|
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New Orleans. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4 Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House of Representatives thought otherwise: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55 Articles about the crimes committed by the police: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/ http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836 NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police: http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177 "Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door. There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered. (The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)" Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about. -- John H What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****. My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh perfect one? -- John H |
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New Orleans. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4 Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House of Representatives thought otherwise: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55 Articles about the crimes committed by the police: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/ http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836 NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police: http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177 "Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door. There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered. (The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)" Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about. -- John H What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****. My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh perfect one? -- John H Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse. Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses. |
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New Orleans. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4 Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House of Representatives thought otherwise: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55 Articles about the crimes committed by the police: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/ http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836 NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police: http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177 "Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door. There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered. (The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)" Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about. -- John H What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****. My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh perfect one? -- John H Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse. Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses. Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it? Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well with your outfit. -- John H |
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New Orleans. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4 Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House of Representatives thought otherwise: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55 Articles about the crimes committed by the police: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/ http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836 NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police: http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177 "Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door. There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered. (The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)" Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about. -- John H What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****. My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh perfect one? -- John H Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse. Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses. Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it? Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well with your outfit. -- John H OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? |
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:22:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New Orleans. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4 Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House of Representatives thought otherwise: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55 Articles about the crimes committed by the police: http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/ http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836 NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police: http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177 "Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was issued after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while flying over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible for these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over when the police and National Guard knocked on the door. There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the wake of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered. (The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if they could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)" Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about. -- John H What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****. My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh perfect one? -- John H Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse. Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses. Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it? Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well with your outfit. -- John H OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and far beneath my dignity. -- John H |
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and far beneath my dignity. -- John H What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed robbery? |
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and far beneath my dignity. -- John H What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed robbery? RML -- John H |
OT We aren't protected
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and far beneath my dignity. -- John H What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed robbery? RML -- John H Pansy! |
OT We aren't protected
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:46:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question: Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get their hands on during the Katrina mess? I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and far beneath my dignity. -- John H What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed robbery? RML -- John H Pansy! Harry! -- John H |
OT We aren't protected
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962). .......unless I'm John H. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com