Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH
wrote: The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the redistribution would approach equality across the board. Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals. bb |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bb wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH wrote: The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the redistribution would approach equality across the board. Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals. bb Indeed it is. BTW, I'm helping in a survey to find any manufacturing or service companies around the nation that have done any significant amounts of recent entry-level hiring at decent wages (at least twice minimum wage) that can be directly related to Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. The survey has been ongoing for three weeks. There's not much to report. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... bb wrote: On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:58:42 -0400, JohnH wrote: The fact that redistribution occurs now doesn't mean it's not a socialist concept. If you, and other socialists, had your way the redistribution would approach equality across the board. Isn't the distribution of wealth going the other way, fast? I think we've got a situation where a larger percentage of the wealth is getting concentrated into fewer and fewer individuals. bb Indeed it is. BTW, I'm helping in a survey to find any manufacturing or service companies around the nation that have done any significant amounts of recent entry-level hiring at decent wages (at least twice minimum wage) that can be directly related to Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. The survey has been ongoing for three weeks. There's not much to report. And you would have found even less to report when BJ Clinton reported tremendous increases in new jobs. as they were all minimum wage. But of course, that did not bother you then, did it? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 22:54:18 GMT, "Jim"
wrote: And you would have found even less to report when BJ Clinton reported tremendous increases in new jobs. as they were all minimum wage. All? bb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|