BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Yo!! Chuck... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/89096-yo-chuck.html)

Short Wave Sportfishing December 22nd 07 01:34 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ

via...

http://www.iambossy.com/

Chuck Gould December 22nd 07 08:27 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 21, 5:34�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. �:)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ

via...

http://www.iambossy.com/



I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

Short Wave Sportfishing December 22nd 07 12:09 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ

via...

http://www.iambossy.com/



I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


Chuck - it was a joke. A set up and then the joke.

Tim December 22nd 07 01:44 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 22, 6:09*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ


via...


http://www.iambossy.com/


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.


Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.


http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


Chuck - it was a joke. *A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".

Anyhow! We'll get our PURGE coming after you but we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!

John H. December 22nd 07 01:46 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ

via...

http://www.iambossy.com/



I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

John H. December 22nd 07 01:49 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 22, 6:09*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ


via...


http://www.iambossy.com/


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.


Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.


http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


Chuck - it was a joke. *A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".

Anyhow! We'll get our PURGE coming after you but we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!


Tim, you're supposed to sleep in on Saturday.

Good morning! In about an hour the kids and the grandkids are going to show
up to celebrate Christmas at Oma & Opa's house. This is the part I love,
the big get together. I suppose the anti-Christian crowd will just have to
do without, and that's a shame.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

HK December 22nd 07 01:52 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:09 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ
via...
http://www.iambossy.com/
I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

Chuck - it was a joke. A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".

Anyhow! We'll get our PURGE coming after you but we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!



Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in
Iran or in Alabama.

The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.

John H. December 22nd 07 01:57 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 08:52:26 -0500, HK wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:09 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ
via...
http://www.iambossy.com/
I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm
Chuck - it was a joke. A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".

Anyhow! We'll get our PURGE coming after you but we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!



Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in
Iran or in Alabama.

The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.


When you, Chuck, and Larry are sharing a room in the afterlife, you'll be
able to put down Christians ad nauseum. It'll be like a little slice of
heaven, Harry.

In the meantime, you might consider Costa Rica!
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Tim December 22nd 07 02:02 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 22, 7:49*am, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:09*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould


wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ


via...


http://www.iambossy.com/


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.


Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.


http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


Chuck - it was a joke. *A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Awwww *Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! * "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".


Anyhow! * We'll get our PURGE coming after you but *we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. *So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! *See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! *Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!


Tim, you're supposed to sleep in on Saturday.

Good morning! In about an hour the kids and the grandkids are going to show
up to celebrate Christmas at Oma & Opa's house. This is the part I love,
the big get together. I suppose the anti-Christian crowd will just have to
do without, and that's a shame.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yeah John, ain't it great? My son's here from Tenn. with wife and baby
boy. Yep, they're here with Grandpa and Grandma and Aunt
Krystine...The other son , wife and three kids were here last night
wrecking out our house,so we were packed, but had a blast!

That's why I had to get up early to get some coffee rolling, then I
made the horrible mistake of checking in on wrecked.boats, and saw
Toms blasphemies, so that got my blood boiling, that he ruined my
whole day, and now I have to dig out my "Fundamentalist Defense Kit"
and concentrate on portotecting "Christian Values across America."

Tom, couldn't you have at least waited till after the holidays for
that???

BAR December 22nd 07 02:10 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
HK wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:09 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ
via...
http://www.iambossy.com/
I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm
Chuck - it was a joke. A set up and then the joke.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad.. OOOPS!
No, I regret that words been taken already, I like the sound of
"jihad", its better than "purge". But oh well, like the saying goes
you "run what you brung".

Anyhow! We'll get our PURGE coming after you but we'll probably
stop off and deal with Illuminati Larry on the way out there. So be
prepared to be purged, Now I wish you hand't done this offense Tom,
Now I have to go find my white sheetrobe and cone hat. And now I'll
have to dig up all the verses to the Battle Hymn of the Republic too,
I mean after all, it takes a good while for a body to be burned at the
stake. i got a lot of singing to do! See what you put me thought,
Tom? Some days it's best just to stay in bed, but no! Now you've made
be get up ponder my duties as a "REAL" Christian!



Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.


We don't have a secular, non-sectarian society.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in
Iran or in Alabama.


What about the secular humanists who deny science.

The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.


Fundamentalism, regardless of which belief system is a bad things.

Are you going to go pray at the alter of the Goracle this morning?

HK December 22nd 07 02:13 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad..


you don't have to *start* anything you can just join.... it is already
underway about 30 miles from here.....
http://www.freexsc.blogspot.com/



My experience tells me that the more a group loudly proclaims its
"Christianity," the less it follows the teachings of Jesus.

Is anyone keeping an eye on that group? They sound very scary. I bet
they are raping little girls in the name of religion. Seem like the type.

Tim December 22nd 07 03:00 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 


Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


Awwww Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad..


you don't have to *start* anything you can just join.... it is already
underway about 30 miles from here.....
http://www.freexsc.blogspot.com/


Gene, how'd you know where the reinforcements were coming from....?

Tim December 22nd 07 03:07 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 


HK wrote:



Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in
Iran or in Alabama.


You're paranoia runneth deep Harry. (King James Version Englishe),
The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a
few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.


Yes, we "fundie/Bu****es" are deffinately to be feared, Harry.. only
one problem with your last line,, i thought it was us who were going
to be doing the slaughtering!


HK December 22nd 07 03:22 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Tim wrote:

HK wrote:


Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you are in
Iran or in Alabama.


You're paranoia runneth deep Harry. (King James Version Englishe),
The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a
few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq, and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.


Yes, we "fundie/Bu****es" are deffinately to be feared, Harry.. only
one problem with your last line,, i thought it was us who were going
to be doing the slaughtering!



Ahh. Well, "to slaughter" can be interpreted several ways. I could have
said, "...ready to slaughter others." Probably should have, because that
is what I meant.

Whatever. I still don't see much difference between the religious
simpies in Muslimland and the religious simpies in this country, other
than the Muslim religious simpies have been at it longer. Oh, and please
don't think I am throwing "all" Christians into the "religious simpies"
group. I'm not.

Lu Powell December 22nd 07 03:40 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 

"HK" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:

HK wrote:


Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big
joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of
followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have
here
in this country.

When you have "religious groups" denying science, limiting medical
research, teaching creationism (cretinism, actually), proclaiming
Jesus
or Mohammed or whoever, voting for candidates based solely on their
religious beliefs, in the end, it doesn't matter much whether you
are in
Iran or in Alabama.


You're paranoia runneth deep Harry. (King James Version Englishe),
The "fundie" Christians in this country are a few years behind and a
few
millions followers lighter than the "fundie" Muslims in Iran, Iraq,
and
Saudi Arabia. They'll catch up. In the end, they're all the same
simple-minded rabble, ready to be led and ready to slaughter.


Yes, we "fundie/Bu****es" are deffinately to be feared, Harry.. only
one problem with your last line,, i thought it was us who were going
to be doing the slaughtering!



Ahh. Well, "to slaughter" can be interpreted several ways. I could
have said, "...ready to slaughter others." Probably should have,
because that is what I meant.

Whatever. I still don't see much difference between the religious
simpies in Muslimland and the religious simpies in this country, other
than the Muslim religious simpies have been at it longer. Oh, and
please don't think I am throwing "all" Christians into the "religious
simpies" group. I'm not.


Please don't feed the troll....



Chuck Gould December 22nd 07 05:41 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 22, 5:46�am, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ


via...


http://www.iambossy.com/


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.


Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.


http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.

HK December 22nd 07 05:47 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 22, 5:46�am, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:27:27 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould





wrote:
On Dec 21, 5:34?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Here 'ya go - should keep you busy for a while. ?:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ
via...
http://www.iambossy.com/
I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.



Herring and a few others seem to be overly sensitive about certain
religious matters.

There's much to admire about Joshua, aka Jesus, whether he was real or
not. On the other hand, I find very little to admire in fundamentalist
Christianity because of its insularity, its attempts to convert, and its
small-mindedness.

Why Herring takes that personally I do not know.

Chuck Gould December 22nd 07 05:49 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 22, 6:06�am, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

Awwww �Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! � "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad..


you don't have to *start* anything you can just join.... it is already
underway about 30 miles from here.....http://www.freexsc.blogspot.com/

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats� � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 071221-0, 12/21/2007
Tested on: 12/22/2007 9:06:55 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com


Here's a site sponsored by a few more folks down that way.

It seems they're all dreaming of a white Christmas. Same old
hatful message, just covered up by a new sheet.

http://www.kkk.bz/

These folks are not representative of mainstream fundamentalism, but
responsible fundamentalists might want to keep a weather eye peeled to
be sure this kind of nonsense doesn't sneak through the church door
along with the majority of the congregation.

RLM December 22nd 07 06:35 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:10:41 -0500, BAR wrote:

Snip

What about the secular humanists who deny science.


You have been duped by the Rude Limpballs radio program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_humanism



Tim December 22nd 07 09:04 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 22, 11:49Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 22, 6:06�am, Gene Kearns
wrote:





On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:44:27 -0800 (PST), Tim penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:


Awwww �Tom, you made a joke about ....Jesus! � "Now I'll be forced to
get a bunch of fundamentalist christians and start a jihad..


you don't have to *start* anything you can just join.... it is already
underway about 30 miles from here.....http://www.freexsc.blogspot.com/


--


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.


Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/�� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �


Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats�� � � � � � � � � � � � � �


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 071221-0, 12/21/2007
Tested on: 12/22/2007 9:06:55 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com


Here's a site sponsored by a few more folks down that way.

It seems they're all dreaming of a white Christmas. Same old
hatful message, just covered up by a new sheet.

http://www.kkk.bz/

These folks are not representative of mainstream fundamentalism, but
responsible fundamentalists might want to keep a weather eye peeled to
be sure this kind of nonsense doesn't sneak through the church door
along with the majority of the congregation.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Chuck, these guys are pretty well off by themselves, fairly well does
anybody in any and every type of mainstream Christianity knows that
the 3-K are a bunch of loons, and with all due respect, I don't
personally know of anyone who would want to associate with them, or
their beliefs. Same way with Fred Phelps and his Westboro "Baptist"
church and their desperate publicity schemes of http://www.godhatesamerica.com/index.html

Sure, like every other religion there are some whacks out there that
no one really takes seriously, thats why they pull outragious stunts
just to get noticed. BTW, I absolutely support smacking Phelps and
his ilk with the $10 mil. law suit. I wish it had been higher. He's a
crank.

Dan December 23rd 07 12:42 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
HK wrote:


Some of us don't think "fundamentalist" Christianity is such a big joke.
Any sort of religious fundamentalism with growing numbers of followers
is a threat to the sort of secular, non-sectarian society we have here
in this country.


Some of us think your boat ownership claims are a *HUGE* joke. Somehow
you are compelled to avoid that topic in a boating newsgroup.

John H. December 23rd 07 10:51 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:47:33 -0500, HK wrote:




Herring and a few others seem to be overly sensitive about certain
religious matters.

There's much to admire about Joshua, aka Jesus, whether he was real or
not. On the other hand, I find very little to admire in fundamentalist
Christianity because of its insularity, its attempts to convert, and its
small-mindedness.

Why Herring takes that personally I do not know.


Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

John H. December 23rd 07 11:01 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.


Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.


http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm


OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.


You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS. I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.


--
John H

Short Wave Sportfishing December 23rd 07 11:13 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.


You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS. I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.


What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.

Set up.

Joke.

I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.

Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. :)

Tim December 23rd 07 11:19 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 


I know what you mean..... however, these guys have it right..... *:-)

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/



[shaking my head in amazement!]

Eisboch December 23rd 07 11:23 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:47:33 -0500, HK wrote:




Herring and a few others seem to be overly sensitive about certain
religious matters.

There's much to admire about Joshua, aka Jesus, whether he was real or
not. On the other hand, I find very little to admire in fundamentalist
Christianity because of its insularity, its attempts to convert, and its
small-mindedness.

Why Herring takes that personally I do not know.


Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--
John H



I agree with that. Religious beliefs (or lack of) is a personal thing and
really is nobody's else's business. I've known some fundamentalist
Christians and have been approached regarding joining in their faith (saving
souls is part of their belief structure). A gentle, but firm "no thank you"
is all that is required to end the discussion. We remain friends.

Eisboch




John H. December 23rd 07 11:39 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:13:40 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife. That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.


You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS. I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.


What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.

Set up.

Joke.

I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.

Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. :)


Well, you have to be a little understanding. There are some who simply
aren't able to tell something is a joke. There were those who actually
believed I had tried the Purina Dog Food Diet.

Because you are discerning enough to recognize humor, I'll share this with
you (it was sent to me as the best joke of the year).

**********************
A Somali arrives in Minneapolis as a new immigrant to the United States.
He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank
you Mr. American for letting me in this country, giving me housing, food
stamps, free medical care, and free education!"

The passerby says, "You are mistaken, I am Mexican."

The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having
such a beautiful country here in America and giving me free education and
medical care!"

The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."

The new arrival walks further, and the next person he sees he stops,
Shakes his hand and says, "Thank you for the wonderful America, my
wonderful
housing and food stamps!"

That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East, I am not
American!"

He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?"

She says, "No, I am from Africa!"

Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"

The lady checks her watch and says.."Probably at work."





--
John H

John H. December 23rd 07 11:59 AM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:19:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:



I know what you mean..... however, these guys have it right..... *:-)

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/



[shaking my head in amazement!]


I wonder if anyone would have the balls to do the same with Islam as the
subject.
--
John H

HK December 23rd 07 01:14 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Eisboch wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:47:33 -0500, HK wrote:



Herring and a few others seem to be overly sensitive about certain
religious matters.

There's much to admire about Joshua, aka Jesus, whether he was real or
not. On the other hand, I find very little to admire in fundamentalist
Christianity because of its insularity, its attempts to convert, and its
small-mindedness.

Why Herring takes that personally I do not know.

Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--
John H



I agree with that. Religious beliefs (or lack of) is a personal thing and
really is nobody's else's business. I've known some fundamentalist
Christians and have been approached regarding joining in their faith (saving
souls is part of their belief structure). A gentle, but firm "no thank you"
is all that is required to end the discussion. We remain friends.

Eisboch





That's the whole point. Many Christian religious fundies, just like
Muslim counterparts, want to make *their* religion *your* business, and
if they are not doing it personally, on a one to one basis, they are
doing it by trying to force their beliefs onto society as a whole.

A pox on them to the thousandth generation!

John H. December 23rd 07 01:39 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:44:26 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:59:21 -0500, John H. penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:19:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:



I know what you mean..... however, these guys have it right..... *:-)

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/



[shaking my head in amazement!]


I wonder if anyone would have the balls to do the same with Islam as the
subject.


Kinda like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQB85J_b2AY


Funny! But you notice the word Muslim was used only twice, with *no*
derogatory connotations.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

John H. December 23rd 07 01:43 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:14:27 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:47:33 -0500, HK wrote:



Herring and a few others seem to be overly sensitive about certain
religious matters.

There's much to admire about Joshua, aka Jesus, whether he was real or
not. On the other hand, I find very little to admire in fundamentalist
Christianity because of its insularity, its attempts to convert, and its
small-mindedness.

Why Herring takes that personally I do not know.
Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--
John H



I agree with that. Religious beliefs (or lack of) is a personal thing and
really is nobody's else's business. I've known some fundamentalist
Christians and have been approached regarding joining in their faith (saving
souls is part of their belief structure). A gentle, but firm "no thank you"
is all that is required to end the discussion. We remain friends.

Eisboch





That's the whole point. Many Christian religious fundies, just like
Muslim counterparts, want to make *their* religion *your* business, and
if they are not doing it personally, on a one to one basis, they are
doing it by trying to force their beliefs onto society as a whole.

A pox on them to the thousandth generation!


Don't unions recruit? They did in the school in which I taught. Don't they
try to force their beliefs on society as a whole?

You, Harry, have the power within you to 'just say no'. Being derogatory
and belittling does nothing for your cause.


--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

HK December 23rd 07 01:46 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:44:26 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:59:21 -0500, John H. penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:19:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

I know what you mean..... however, these guys have it right..... :-)

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/


[shaking my head in amazement!]
I wonder if anyone would have the balls to do the same with Islam as the
subject.

Kinda like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQB85J_b2AY


Funny! But you notice the word Muslim was used only twice, with *no*
derogatory connotations.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*



So? What's your point?

John H. December 23rd 07 02:06 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:46:56 -0500, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:44:26 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:59:21 -0500, John H. penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:19:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

I know what you mean..... however, these guys have it right..... :-)

http://www.landoverbaptist.org/


[shaking my head in amazement!]
I wonder if anyone would have the balls to do the same with Islam as the
subject.
Kinda like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQB85J_b2AY


Funny! But you notice the word Muslim was used only twice, with *no*
derogatory connotations.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*



So? What's your point?


Come on, Harry. Someone with your imagination should be able to figure it
out with very little effort.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Don White December 23rd 07 02:35 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:13:40 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.

Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly
on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted
by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm

OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife.
That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that
may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -


What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.

You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS.
I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply
because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same
as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a
religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is
proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.


What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.

Set up.

Joke.

I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.

Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. :)


Well, you have to be a little understanding. There are some who simply
aren't able to tell something is a joke. There were those who actually
believed I had tried the Purina Dog Food Diet.

Because you are discerning enough to recognize humor, I'll share this with
you (it was sent to me as the best joke of the year).

**********************
A Somali arrives in Minneapolis as a new immigrant to the United States.
He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank
you Mr. American for letting me in this country, giving me housing, food
stamps, free medical care, and free education!"

The passerby says, "You are mistaken, I am Mexican."

The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having
such a beautiful country here in America and giving me free education and
medical care!"

The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."

The new arrival walks further, and the next person he sees he stops,
Shakes his hand and says, "Thank you for the wonderful America, my
wonderful
housing and food stamps!"

That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East, I am not
American!"

He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?"

She says, "No, I am from Africa!"

Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"

The lady checks her watch and says.."Probably at work."


John H



Oh boy! We should ask your family to send you on a sensitivity course as a
suitable Christmas present this year.



HK December 23rd 07 02:43 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:13:40 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly
on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted
by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm
OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife.
That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that
may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.
You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS.
I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply
because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same
as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a
religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is
proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.
What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.

Set up.

Joke.

I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.

Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. :)

Well, you have to be a little understanding. There are some who simply
aren't able to tell something is a joke. There were those who actually
believed I had tried the Purina Dog Food Diet.

Because you are discerning enough to recognize humor, I'll share this with
you (it was sent to me as the best joke of the year).

**********************
A Somali arrives in Minneapolis as a new immigrant to the United States.
He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank
you Mr. American for letting me in this country, giving me housing, food
stamps, free medical care, and free education!"

The passerby says, "You are mistaken, I am Mexican."

The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having
such a beautiful country here in America and giving me free education and
medical care!"

The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."

The new arrival walks further, and the next person he sees he stops,
Shakes his hand and says, "Thank you for the wonderful America, my
wonderful
housing and food stamps!"

That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East, I am not
American!"

He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?"

She says, "No, I am from Africa!"

Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"

The lady checks her watch and says.."Probably at work."


John H



Oh boy! We should ask your family to send you on a sensitivity course as a
suitable Christmas present this year.



I've "re-engineered" my newsgroup black hole filter, and already have a
couple of stenchmongers in it. Herring is tettering on the event
horizon. I don't have any interest in his golfing, grandchildren,
children, Disney cruises, or religion, and he has nothing to add in the
way of boating or fishing threads, so he's on his way to join D.F. Dan
and one or two others.

Reginald P. Smithers III[_5_] December 23rd 07 04:04 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Dec 23, 9:43*am, HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:13:40 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:


On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:


On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly
on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted
by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm
OK, Chuck!


I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife.
That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that
may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H


*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted
text -


- Show quoted text -


What a bizarre remark.


Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.


I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.


How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!


Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.


I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)


A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.
You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS.
I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply
because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.


I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same
as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a
religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is
proffered.


Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.
What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.


Set up.


Joke.


I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.


Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. *:)
Well, you have to be a little understanding. There are some who simply
aren't able to tell something is a joke. There were those who actually
believed I had tried the Purina Dog Food Diet.


Because you are discerning enough to recognize humor, I'll share this with
you (it was sent to me as the best joke of the year).


**********************
A Somali arrives in Minneapolis as a new immigrant to the United States..
He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank
you Mr. American for letting me in this country, giving me housing, food
stamps, free medical care, and free education!"


The passerby says, "You are mistaken, I am Mexican."


The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having
such a beautiful country here in America and giving me free education and
medical care!"


The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."


The new arrival walks further, and the next person he sees he stops,
Shakes his hand and says, "Thank you for the wonderful America, my
wonderful
housing and food stamps!"


That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East, I am not
American!"


He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?"


She says, "No, I am from Africa!"


Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"


The lady checks her watch and says.."Probably at work."


John H


Oh boy! * We should ask your family to send you on a sensitivity course as a
suitable Christmas present this year.


I've "re-engineered" my newsgroup black hole filter, and already have a
couple of stenchmongers in it. Herring is tettering on the event
horizon. I don't have any interest in his golfing, grandchildren,
children, Disney cruises, or religion, and he has nothing to add in the
way of boating or fishing threads, so he's on his way to join D.F. Dan
and one or two others.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Does it take a lot of computer skills to engineer a NG black hole
filter?


John H. December 23rd 07 04:36 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:43:00 -0500, HK wrote:

Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:13:40 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:01:43 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:41:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:


I guess people are free to interpret "IHS" any way that is personally
meaningful.
Of notable interest; the Catholic church had pretty much a monopoly
on
organized Christianity for the longest time, especially during the
middle ages. According to their encyclopedia, the translation noted
by
the author of the Wiki article is a "wrong understanding". Doesn't
mean that some folks don't see it the same way as the Wiki writer,
however.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07649a.htm
OK, Chuck!

I will pray that you, Harry, and Larry share a room in the afterlife.
That
should make you happy. You won't have to put up with us lowlifes that
may
have some beliefs you would like to belittle.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

What a bizarre remark.

Tom dropped some cite about the hidden meaning of IHS.

I noted that the Catholic encyclopedia disagreed with his reference.

How does that belittle your belief? Good grief man, I referred to the
Catholic Encyclopedia as a probable authority on the matter!

Catholic traditions offer one of the better insights into orthodox
Western spiritual beliefs of the middle ages- Catholicism was the only
major game in town, and pretty well ran the government. The Roman
church can be credited with preserving some carefully selected schools
of thought and knowledge during a time of rampant illiteracy and when
Europeans placed little value on a classical eduation.

I can't believe you read my post carefully or bothered to follow the
link.
It seems like you are (over) reacting to what you presume I am going
to
state rather than what I actually post. If you kneel to pray in the
next few days, try to do so on the knee that doesn't jerk as
badly. :-)

A Joyous Yuletide to you and all your house.
You know what? You are correct. I read Tom's reference to 'Jesus H.
Christ', which I took to be jocular, and then saw your reference to IHS.
I
saw *no* connection between Tom's comment and your comment, simply
because
I didn't read Tom's reference much beyond the first paragraph.

I did not bother to follow your link, thinking that it would be the same
as
your other 'religious' links, designed to belittle or ridicule a
religious
belief. I now see that, in this case, I was wrong. My apology is
proffered.

Thanks for the wishes. Merry Christmas to you and yours and wishes for a
great New Year.
What is really funny is that the mostly humorless Chuck took it
entirely wrong.

Set up.

Joke.

I have said many times that this is the one NG where humor is a
forgotten art and I'm begining to see it as my mission in life to
lighten things up.

Of course this is all casting pearls before swine, but what the heck -
got for it anyway because that's how I roll. :)
Well, you have to be a little understanding. There are some who simply
aren't able to tell something is a joke. There were those who actually
believed I had tried the Purina Dog Food Diet.

Because you are discerning enough to recognize humor, I'll share this with
you (it was sent to me as the best joke of the year).

**********************
A Somali arrives in Minneapolis as a new immigrant to the United States.
He stops the first person he sees walking down the street and says, "Thank
you Mr. American for letting me in this country, giving me housing, food
stamps, free medical care, and free education!"

The passerby says, "You are mistaken, I am Mexican."

The man goes on and encounters another passerby. "Thank you for having
such a beautiful country here in America and giving me free education and
medical care!"

The person says, "I not American, I Vietnamese."

The new arrival walks further, and the next person he sees he stops,
Shakes his hand and says, "Thank you for the wonderful America, my
wonderful
housing and food stamps!"

That person puts up his hand and says, "I am from Middle East, I am not
American!"

He finally sees a nice lady and asks, "Are you an American?"

She says, "No, I am from Africa!"

Puzzled, he asks her, "Where are all the Americans?"

The lady checks her watch and says.."Probably at work."


John H



Oh boy! We should ask your family to send you on a sensitivity course as a
suitable Christmas present this year.



I've "re-engineered" my newsgroup black hole filter, and already have a
couple of stenchmongers in it. Herring is tettering on the event
horizon. I don't have any interest in his golfing, grandchildren,
children, Disney cruises, or religion, and he has nothing to add in the
way of boating or fishing threads, so he's on his way to join D.F. Dan
and one or two others.


Gosh Harry, please don't throw me in your briar patch! I'll try to be more
like you - make up lots of stories and discuss nothing but boats!
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Larry December 23rd 07 05:27 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
John H. wrote in
:

Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--


Does this also include belittling and ridiculing atheists who choose not to
buy into superstitions?

What about children forced into their parents' religious superstitions? Do
you find that as dispicable as I do? That's child abuse.

Larry
--
I found what I wanted for Christmas at Best Buy,
but she wouldn't stop screaming obscenities while
we were scanning her and forcing her into the bag!

How was I s'posed ta know associate girls weren't
on sale?


Larry December 23rd 07 05:29 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
HK wrote in news:kqednX0A-
:

they are
doing it by trying to force their beliefs onto society as a whole.


That also goes for the boys at the Lodge......

Larry
--
I found what I wanted for Christmas at Best Buy,
but she wouldn't stop screaming obscenities while
we were scanning her and forcing her into the bag!

How was I s'posed ta know associate girls weren't
on sale?


John H. December 23rd 07 06:01 PM

Yo!! Chuck...
 
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:27:52 +0000, Larry wrote:

John H. wrote in
:

Harry, I'm not near the zealot you would have me be. I do, however, find
pretty despicable those who would ridicule or belittle the religious
beliefs of another.
--


Does this also include belittling and ridiculing atheists who choose not to
buy into superstitions?

What about children forced into their parents' religious superstitions? Do
you find that as dispicable as I do? That's child abuse.

Larry


I've not belittled or ridiculed atheists who choose to believe whatever
they believe, and I'd feel the same about anyone who did.

What you define as 'superstition', another may define as 'faith'. What you
define as 'child abuse', another may define as the instilling of values.

--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com