NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains. I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States should be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth."

"In it's simplest form, socialism is forced distribution of wealth." (Harry
Krause, February 2000)

Old age getting to your memory?

So you believe that individuals should have to take a test before they vote
or even to speak. Sounds like the old Jim Crow laws.

Scary that anyone would make a suggestion like that in 2003.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is
when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains.
I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in
some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the
exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States should
be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:58:24 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains. I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States should be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

Harry, I hate to say it, 'cause I try to remain neutral, but you've been 'got'
by NYOB!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 10:58:24 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Chris wrote:

"Jim" is a horse's ass.


And you're a piece of ****.

Make that a lying piece of ****.
In fact, the only time I know for sure you've told the truth is when
you
admitted to being a socialist.



I don't recall "admitting" to being a socialist, feces-for-brains. I'm
actually a moderate, yellow-dog Democrat. But I certainly find very
little wrong with the brand of democratic socialism practiced in some
northern European nations.


You *did* admit that you're a socialist. You just didn't use the exact
words "I'm a Socialist". Maybe this will jar your memory:

Do you believe that the income tax system in the United States should be
used
for redistribution of the wealth?


Harry's answer: "Yup"


And, indeed, our progressive tax system does redistribute wealth.


But awhile ago you defined "Socialism" as the "forced redistribution of
wealth". Now, you say you support such a system. That makes you a
Socialist. You fit your very own definition!




K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

Harry, I hate to say it, 'cause I try to remain neutral, but you've been 'got'
by NYOB!

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


Yeah, sure, John...as if any of you righties individually or
collectively had the ability...




--
* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.

Harry Krause wrote in message
K-ripes, are you really as simple-minded as you come across here, or is
it an act? I never defined socialism as "forced redistribution of
wealth." The current income tax system in the USA "forces"
redistribution of wealth. Are you claiming the USA is socialist?

Idiots like you should be forced to take an exam before being allowed to
vote. Or speak.

Harry, he just doesn't get it! Been watching this thread, and in
particular, your replies to his questions, and he just doesn't
understand what you are saying. Pretty damned funny, if you ask me!