On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the
House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed
over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were
recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry
about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the
House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H


Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read
completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse.
Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses.

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the
House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed
over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were
recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry
about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the
House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H


Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read
completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the excuse.
Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses.


Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says
something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it?

Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well
with your outfit.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the
House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters
responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed
over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were
recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry
about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the
House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H


Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read
completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the
excuse.
Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses.


Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says
something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it?

Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well
with your outfit.
--
John H


OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:22:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:20:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Earlier, you pretended to wonder about the gun confiscations in New
Orleans.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

Even though you implied that the cops only took guns from thugs, the
House
of Representatives thought otherwise:
http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...d=202&issue=55

Articles about the crimes committed by the police:
http://www.gunsandammomag.com/second_amendment/0506r/
http://www.reason.com/news/show/32966.html
http://www.stateline.org/live/detail...ntentId=198836

NRA effort to put an end to the crimes committed by police:
http://www.nraila.org//Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=177



"Some police officers told reporters that the confiscation order was
issued
after Army, Coast Guard and police helicopters were fired upon while
flying
over the city. It is reasonable to assume that the shooters
responsible
for
these attacks used illegal firearms, which would not simply be handed
over
when the police and National Guard knocked on the door.

There certainly was no shortage of guns available to criminals. In the
wake
of the storm, more than 1,000 guns were stolen from gun dealers in
Alabama,
Louisiana and Mississippi. Only about 130 of these weapons were
recovered.

(The Associated Press also reported that some police officers asked if
they
could borrow guns from citizens. The officers explained that they were
outgunned during running street battles with armed criminals.)"

Sounds like neither the police nor the Guard had anything to worry
about.
--
John H


What bull**** left wing source did you get that from? Fortunately, the
House
of Representatives didn't fall for that bull****.


My quote came from one of your sources above. You didn't read them, oh
perfect one?
--
John H


Not all of them. I have about 30 articles. Obviously, the one you read
completely used that information to illustrate the absurdity of the
excuse.
Luckily, the House of Representatives didn't fall for those excuses.


Maybe you should just hush. Posting **** you've not read kinda says
something about your 'debating' capabilities, doesn't it?

Doug, go look up the 'Christmas Goose' colloquialism. It would look well
with your outfit.
--
John H


OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?


I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and
far beneath my dignity.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...

OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could
get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?


I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and
far beneath my dignity.
--
John H


What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed
robbery?

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .

OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could
get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?


I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and
far beneath my dignity.
--
John H


What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed
robbery?


RML
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..

OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could
get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?


I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and
far beneath my dignity.
--
John H


What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed
robbery?


RML
--
John H


Pansy!

On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:46:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:06:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

OK. Maybe you're right. But, I have one last question:

Do you think it was OK for the police to collect ALL the guns they could
get
their hands on during the Katrina mess?


I have an answer for that, but it would be something Harry might say and
far beneath my dignity.
--
John H


What a soldier you are. You can't answer a simple question about armed
robbery?


RML
--
John H


Pansy!


Harry!
--
John H

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic;
that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey
the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the
officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of
Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960
replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5
October 1962).


.......unless I'm John H.