhile. You don't really think I give a damn about what your three crosswired synapses produce, do you? If you didn't care you wouldn't respond. You ought to consider putting a halt to your projecting, Blurt. To me, the non-thinking, doctrinaire *far* righties like Herring, you, and a couple of others here are just subjects for ridicule, certainly not anyone to take seriously. Why would I care what you think? What you think doesn't matter. Harry, you're the reigning expert on receiving ridicule. I'll bow to your expertise in that arena. How's the lobsta' boat? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Your President At Work
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:35:57 -0400, "Don White" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK wrote: BAR wrote: Eisboch wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Political blame for US election advantage. The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next President is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush? The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the IDIOT heads back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video games, booze, coke, and drunken driving. Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems will run. Got it? Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her? You're still past tense. -- John H Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny? Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would just about do it. Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again? Speaking of idiots........... I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating my food and drinking my beer. Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common. The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is acceptable to you? Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to do so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled. Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'? Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's ass. Be your own man, Don. Harry doesn't need your hand-licking, tail-wagging, puppy dogging. -- John H The connection between Harry and anyone else is largely imaginary. He just jumps in the "help" whether anyone needs it or not. But, you're the same way. When you live in a glass house, don't throw stones. |
Your President At Work
John H. wrote:
Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's ass. Tough soldier talk! snerk Herring, of course, is the newsgroup expert on soldier ass. |
Your President At Work
"HK" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's ass. Tough soldier talk! snerk Herring, of course, is the newsgroup expert on soldier ass. I'm betting he's seen his share! |
Your President At Work
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's ass. Tough soldier talk! snerk Herring, of course, is the newsgroup expert on soldier ass. I'm betting he's seen his share! Up close, too. Real close. Kissing distance. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com