OT We aren't protected
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.


You know it all, Doug.
--
John H


What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.

OT We aren't protected
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:28:29 -0500, HK wrote:

Calif Bill wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that
I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and
the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code;
Act
of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with
amendment
effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?




One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did
precisely as he was told.

You're so cool, Harry.
--
John H
That's rich John. A draft dodger using the word spineless on another person.

OT We aren't protected
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?


One can be sure that a spineless lump of defecation like Herring did
precisely as he was told.

sort of like you an Ullico?

OT We aren't protected
 

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.


You know it all, Doug.
--
John H


What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.


You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H

OT We aren't protected
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States
and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10,
US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the
best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who
said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea
of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American
is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.


You know it all, Doug.
--
John H


What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone
again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.


You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H


Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged.
When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If
I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.

OT We aren't protected
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States
and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10,
US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.

And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?


Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the
best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who
said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.

Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H

You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea
of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American
is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.

You know it all, Doug.
--
John H

What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone
again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.

You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H


Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged.
When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If
I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.




Hehehe. You go, guy!

OT We aren't protected
 

On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:45:20 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
.. .

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States
and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10,
US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.


And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?



Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the
best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who
said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.


Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H


You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea
of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American
is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.


You know it all, Doug.
--
John H


What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone
again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.


You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H


Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged.
When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If
I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.


RM second to the L to you.
--
John H

OT We aren't protected
 

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States
and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10,
US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.

And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?


Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the
best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who
said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.

Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H

You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea
of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American
is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.

You know it all, Doug.
--
John H

What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone
again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.

You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H


Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged.
When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If
I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.




Hehehe. You go, guy!

My gosh, two of you!

Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a
pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember.
--
John H

OT We aren't protected
 

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States
and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10,
US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.

And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?

Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But, earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so the
best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member who
said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens. I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.

Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H
You selected the text which you thought presented support for the idea
of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When American
is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.

You know it all, Doug.
--
John H
What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell anyone
again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.

You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons from
Harry?
--
John H

Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you pegged.
When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first load to go. If
I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.



Hehehe. You go, guy!

My gosh, two of you!

Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a
pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember.

Harry used to be the guy who said only those with tiny dicks owned
handguns. I am not sure why Harry likes to talk about male genitalia so
much, nor why he decided he need to shot beer cans and stumps.

I would think someone who considered himself an environmentalist, would
not want to spread lead all over the wilderness negatively impacting the
wildlife. But then again, we are talking about Harry.

Now he is high fiveing someone who is endorsing the concept of genocide
for those with different political philosophy.

OT We aren't protected
 

"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. ..
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:53:28 -0500, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:40:13 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:54:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:37:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support
and
defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign
and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same; and
that I will obey the orders of the President of the United
States and
the
orders of the officers appointed over me, according to
regulations
and
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title
10, US
Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in
1789,
with
amendment effective 5 October 1962).


......unless I'm John H.

And where does that say you have to obey an unlawful order?

Bill, you are absolutely correct. It doesn't say that. But,
earlier in
this
discussion, John presened what he obviously thought was
justification
for
cops & soldiers robbing citizens: Lots of guns were stolen, so
the best
thing to do is repeat the crime by stealing them from citizens.

I actually saw an interview with just one National Guard member
who said
there was something "odd" about doing this to American citizens.
I
suspect
he was ridiculed, disciplined or shot after that interview was
televised.

Doug, you're the one that posted the 'justification' which you
later
referred to as right wing trash or some such thing.

Is it that hard to keep your stories straight?
--
John H
You selected the text which you thought presented support for the
idea of
stealing guns from citizens. You approve of armed robbery committed
by
soldiers and cops. You are an enemy of the constitution. When
American is
run correctly, you will be managed out of existence. You're a
mindless
robot, John. Hopefully, your children aren't aware of this.

You know it all, Doug.
--
John H
What a robot you are, John. Do America a favor: Don't ever tell
anyone again
that you served in the military. You're the worst possible example of
a
soldier. You probably would've enjoyed being at My Lai.

You know it all, Doug. You're getting quite the mouth. Taking lessons
from
Harry?
--
John H

Harry's a lightweight. You know that. I, on the other hand, have you
pegged. When the cleanup happens, you will hopefully be in the first
load to go. If I lived closer, I'd be honored to help.


Hehehe. You go, guy!

My gosh, two of you!

Now let's see, just what am I supposed to point at the front door - a
pistol? 30-30? 12 Gauge? Oh my, I can't remember.

Harry used to be the guy who said only those with tiny dicks owned
handguns. I am not sure why Harry likes to talk about male genitalia so
much, nor why he decided he need to shot beer cans and stumps.

I would think someone who considered himself an environmentalist, would
not want to spread lead all over the wilderness negatively impacting the
wildlife. But then again, we are talking about Harry.

Now he is high fiveing someone who is endorsing the concept of genocide
for those with different political philosophy.


Political philosophy??? Since when is approving of armed robbery a
political philosophy? Try that line if you're ever being interviewed for
jury duty.