On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.

It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,

I've seen all that crap a zillion times.

Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.

I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk
wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have
mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.

It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,

I've seen all that crap a zillion times.

Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.

I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?


They all said what they believed at the time. The issue is the word TIME.
When did he have these things, and how close was he to actually having them
ready to use? "Moments from turning the last screw", as the CIA put it when
debating where Pakistan was in its nuke program.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk
wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have
mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.

It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,

I've seen all that crap a zillion times.

Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.

I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?


They all said what they believed at the time. The issue is the word TIME.
When did he have these things, and how close was he to actually having
them ready to use? "Moments from turning the last screw", as the CIA put
it when debating where Pakistan was in its nuke program.


The facts are pretty well established, both in text and video. For you're
memory summary:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk
wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have
mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.

It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass
destruction,

I've seen all that crap a zillion times.

Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.

I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?


They all said what they believed at the time. The issue is the word TIME.
When did he have these things, and how close was he to actually having
them ready to use? "Moments from turning the last screw", as the CIA put
it when debating where Pakistan was in its nuke program.


The facts are pretty well established, both in text and video. For you're
memory summary:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE

Eisboch


That video shows statements by politicians. I think I see the problem here.
I'm reading something you're not. Read this, and then let me know what you
think about statements made by politicians:

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...46199575&itm=1

I'll have it finished by Monday. By then, you should be able to find out if
your public library has the book. Without it, I honestly don't think you can
discuss the subject any further, especially if your idea of "facts" is
typified by that youtube video.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.
It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
I've seen all that crap a zillion times.
Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.
I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?


Most of those you wonder about were supplied intel by the Bush Admin.
But you know what? It doesn't matter what they did. Bush is the one who
lied to get his war started.


--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:28:51 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.
It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
I've seen all that crap a zillion times.
Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.
I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.

I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?

Most of those you wonder about were supplied intel by the Bush Admin.
But you know what? It doesn't matter what they did. Bush is the one who
lied to get his war started.

Unfortunate. It would appear that you can't give a honest answer to
an honest question.

Thought better of you actually.

Oh well...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:28:51 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:59:41 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:34:37 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:48:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:05:42 -0500, hk wrote:

Come on - you are smarter than that.
Yup. Bill Lied About Sex.
It not about WHAT he lied about - it's that he LIED about it.
Yeah, well, if it had been something important, it might have mattered.
As it was over sex, it didn't.
It's not the issue - the issue is that he lied. Period. End of
Dicsussion.

Now, lying us into a war - as Bush has done - that matters.
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction,
I've seen all that crap a zillion times.
Just answer the question - it's simple.

Did all those people lie about the WMDs?

If you can't give a yes or no answer based on your statement below,
then you are a partisan hack and not a very good one either.

Bush lied us into war. No way out of it.
I'll ask you again - did all those other people, including President
Clinton, lie about Iraq's WMDs?

Yes or no.
I'm still waiting - yoo hoo - anybody home?

Hello?
Most of those you wonder about were supplied intel by the Bush Admin.
But you know what? It doesn't matter what they did. Bush is the one who
lied to get his war started.

Unfortunate. It would appear that you can't give a honest answer to
an honest question.

Thought better of you actually.

Oh well...


It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.

--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

"HK" wrote in message
. ..


It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.



In 1998?

Eisboch

On Jan 26, 7:44*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

. ..



It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.

In 1998?

Eisboch

hurmph...

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..

It's an absolutely honest answer. The Dems got their intel from the Bush
Admin.



In 1998?

Eisboch



Whatever information Clinton had in 1998 wasn't enough for him to decide
to invade Iraq, depose Saddam, and set up an ersatz "democracy."

You fellows keep missing the real points.

One of them is that it was Bush, not Clinton, that had the hard on to
invade, even before he presumed office, and it was the Bush Admin that
cooked the books to "justify" an invasion, it was the Bush Admin that
decided to invade "light" of the necessary troops to handle the
aftermath, and it has been the Bush Admin that has screwed up just about
everything in and about Iraq since.

And what have we learned about Bush bringing "democracy" to the Arab
world? When you give them elections, they elect Hamas.

Bush is the worst president in this country's history, and he's going to
prove it every day until he is out of office.





--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!