REPUBLICAN RIVALS SHARE ONE BOND: ALL LOSERS

By CHARLES HURT
NY Post

January 16, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - With this field of losers, it's no
wonder the race for the GOP presidential nomination remains completely
up for grabs.

The only common bond among the Republicans running is that each one has
managed to humiliate himself with disastrous defeats at some point or
another.

These guys have no running game, no passing game, no nothing.

Mike Huckabee got the ball in Iowa and promptly dropped it. John McCain
got it in New Hampshire and fumbled it last night in Michigan.

Now Mitt Romney has the ball and is destined to drop it in South
Carolina on Saturday.

But there's only one GOP candidate that beats all the rest at being a
loser: Rudy Giuliani.

He has perfected the art of underperforming to the point that his
campaign now insists it was all part of his game plan.

He's been reduced to watching from the sidelines and praying for other
people to lose - like McCain in Michigan so his momentum would be
stalled - rather than getting in the game and winning himself.

In fact, Rudy's campaigned so badly that the latest poll shows him
losing New Jersey, which had a front-row seat for his shining moment
during 9/11.

Even fringe candidate Ron Paul - the million-to-one long shot everybody
picks on to make themselves look good - is beating Giuliani.

Paul, who finished ahead of Giuliani in Michigan, currently has twice as
much claim on the Republican nomination as "America's Mayor."

He's picked up two delegates.

Giuliani? He's got just one.

On Jan 17, 9:02�am, HK wrote:
REPUBLICAN RIVALS SHARE ONE BOND: ALL LOSERS

By CHARLES HURT
NY Post

January 16, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - With this field of losers, it's no
wonder the race for the GOP presidential nomination remains completely
up for grabs.

The only common bond among the Republicans running is that each one has
managed to humiliate himself with disastrous defeats at some point or
another.

These guys have no running game, no passing game, no nothing.

Mike Huckabee got the ball in Iowa and promptly dropped it. John McCain
got it in New Hampshire and fumbled it last night in Michigan.

Now Mitt Romney has the ball and is destined to drop it in South
Carolina on Saturday.

But there's only one GOP candidate that beats all the rest at being a
loser: Rudy Giuliani.

He has perfected the art of underperforming to the point that his
campaign now insists it was all part of his game plan.

He's been reduced to watching from the sidelines and praying for other
people to lose - like McCain in Michigan so his momentum would be
stalled - rather than getting in the game and winning himself.

In fact, Rudy's campaigned so badly that the latest poll shows him
losing New Jersey, which had a front-row seat for his shining moment
during 9/11.

Even fringe candidate Ron Paul - the million-to-one long shot everybody
picks on to make themselves look good - is beating Giuliani.

Paul, who finished ahead of Giuliani in Michigan, currently has twice as
much claim on the Republican nomination as "America's Mayor."

He's picked up two delegates.

Giuliani? He's got just one.

Thank the gods we've got you to tell us how the primaries are going,
Harry. Where do you find these little-known and arcane tidbits,
anyway?

:-)

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 17, 9:02�am, HK wrote:
REPUBLICAN RIVALS SHARE ONE BOND: ALL LOSERS

By CHARLES HURT
NY Post

January 16, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - With this field of losers, it's no
wonder the race for the GOP presidential nomination remains completely
up for grabs.

The only common bond among the Republicans running is that each one has
managed to humiliate himself with disastrous defeats at some point or
another.

These guys have no running game, no passing game, no nothing.

Mike Huckabee got the ball in Iowa and promptly dropped it. John McCain
got it in New Hampshire and fumbled it last night in Michigan.

Now Mitt Romney has the ball and is destined to drop it in South
Carolina on Saturday.

But there's only one GOP candidate that beats all the rest at being a
loser: Rudy Giuliani.

He has perfected the art of underperforming to the point that his
campaign now insists it was all part of his game plan.

He's been reduced to watching from the sidelines and praying for other
people to lose - like McCain in Michigan so his momentum would be
stalled - rather than getting in the game and winning himself.

In fact, Rudy's campaigned so badly that the latest poll shows him
losing New Jersey, which had a front-row seat for his shining moment
during 9/11.

Even fringe candidate Ron Paul - the million-to-one long shot everybody
picks on to make themselves look good - is beating Giuliani.

Paul, who finished ahead of Giuliani in Michigan, currently has twice as
much claim on the Republican nomination as "America's Mayor."

He's picked up two delegates.

Giuliani? He's got just one.

Thank the gods we've got you to tell us how the primaries are going,
Harry. Where do you find these little-known and arcane tidbits,
anyway?

:-)


Why, from the "Republicans-are-dirty-turds" email circulation list, of
course.

:-)

I'm guessing the expensive empty suit - Romney - will be the nominee,
and the candidate from Jesusville - Huckleberry - will be his running
mate. A perfect ticket to move the nation backwards another 100 years.

"HK" wrote in message
...



I'm guessing the expensive empty suit - Romney - will be the nominee, and
the candidate from Jesusville - Huckleberry - will be his running mate. A
perfect ticket to move the nation backwards another 100 years.



Moving back 100 years might not be a bad idea.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...



I'm guessing the expensive empty suit - Romney - will be the nominee, and
the candidate from Jesusville - Huckleberry - will be his running mate. A
perfect ticket to move the nation backwards another 100 years.



Moving back 100 years might not be a bad idea.

Eisboch


So true.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...



I'm guessing the expensive empty suit - Romney - will be the nominee, and
the candidate from Jesusville - Huckleberry - will be his running mate. A
perfect ticket to move the nation backwards another 100 years.



Moving back 100 years might not be a bad idea.

Eisboch

Did I just hear Harry project Romney the winner of the presidential race?

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 17, 9:02�am, HK wrote:
REPUBLICAN RIVALS SHARE ONE BOND: ALL LOSERS

By CHARLES HURT
NY Post

January 16, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - With this field of losers, it's no
wonder the race for the GOP presidential nomination remains completely
up for grabs.

The only common bond among the Republicans running is that each one has
managed to humiliate himself with disastrous defeats at some point or
another.

These guys have no running game, no passing game, no nothing.

Mike Huckabee got the ball in Iowa and promptly dropped it. John McCain
got it in New Hampshire and fumbled it last night in Michigan.

Now Mitt Romney has the ball and is destined to drop it in South
Carolina on Saturday.

But there's only one GOP candidate that beats all the rest at being a
loser: Rudy Giuliani.

He has perfected the art of underperforming to the point that his
campaign now insists it was all part of his game plan.

He's been reduced to watching from the sidelines and praying for other
people to lose - like McCain in Michigan so his momentum would be
stalled - rather than getting in the game and winning himself.

In fact, Rudy's campaigned so badly that the latest poll shows him
losing New Jersey, which had a front-row seat for his shining moment
during 9/11.

Even fringe candidate Ron Paul - the million-to-one long shot everybody
picks on to make themselves look good - is beating Giuliani.

Paul, who finished ahead of Giuliani in Michigan, currently has twice as
much claim on the Republican nomination as "America's Mayor."

He's picked up two delegates.

Giuliani? He's got just one.

Thank the gods we've got you to tell us how the primaries are going,
Harry. Where do you find these little-known and arcane tidbits,
anyway?

:-)

Chuck, did I miss your admonishment of Harry for posting a political troll?

I'm still waiting to hear your theories about why we haven't been attacked
here since 9/11.

Got any, other than "the war on terror"? What specific aspects?

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:30:09 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

I'm still waiting to hear your theories about why we haven't been attacked
here since 9/11.

Got any, other than "the war on terror"? What specific aspects?


Doug, you lost that one, along with 7 others today.
--
John H

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:30:09 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

I'm still waiting to hear your theories about why we haven't been attacked
here since 9/11.

Got any, other than "the war on terror"? What specific aspects?


Doug, you lost that one, along with 7 others today.
--
John H


Until Bert comes up with an answer, your statement is meaningless, unless
you define refusal to respond as losing. We'll see.