| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
If you don't believe that Democrats...
On Jan 16, 12:45*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Jan 16, 11:29 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message news  wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:09:05 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: have lost touch with America, read this. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7888.html Unbelievable. The Bush legacy includes 9-11, the Katrina aftermath, torture, secret energy policies, Halliburton, signing statements, Gonzales, no WMDs, Blackwater, 4,000 US troops dead, tens of thousands seriously wounded or ill, recession, housing meltdown, 40 million without health insurance, incredible national debt. And not one successful attack on the US by Followers of Islam. Every observer of recent history attributes the lack of attacks to something else. What do YOU attribute it to? Please don't say "the war on terror". That's too general. Please offer 2-3 specific actions that you feel have prevented an attack on U.S. soil. The war on terror is a global war. Not having an attack on US soil for a period of time is pretty much meaningless. You haven't eliminated or even subtantially reduced risk to US soil until you have eliminated terrorism worldwide. If you claim that's not the mission, or that that is not possible, then you are stating that the war on terror is unwinnable. If you want to be picky, and only think you need to worry specifically about Americans, their are thousands of American citizens all over the world who are also at risk from terrorists. The war on terrorism is not winnable. Terrorism by its own nature can rise and fall as the clouds go by. What you have to do is make examples of those who become terrorists. Summary executions will help. You can't fight the war on terrorism with paper. OK. But, you said the Bush legacy includes not one successful attack on the US by followers of Islam. This positive thing didn't happen just because Bush is the president. You need to connect it with physical measures taken to prevent the attacks. Can you name 2-3 measures which you believe prevented us from being attacked?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - 1. Because he believes Bush can do no wrong because he's a Republican 2. Rush said so 3. Hannity said so. ======================= Actually, there *were* some measures that may have prevented the attacks, but I need to know which ones Bert is referring to.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Good luck! |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Democrats behaving like democrats. | General | |||
| Go Democrats! | ASA | |||
| Don't Know leads the Democrats | ASA | |||
| Bad news for Democrats | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
