"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...


You will (or should) recall that the biggest mouth during the inquisition
belonged to Gingrich, who later said he was having an affair at the time.
He didn't think HIS OWN behavior was wrong. Therefore, he didn't REALLY
believe Clinton's behavior was wrong. Based on these FACTS, we can only
conclude that he led the charge for political gain, not because of his
opinion of Clinton's behavior.


The difference is Gingrich (who, BTW, I have little respect for) didn't
deny his affair under oath.

It's the dishonesty issue, not the event.

Eisboch



Then, you're OK with Reagan telling congress that Pakistan was not
developing nuclear weapons, while in fact he helped them get the materials
they needed, by hobbling the efforts of two agencies which were trying to
stop the transfer of those materials.

My point is, I just want to be sure you're being consistent. Sleaze is
sleaze.