"CalifBill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:55:56 -0800, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:14:53 -0500, BAR wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:09:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
have lost touch with America, read this.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7888.html

Unbelievable.
The Bush legacy includes 9-11, the Katrina aftermath, torture,
secret energy policies, Halliburton, signing statements,
Gonzales,
no WMDs, Blackwater, 4,000 US troops dead, tens of thousands
seriously
wounded or ill, recession, housing meltdown, 40 million without
health
insurance, incredible national debt.
And not one successful attack on the US by Followers of Islam.

Every observer of recent history attributes the lack of attacks to
something
else. What do YOU attribute it to? Please don't say "the war on
terror".
That's too general. Please offer 2-3 specific actions that you feel
have
prevented an attack on U.S. soil.


The war on terror is a global war. Not having an attack on US soil
for
a period of time is pretty much meaningless. You haven't eliminated
or
even subtantially reduced risk to US soil until you have eliminated
terrorism worldwide. If you claim that's not the mission, or that
that
is not possible, then you are stating that the war on terror is
unwinnable. If you want to be picky, and only think you need to
worry
specifically about Americans, their are thousands of American
citizens
all over the world who are also at risk from terrorists.

The war on terrorism is not winnable. Terrorism by its own nature can
rise and fall as the clouds go by. What you have to do is make
examples
of those who become terrorists. Summary executions will help. You
can't
fight the war on terrorism with paper.


The notion of a "war on terror" is laughable. I have news for you. You
can't possibly win it by use of force.



Probably the only way to win is via force. Extreme Force. If a family
sends one of their own as an attacker, kill the complete family. May
not be
PC, but the message will get through very quickly.


That will never accomplish anything other than to create more
terrorists. I
really don't think you understand the situation at all. Really.


He knows what he's been told to think. Isn't that good enough?


And you do not think. Worked for the Russians. And even if it does not
accomplish anything other than removing 20 people that believe in Jihad,
it does accomplish that. 1000 Jihadist == 20,000 fewer Jihadists.



Where do you think it worked for the Russians? Be very specific.

WHERE?