On Jan 26, 8:45*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
om...
It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.

In 1998?

Eisboch

Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."

Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such action at
the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize.

"You fellows keep missing the real points.

" One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on to
invade, *......"

Stop. * * *Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well before Bush
took office.
The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery.

Maybe Bill didn't trust the intel. I wouldn't trust a word from certain
federal intel or police agencies, e.g., the FBI.

--
Billary, the most sold out Whitehouse in history.
Harry (stinky) Krause


That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord...

wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:45 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.
In 1998?
Eisboch
Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."
Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such action at
the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize.
"You fellows keep missing the real points.
" One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on to
invade, ......"
Stop. Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well before Bush
took office.
The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery.
Maybe Bill didn't trust the intel. I wouldn't trust a word from certain
federal intel or police agencies, e.g., the FBI.










That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord...


No, it is because I believe the FBI is a corrupt agency.





--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

"HK" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:45 pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the
Bush
Admin.
In 1998?
Eisboch
Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to
decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."
Yet most of the influencial Democrats in Congress promoted such action
at
the time, a fact you seem to refuse to recognize.
"You fellows keep missing the real points.
" One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on
to
invade, ......"
Stop. Again, most leading Dems advocated such action well before
Bush
took office.
The fact that Clinton didn't is somewhat of a mystery.
Maybe Bill didn't trust the intel. I wouldn't trust a word from certain
federal intel or police agencies, e.g., the FBI.










That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord...


No, it is because I believe the FBI is a corrupt agency.





--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?

D.Duck wrote:
"HK" wrote in message


That's only cause you have the ear of the Supreme Overlord...

No, it is because I believe the FBI is a corrupt agency.





--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?




What does "liking" this country have to do with respecting corrupt
institutions or incompetent public officials? Am I suppose to respect
the U.S. Justice Department, for example, when, for the last few years
it was run by an incompetent political hack or is now run by a judge who
cannot decide whether torture is torture? Am I supposed to like Donald
Rumsfeld?

I like this country, so I expect it to do better.

HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?



What does "liking" this country have to do with respecting corrupt
institutions or incompetent public officials? Am I suppose to respect
the U.S. Justice Department, for example, when, for the last few years
it was run by an incompetent political hack or is now run by a judge who
cannot decide whether torture is torture? Am I supposed to like Donald
Rumsfeld?

I like this country, so I expect it to do better.

What about when Janet Reno ran the Justice department? There are many US
citizens who believe she ran the most corrupt Justice department.

Many people died because of her faulty decisions.

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?



What does "liking" this country have to do with respecting corrupt
institutions or incompetent public officials? Am I suppose to respect
the U.S. Justice Department, for example, when, for the last few years
it was run by an incompetent political hack or is now run by a judge
who cannot decide whether torture is torture? Am I supposed to like
Donald Rumsfeld?

I like this country, so I expect it to do better.

What about when Janet Reno ran the Justice department? There are many US
citizens who believe she ran the most corrupt Justice department.

Many people died because of her faulty decisions.




Without getting into the particulars, perhaps you should go to the book
store today, find a dictionary, and look up "corrupt" and "faulty," and
see if they mean the same thing.

--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Is there anything, just anything about this country that you like?



What does "liking" this country have to do with respecting corrupt
institutions or incompetent public officials? Am I suppose to respect
the U.S. Justice Department, for example, when, for the last few
years it was run by an incompetent political hack or is now run by a
judge who cannot decide whether torture is torture? Am I supposed to
like Donald Rumsfeld?

I like this country, so I expect it to do better.

What about when Janet Reno ran the Justice department? There are many
US citizens who believe she ran the most corrupt Justice department.

Many people died because of her faulty decisions.




Without getting into the particulars, perhaps you should go to the book
store today, find a dictionary, and look up "corrupt" and "faulty," and
see if they mean the same thing.


You've told me I too stupid to understand big words. Why don't you
explain it to me using little worlds which I might understand.