| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
If you don't believe that Democrats...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:11:57 -0000, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:48 -0500, Eisboch wrote: Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is *not* important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously based uprising against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam. Bin Laden may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not that important. If you are saying the jihad will go on without bin Laden, I wouldn't disagree, but that doesn't make bin Laden unimportant. He's more than a symbol. He's the man behind the murder of 3,000 Americans, and the fact that he is still breathing free air says something quite profound about us, doesn't it? Yeah, it says we decided not to invade Pakistan. What's that supposed to mean? That we're honorable for not invading Pakistan? Uh oh. JSB, You and Vic are sounding the ultra Reich Wing Hawks. Nuke them all, let God sort them out. I can't believe anyone would actually use the term RAGHEAD to describe our ally. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you don't believe that Democrats...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:58:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:11:57 -0000, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:48 -0500, Eisboch wrote: Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is *not* important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously based uprising against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam. Bin Laden may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not that important. If you are saying the jihad will go on without bin Laden, I wouldn't disagree, but that doesn't make bin Laden unimportant. He's more than a symbol. He's the man behind the murder of 3,000 Americans, and the fact that he is still breathing free air says something quite profound about us, doesn't it? Yeah, it says we decided not to invade Pakistan. What's that supposed to mean? That we're honorable for not invading Pakistan? Uh oh. Honor was not mentioned in the discussion. Why do you feel it necessary to change the subject? Do you find name-calling and derogatory personal attacks 'honorable'? Don't 'pansy out' on me now. -- John H |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you don't believe that Democrats...
"John H." wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:58:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:11:57 -0000, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:48 -0500, Eisboch wrote: Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is *not* important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously based uprising against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam. Bin Laden may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not that important. If you are saying the jihad will go on without bin Laden, I wouldn't disagree, but that doesn't make bin Laden unimportant. He's more than a symbol. He's the man behind the murder of 3,000 Americans, and the fact that he is still breathing free air says something quite profound about us, doesn't it? Yeah, it says we decided not to invade Pakistan. What's that supposed to mean? That we're honorable for not invading Pakistan? Uh oh. Honor was not mentioned in the discussion. Why do you feel it necessary to change the subject? Do you find name-calling and derogatory personal attacks 'honorable'? Don't 'pansy out' on me now. -- John H I'm not changing the subject. You have a problem with minor detours that most competent adults find perfectly normal in conversations. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you don't believe that Democrats...
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:04:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:58:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:11:57 -0000, wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:19:48 -0500, Eisboch wrote: Have you ever considered that bin Laden, as an individual, is *not* important. What is important is the world-wide, religiously based uprising against anything or anybody not believing in fundamental Islam. Bin Laden may be a vocal centerpiece and symbol, but he by himself is not that important. If you are saying the jihad will go on without bin Laden, I wouldn't disagree, but that doesn't make bin Laden unimportant. He's more than a symbol. He's the man behind the murder of 3,000 Americans, and the fact that he is still breathing free air says something quite profound about us, doesn't it? Yeah, it says we decided not to invade Pakistan. What's that supposed to mean? That we're honorable for not invading Pakistan? Uh oh. Honor was not mentioned in the discussion. Why do you feel it necessary to change the subject? Do you find name-calling and derogatory personal attacks 'honorable'? Don't 'pansy out' on me now. -- John H I'm not changing the subject. You have a problem with minor detours that most competent adults find perfectly normal in conversations. Your 'minor detours' always seem to occur when you've lost another one. -- John H |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Democrats behaving like democrats. | General | |||
| Go Democrats! | ASA | |||
| Don't Know leads the Democrats | ASA | |||
| Bad news for Democrats | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
