JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php
It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but to
me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. I would love to
see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.
I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy subjects.
He can't be trusted.
Just like McCain voting against the tax cuts before he voted for the tax
cuts. What is it with these Vietnam era naval officers that makes them
wafflers.


Age and experience, maybe. Only a complete idiot has an unbending, almost
religious belief in the "never raise taxes" concept. Remember Bush-1? What
did you think of his shift on the subject?



You are welcome to send extra money into the US's General Fund anytime
you want.

How come the government never takes a revenue cut?

wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:03:45 -0500, "Jim"
wrote:

Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Richardson ... for his foreign policy experience

Selling to the Chinese.

"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message . ..
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php
It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but
to me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. I would
love to see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.
I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy
subjects. He can't be trusted.
Just like McCain voting against the tax cuts before he voted for the tax
cuts. What is it with these Vietnam era naval officers that makes them
wafflers.


Age and experience, maybe. Only a complete idiot has an unbending, almost
religious belief in the "never raise taxes" concept. Remember Bush-1?
What did you think of his shift on the subject?

You are welcome to send extra money into the US's General Fund anytime you
want.

How come the government never takes a revenue cut?



Because our elected slobs are too well-guarded, so they have no reason to do
what's right.

On Jan 25, 9:28*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...







"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php

It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but to
me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. *I would love to
see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.

I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy subjects. He
can't be trusted.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I like Mark's assessment "a bizarre robotic nutball Mormon presidental
candidate".

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:16:14 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 25, 9:28*am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...







"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php

It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but to
me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. *I would love to
see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.

I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy subjects. He
can't be trusted.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I like Mark's assessment "a bizarre robotic nutball Mormon presidental
candidate".

Loogy, earlier you asked me a question and I was polite enough to answer
it. Did you not say the following:

"My brother is a chemist for a large pharmecutical company. He couldn't
wait to get out of the military because there was no progressive type
learning."
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H

wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 9:28 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...







"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php

It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but to
me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. I would love to
see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.

I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy subjects.
He
can't be trusted.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I like Mark's assessment "a bizarre robotic nutball Mormon presidental
candidate".

============================

Robotic is right!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NlIMQ31EjY

"Kippered" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:16:14 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 25, 9:28 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...







"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in
message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
this guy.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/06062...ewal/index.php

It is hard to tell what kind of president any candidate will be, but
to
me his is the most impressive candidate on the slate. I would love to
see Obama and McCain on the Nov. Ballot.

I'd add Romney to the list. They all have qualities you can admire.
Romney has sound management experience.
McCain is a nice guy with a good heart.
Obama's cognative and communicative skills are superior to any other
candidate running.
Romney and McCain would make a good team. Hard to beat.
Obama would have a tough time selecting a running mate among the other
democratic candidates. His choice will be critical to his success.

Romney completely changes his theme too often on certain touchy
subjects. He
can't be trusted.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I like Mark's assessment "a bizarre robotic nutball Mormon presidental
candidate".

Loogy, earlier you asked me a question and I was polite enough to answer
it. Did you not say the following:

"My brother is a chemist for a large pharmecutical company. He couldn't
wait to get out of the military because there was no progressive type
learning."
--
***** Hope your day is better than decent! *****

John H


It's hard enough for him to keep up with his lies in one thread, please
don't tax him any further.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:57:10 -0500, "MMC" wrote:


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news:ZPmmj.2732

Just like McCain voting against the tax cuts before he voted for the
tax
cuts. What is it with these Vietnam era naval officers that makes them
wafflers.


Age and experience, maybe. Only a complete idiot has an unbending,
almost
religious belief in the "never raise taxes" concept. Remember Bush-1?
What
did you think of his shift on the subject?

Paul O'Neil spoke about that in the book authored by Ronald Suskind called
"The Price of Loyalty". Seems that Bush 1 had won the office on a promise
of
tax breaks and when it was explained to him what this would do to the
economy, he backed off, knowing the broken promise would cost him his
second
term.
To me, forfeiting a second term for the good of the country says a lot
about
this man.


Is your nickname, "spinmeister"? It should be!




Why is it "spin"?

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:39:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:57:10 -0500, "MMC" wrote:


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news:ZPmmj.2732

Just like McCain voting against the tax cuts before he voted for the
tax
cuts. What is it with these Vietnam era naval officers that makes
them
wafflers.


Age and experience, maybe. Only a complete idiot has an unbending,
almost
religious belief in the "never raise taxes" concept. Remember Bush-1?
What
did you think of his shift on the subject?

Paul O'Neil spoke about that in the book authored by Ronald Suskind
called
"The Price of Loyalty". Seems that Bush 1 had won the office on a
promise
of
tax breaks and when it was explained to him what this would do to the
economy, he backed off, knowing the broken promise would cost him his
second
term.
To me, forfeiting a second term for the good of the country says a lot
about
this man.


Is your nickname, "spinmeister"? It should be!




Why is it "spin"?


Why don't you understand simple concepts?




In this thread, you have only contributed one comment:

"Is your nickname, "spinmeister"? It should be!"

Make a clearer statement about the CONTENT of the message preceding yours,
and then maybe there will be a concept to understand. If you're as smart as
you want us to believe, you should be able to explain what you meant.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:07:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:39:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:57:10 -0500, "MMC" wrote:


"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
news:ZPmmj.2732

Just like McCain voting against the tax cuts before he voted for
the
tax
cuts. What is it with these Vietnam era naval officers that makes
them
wafflers.


Age and experience, maybe. Only a complete idiot has an unbending,
almost
religious belief in the "never raise taxes" concept. Remember
Bush-1?
What
did you think of his shift on the subject?

Paul O'Neil spoke about that in the book authored by Ronald Suskind
called
"The Price of Loyalty". Seems that Bush 1 had won the office on a
promise
of
tax breaks and when it was explained to him what this would do to the
economy, he backed off, knowing the broken promise would cost him his
second
term.
To me, forfeiting a second term for the good of the country says a lot
about
this man.


Is your nickname, "spinmeister"? It should be!




Why is it "spin"?


Why don't you understand simple concepts?




In this thread, you have only contributed one comment:

"Is your nickname, "spinmeister"? It should be!"

Make a clearer statement about the CONTENT of the message preceding yours,
and then maybe there will be a concept to understand. If you're as smart
as
you want us to believe, you should be able to explain what you meant.


You seem to be the only one struggling with it.




So....do you disagree with Paul O'Neill? Or, did you have any other reason
for saying "spinmeister"?