"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:56:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Are you sure? Seems like everybody but those who kiss his ass are in
there. That would be JimH, and hmm, I don't know who else wouldn't be
in there.....

Don't forget our resident Canuckastani terrorist.

I'd be careful with that kind of talk during snowbird season.
There just might be enough to take over & banish large fuel guzzling boats.

Don White wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:56:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Are you sure? Seems like everybody but those who kiss his ass are in
there. That would be JimH, and hmm, I don't know who else wouldn't be
in there.....
Don't forget our resident Canuckastani terrorist.

I'd be careful with that kind of talk during snowbird season.
There just might be enough to take over & banish large fuel guzzling boats.


I think a $10 a gallon diesel surtax on boats the size of Wayne's RV
would be appropriate.

HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:56:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Are you sure? Seems like everybody but those who kiss his ass are in
there. That would be JimH, and hmm, I don't know who else wouldn't be
in there.....
Don't forget our resident Canuckastani terrorist.

I'd be careful with that kind of talk during snowbird season.
There just might be enough to take over & banish large fuel guzzling
boats.

I think a $10 a gallon diesel surtax on boats the size of Wayne's RV
would be appropriate.

That is so typical of you, you want everyone else to pay for your social
programs. As long as someone else pays for them, the more the merrier.

I think a $20 a gallon surtax on all boats in the Cheseapeake Bay, that
use more than 6 gph woiuld be appropriate.

Harry, you do realize that Wayne's boat is substantially more "Green"
than you little jon boat.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:56:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Are you sure? Seems like everybody but those who kiss his ass are in
there. That would be JimH, and hmm, I don't know who else wouldn't be
in there.....
Don't forget our resident Canuckastani terrorist.

I'd be careful with that kind of talk during snowbird season.
There just might be enough to take over & banish large fuel guzzling
boats.
I think a $10 a gallon diesel surtax on boats the size of Wayne's RV would
be appropriate.

We have a program up here with vehicles....if you buy an inefficient gas
guzzler, you pay a special fee or tax... if you buy a fuel efficient vehicle
you get a rebate from one to two K.
I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.

Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:56:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Are you sure? Seems like everybody but those who kiss his ass are in
there. That would be JimH, and hmm, I don't know who else wouldn't be
in there.....
Don't forget our resident Canuckastani terrorist.
I'd be careful with that kind of talk during snowbird season.
There just might be enough to take over & banish large fuel guzzling
boats.
I think a $10 a gallon diesel surtax on boats the size of Wayne's RV would
be appropriate.

We have a program up here with vehicles....if you buy an inefficient gas
guzzler, you pay a special fee or tax... if you buy a fuel efficient vehicle
you get a rebate from one to two K.
I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.




I thought it was SW Tom who was the licensed charter captain. Wayne just
takes out the garbage when Mrs. Wayne unleashes him. :}

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.

Why not - I do. :)

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.

Why not - I do. :)

Now, I can see paying to watch you fish...just for the entertainment
value... :}

On Jan 18, 1:02*pm, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.

Why not - I do. *:)

Now, I can see paying to watch you fish...just for the entertainment
value... * :}

No, if it's entertainment you want, come watch me fish. It's like, I
know there is something down there in the water, but I still have not
really figured out what it is.. After all, once in a while when I do
catch one it's not in the water anymore, it's all very confusing..

wrote:
On Jan 18, 1:02 pm, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:
I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.
Why not - I do. :)
Now, I can see paying to watch you fish...just for the entertainment
value... :}

No, if it's entertainment you want, come watch me fish. It's like, I
know there is something down there in the water, but I still have not
really figured out what it is.. After all, once in a while when I do
catch one it's not in the water anymore, it's all very confusing..


Well, if you ever get your butt down here, let me know, and we'll go out
and find some flounder or other good eating fish. It's only the plonkers
who chase after stripers, or, as they usually spell it, "strippers."

On Jan 18, 12:04*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:
I don't know if WayneD still takes out paying fishing customers, but if so I
imagine he'd just pass any additional costs on to them.

Why not - I do. *:)

No you don't...