| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
....and whoever's playing Dallas.
So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Dec 30, 6:42*pm, John H. wrote:
...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Dallas..... the only team that would hire that loud mouth buffoon TO. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
|
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
John H. wrote:
...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! I just wish Dallas has shown up in more than body yesterday. Sadly the game's only outcome was the rivalry. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 07:59:39 -0500, BAR wrote:
John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! I just wish Dallas has shown up in more than body yesterday. Sadly the game's only outcome was the rivalry. As I'm no aficionado, I'll take what I can get. It was an enjoyable way to sit in front of the fire during miserable weather. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Dec 30, 3:42�pm, John H. wrote:
...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Dec 31, 1:13�pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold.. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let me know if you come to town, we'll go for a boat ride. :-) Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. If there is anything more boring than watching pro football, it is guys discussing pro football. I wonder if there is a way to turn footballs into fishing floats. -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:56:37 -0500, HK wrote:
If there is anything more boring than watching pro football, it is guys discussing pro football. Why Harry - I've never seen you express that opinion before. Not once. Ever. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Dec 31, 1:13?pm, John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let me know if you come to town, we'll go for a boat ride. :-) Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. You're probably right, but I think the crap weather helped the 'skins against Dallas. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:42:47 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. Damn, I learn something new every day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. You guys should upsize those puny american footballs. Our balls are bigger than yours! Heck.. even our fields & end zones are bigger. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. Comparison chart... http://www.13thman.com/cflvsnfl.html |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Dec 31, 5:59*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:iunin3t7ojgqvit9bjj9ltsaocelt6122u@4ax .com... On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. *American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. You guys should upsize those puny american footballs. Our balls are bigger than yours! Heck.. even our fields & end zones are bigger.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And still.... no one cares...;) Don't see much of it on network TV. Them guys making any loonies are they?? Maybe they just play for the shower after ;) Canadidididians..... |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Dec 31, 6:02*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:iunin3t7ojgqvit9bjj9ltsaocelt6122u@4ax .com... On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. *American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. Comparison chart... * * *http://www.13thman.com/cflvsnfl.html- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And still... no one watches ;) |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:56:37 -0500, HK wrote: If there is anything more boring than watching pro football, it is guys discussing pro football. Why Harry - I've never seen you express that opinion before. Not once. Ever. Harry is shifting into his pre-election mode. He'll return to normal after Huckabee is elected. Eisboch |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:29:36 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:56:37 -0500, HK wrote: If there is anything more boring than watching pro football, it is guys discussing pro football. Why Harry - I've never seen you express that opinion before. Not once. Ever. Harry is shifting into his pre-election mode. He'll return to normal after Huckabee is elected. Eisboch Never noticed much difference. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. A lot of teams do that if the weather is going to be questionable. People don't realise this, but the problem with throwing a wet weather football isn't the grip - it's the weight. American footballs are made with a special patented Chemical process called Grip-Tite and grip is further enhanced by the special pebbling process used when the leather is tanned and formed. Under certain conditions, an American football can gain as much as 6 ounces of weight. Which is not to say that wet, cold footballs don't have gripping problems, but the main problem is the variable weight. If there is anything more boring than watching pro football, it is guys discussing pro football. I wonder if there is a way to turn footballs into fishing floats. You don't have to respond, asshole. Again you are in the minority. Get over it an shut the **** up. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:29:36 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
He'll return to normal after Huckabee is elected. Nah. First we'd have to listen to years of whining about how Huckabee stole the election. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 31, 1:13?pm, John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let me know if you come to town, we'll go for a boat ride. :-) Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. You're probably right, but I think the crap weather helped the 'skins against Dallas. Dallas already had home field advantage sewn up and the game didn't mean anything to Dallas except for pride and injury. That last play of the first half almost cost Dallas their QB. Letting TO sit on the sidelines was smart too, let him heal for the 2nd round of playoffs. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:42:29 -0500, BAR wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 31, 1:13?pm, John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let me know if you come to town, we'll go for a boat ride. :-) Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. You're probably right, but I think the crap weather helped the 'skins against Dallas. Dallas already had home field advantage sewn up and the game didn't mean anything to Dallas except for pride and injury. That last play of the first half almost cost Dallas their QB. Letting TO sit on the sidelines was smart too, let him heal for the 2nd round of playoffs. I'll bet you dollars-to-donuts that Dallas doens't make it out of the first round. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:07:55 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I'll bet you dollars-to-donuts that Dallas doens't make it out of the first round. Well, they already have. They have a first week bye. ;-) |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
|
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:42:29 -0500, BAR wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 31, 1:13?pm, John H. wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:20:49 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Good luck next weekend. Your revitalized Redskins are on a roll, but you've drawn the Seahawks in the first playoff round. Seattle lost one game at home all season, (and just barely). It should be an interesting matchup. We learned yesterday that Seattle's second string can't even beat the 2-13 Falcons, so if the starters don't show up in good health and with their "A" game on your team could add at least one more game to the micaculous run with which they ended the regular season. My brother's wanting me to fly out and watch the game with him. Says he'll feed me dinner and buy all the beer. Of course, he knows I don't drink. Miraculous is definitely the right word. We're all wondering where the hell the team has been hiding. Hopefully, the weather will be very wet and cold. The 'Skins like that. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let me know if you come to town, we'll go for a boat ride. :-) Wet and cold won't favor either team. Did you know the 'Hawks practice with a wet football? They dunk it into a garbage can filled with water before every practice snap. More accurately replicates the usual playing conditions. You're probably right, but I think the crap weather helped the 'skins against Dallas. Dallas already had home field advantage sewn up and the game didn't mean anything to Dallas except for pride and injury. That last play of the first half almost cost Dallas their QB. Letting TO sit on the sidelines was smart too, let him heal for the 2nd round of playoffs. I'll bet you dollars-to-donuts that Dallas doens't make it out of the first round. I don't want to think about it. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:38:26 -0500, BAR wrote:
I'll bet you dollars-to-donuts that Dallas doens't make it out of the first round. I don't want to think about it. Darn - I was looking forward to donuts. :) |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:38:26 -0500, BAR wrote: I'll bet you dollars-to-donuts that Dallas doens't make it out of the first round. I don't want to think about it. Darn - I was looking forward to donuts. :) Been there done that. I paid that bet off last month. I bet a co-worker at 4400 Computer Drive that the Cowboys would beat the Patriots. I had to deliver a Box of Joe and a couple doz of DD's finest to her desk. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote:
4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. :) |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Jan 2, 5:55*am, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote: 4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. *:) Bastan... |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote: 4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. :) We call it the Mother Ship now. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
|
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:13:00 -0500, BAR wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote: 4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. :) We call it the Mother Ship now. We used to call it The Hanger when Ed was trying to build his Air Force. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:13:00 -0500, BAR wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote: 4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. :) We call it the Mother Ship now. We used to call it The Hanger when Ed was trying to build his Air Force. The parking lot is big enough to land a 747. |
Two favorite teams - the Redskins...
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:54:55 -0500, BAR wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:13:00 -0500, BAR wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:20:12 -0500, BAR wrote: 4400 Computer Drive I recognize that address. :) We call it the Mother Ship now. We used to call it The Hanger when Ed was trying to build his Air Force. The parking lot is big enough to land a 747. You should have been there when we built the tower. That was a freakin' riot. |
Yo, John H (was 2 favorite teams)
On Dec 30 2007, 3:42�pm, John H.
wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Well played! Fortunately for Seattle, the victory is awarded to the team that scores the most points. If the game had been determined by who played the better football, the outcome should have been much closer than the final score. |
Yo, John H (was 2 favorite teams)
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:04:08 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Dec 30 2007, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Well played! Fortunately for Seattle, the victory is awarded to the team that scores the most points. If the game had been determined by who played the better football, the outcome should have been much closer than the final score. Perhaps I'm bitter, but I didn't think it was well played at all. The Redskins blew too many opportunities and made too many stupid mistakes to win that game. Seattle played well, or at least they didn't shoot themselves in the foot at every opportunity. I can't even blame it on the officiating, pro-Seattle that it was. :) Good game, Chuck. Now I have to figure out how to finance the money I lost to my brothers out there. Crap. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Yo, John H (was 2 favorite teams)
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:04:08 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30 2007, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Well played! Fortunately for Seattle, the victory is awarded to the team that scores the most points. If the game had been determined by who played the better football, the outcome should have been much closer than the final score. Perhaps I'm bitter, but I didn't think it was well played at all. The Redskins blew too many opportunities and made too many stupid mistakes to win that game. Seattle played well, or at least they didn't shoot themselves in the foot at every opportunity. I can't even blame it on the officiating, pro-Seattle that it was. :) Good game, Chuck. Now I have to figure out how to finance the money I lost to my brothers out there. Crap. Can we stoke the fires of a quarterback controversy now or do we wait until August? |
Yo, John H (was 2 favorite teams)
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:14:01 -0500, John H.
wrote: I can't even blame it on the officiating, pro-Seattle that it was. :) ROTFL!! |
Yo, John H (was 2 favorite teams)
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:28:23 -0500, BAR wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:04:08 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30 2007, 3:42?pm, John H. wrote: ...and whoever's playing Dallas. So far, today is a good day! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Well played! Fortunately for Seattle, the victory is awarded to the team that scores the most points. If the game had been determined by who played the better football, the outcome should have been much closer than the final score. Perhaps I'm bitter, but I didn't think it was well played at all. The Redskins blew too many opportunities and made too many stupid mistakes to win that game. Seattle played well, or at least they didn't shoot themselves in the foot at every opportunity. I can't even blame it on the officiating, pro-Seattle that it was. :) Good game, Chuck. Now I have to figure out how to finance the money I lost to my brothers out there. Crap. Can we stoke the fires of a quarterback controversy now or do we wait until August? Let's wait. My wife was in tears last night. I was just ****ed. I suppose we'll never know whether to blame Collins or Moss for that one TD, but it makes little difference. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com