Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean
it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the
redistribution would approach equality across the board.


Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think
we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is
getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals.

bb
  #2   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands

bb wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean
it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the
redistribution would approach equality across the board.


Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think
we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is
getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals.

bb



Indeed it is.

BTW, I'm helping in a survey to find any manufacturing or service
companies around the nation that have done any significant amounts of
recent entry-level hiring at decent wages (at least twice minimum wage)
that can be directly related to Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy.

The survey has been ongoing for three weeks. There's not much to report.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

  #3   Report Post  
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
bb wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH
wrote:

The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean
it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the
redistribution would approach equality across the board.


Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think
we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is
getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals.

bb



Indeed it is.

BTW, I'm helping in a survey to find any manufacturing or service
companies around the nation that have done any significant amounts of
recent entry-level hiring at decent wages (at least twice minimum wage)
that can be directly related to Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy.

The survey has been ongoing for three weeks. There's not much to report.


And you would have found even less to report when BJ Clinton reported tremendous
increases in new jobs. as they were all minimum wage.

But of course, that did not bother you then, did it?

  #4   Report Post  
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gould, jps, NOYB, Jim, Harry, and a cast of thousands

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:54:18 GMT, "Jim"
wrote:


And you would have found even less to report when BJ Clinton reported tremendous
increases in new jobs. as they were all minimum wage.


All?

bb
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017