| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
"HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. Bertie looks after Bertie...... Tough **** about anyone else! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. Bertie looks after Bertie...... Tough **** about anyone else! Correct. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. Harry, While I don't believe you represent any corporations or have ever represented any corporations, if you did, you are just as guilty of facilitating them. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. It is not a facilitation it is an agreement. I do what they ask me to do and in return they give me a bag of gold every two weeks. The interesting thing is that I can leave anytime I want with just a moments notice and they can do the same. What could be better? I haven't been fired since I worked at McDonald's as a teenager. When was your most recent termination for cause? |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genmar quits Florida for cheaper labor
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:26:43 -0500, wrote: I don't want to say who is right or wrong but IBM was very clear with me that their job was to return profits to the stockholders, not look out for employees. If the two were not contradictory they did both but when push came to shove, they "shoved" the employee. In my case (and about 20,000 of my peers) that shove was out the door. Then they regeged on most of the promises they made about our retirement. IBM and several other companies like AT&T found themselves with a surplus of highly trained folks left over from the days of electro-mechanical hardware. They tried to retred as many as possible into software development and other related areas but the numbers involved were just too large, and the new generations of all digital equipment were just too reliable and easy to maintain. Translation: We sucked everything out of you we could, now we're cutting you loose and we're not going to keep the commitments we made about your retirement, either. Thank you, and f*ck you. Your Friends The Golden Parachutes at Management and Our Buddies, the Shareholders. I thought you had a sweetheart employment contract at Ullico? Weren't you on the golden boy list at that ah small company? Didn't you get in on some killer stock deals with MCI, Tyco, Enron, and a few others. Isn't that why you can afford the double wide manufactured home in Calvert County? Drinking again? No, I've actually been working hard since 6:30 AM today. My first con-call with my India team. Figures you'd be involved in exporting jobs. Slime. It is my corporate overlords not me who made the decision to off-shore the jobs. But you willingly facilitate them. It is not a facilitation it is an agreement. I do what they ask me to do and in return they give me a bag of gold every two weeks. The interesting thing is that I can leave anytime I want with just a moments notice and they can do the same. What could be better? I haven't been fired since I worked at McDonald's as a teenager. When was your most recent termination for cause? Uh. Never. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Genmar announces Boat Rental/Lease Program | General | |||
| Evinrude quits when it warms up | General | |||
| Genmar hires the GB designer | General | |||
| Engine News from Genmar | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
