On Jan 14, 5:34*pm, wrote:
On Jan 14, 12:38*pm, wrote:





On Jan 14, 11:14*am, wrote:

On Jan 14, 11:08*am, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:01:02 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Jan 14, 10:55*am, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:32:51 -0800 (PST),

wrote:
On Jan 14, 8:42*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
I have to leave to move some Climate Change off the driveways.

So far this year our snow average has been surpassed by 5 inches.. The
old average was 17, so far we have had 22. Mass has Global Taxing to
the tune of 10 inches above normal average... * * *Just the facts, as
Al Gore doesn't see em'

Weather and climate are two different things. many people confuse
them.

But fraud is still fraud..

???- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I do not trust the numbers, collections systems, and reporting which
supports man made Global Taxing...

Oh, I see. So you don't trust numbers or other data, but you DO trust
what your fellow republicans are telling you, in that global warming
isn't real?

No, if you would get informed you would see that there are as many
scientists against the theories as for, I happen to trust NOAA and
NASA scientists more than UN funded scientists... Nothing to do with
any republican or democratic pundit.


Why would you trust NASA and NOAA scientists more than UN funded
scientists? You don't think they can be corrupted by funding? Also,
you do realize that both NASA and NOAA agree that global warming is
real, don't you? And they also agree that they aren't sure whether man
is causing it or not. They never said man isn't causing it, as you
suggest. Also, there is a NOAA study on Paleoclimatology that shows
very clearly that in the past, when there was warming there was also a
big increase in greenhouse gases that occured naturally via volcanoes,
etc. So, we have evidence that green house gases cause global warming.
We also know that man is now spewing more and more billions of pounds
of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every day. How would you
conclude that this isn't having an affect?