|
Maybe a little too religious for some...
|
Maybe a little too religious for some...
|
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote in
: There are no levels above Master Mason. Then simply explain away the consistently-recurring pyramid above them....??? Larry -- QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights. How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use! |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 21, 4:46�pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:16:44 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: Here's a Mason who disagrees with you: http://www.robertlomas.com/Freemason/Origins.html Apparently there are differences of opinion within the order. And of course, there are a variety of "rites" with varying numbers of degrees operating under the common Masonic umbrella. Ah yes - Dr. Robert Lomas. I won't get into the whole Lomas suppositions as they have been thoroughly debunked by serious historians - they even did a Discovery Channel Special on Lomas's "work". �He's considered the Eric von Daniken of Masonic conspiracy theorists - by other Masonic conspiracy theorists. He's also the one who claims that the Knights Templar treasure is located beneath the chapel. Or the lawn. Or the West Tower based on some arcane methodology crossing Knights Templar and Masonic Ritual, phases of the moon, the Aztec Columnar Table and the price of tea in Tibet. However, to get back to the Knights Templar being the progenitors of Masonic Ritual. I hate to burst your oh so not careful research on the subject, but the whole Masonic Knights thing is an inside joke - has been for a long time. Think Masons and Knights. Is trying to identify the "true Freemason" as difficult as figuring out who is a "real" American, Republican, Democrat, or Christian? �:-) Not at all. What it does prove is that folks who have little or no knowledge of the subject will theorize, extemporize and a lot of other izes combining and interpolating all kinds of obscure claptrap to prove their point. The simple truth is this - Free Masons are lodge based, governed by the same sets of rules and have nothing in common with Knights Templar or any other mysterious order of antiquity other than that invented when the Fraternity was established. �I can point you to Catholic ritual which is also very similar to the establishment of an Entered Apprentice - does that mean that Masons are descended from Benedictine Monks? Pseudo detective work with little or no meaning. If you are really interested in feeding your obvious appetite for deconstructing all things historical, here's a few to keep you busy - I can imagine you will find all finds of interesting fodder. Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulcher of Jerusalem. The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta. The Pontifical Equestrian Order of St. Gregory the Great. The Most Honorable Military Order of the Bath. And yet another Van Daniken site? http://www.knightstemplar.ca/join.htm My original statement was that some Masons regard the Knights Templar as their philosophical ancestors. In the course of our discussion, I have cited several Masons making that exact claim. Wave the rule book all you like. I don't claim to be well versed in the details of Freemasonry- but nothing trotted out as official Masonic doctrine changes the fact that I stated; some Masons do regard the Knights Templay as philosophical ancestors. And as I noted very early on, those Masons could be wrong. This could be one of those interminable cite wars, but to what point? I'm not addressing or challenging the official rules or position, merely noting that some Masons feel a certain way. The rules don't disprove that, nor do the apparently maverick masons (thousands of them) disprove your knowledge of the rules of the order. Is Freemasonry so draconian that no Mason can think or feel anything that isn't authorized in the official doctrine? Some Masons consider the Knights Templar philosophical ancestors, even if the official rules do not. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 22, 12:43*am, Larry wrote:
Tim wrote in news:e7938d8c-bfb3-4c43-a41f- : I really don't know what nor how *to consider that statement, but if anything else, I don't subscribe to seemingly every conspiracy theory that can be drempt up. So I'm sitting here humorously pondering who and/or what the real "sheeple" is... or are" Those who forget the Inquisition are bound, like history, to repeat it. What's going on in America with Christian Fundamentalism, if left unquestioned to infect the innocent young, as it does, may well be the Yeah, yeah, Larry. I sincerely doubt if you've considered that there are more people...WAY FAR more people killed by drunk drivers than by " Christian religious fundamentalists" per year? Inquisition all over again for "God's Army". I hope we can hold that off long enough for me to enjoy a few years of retirement and a natural death before the blood letting, burning at the stakes and dying for someone's god starts over again. Larry are you afraid you'd be held in the first kangaroo court and be tried for your "sins" agains psuedo christianity and be condemned to be dipped in hot oit before being light up like a fondue? Actually I think you're doing yourself and the world a far greater service by investigating that the Masonic Lodge and the Illuminati and they're ideas of world supremacy and that they'd stop at nothing to do it!!! Thise are the ones you need toworry about...... After alll they DID have JFK assinated. and rememeber on the Kennedy half dollar, they put that tiny little hammer and sickle at the base of kennedys neck just to remind you where a bullet came though, right? |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:15:31 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: Is Freemasonry so draconian that no Mason can think or feel anything that isn't authorized in the official doctrine? Some Masons consider the Knights Templar philosophical ancestors, even if the official rules do not Never mind Chuck. Believe what you will. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
WaIIy wrote in
: On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:43:24 +0000, Larry wrote: What's going on in America with Christian Fundamentalism, if left unquestioned to infect the innocent young, as it does, may well be the Inquisition all over again for "God's Army". Larry, stick to electronics and stfu about religion. You know better. I know better? What does that mean? Noone forces you to read my posts. So far, I don't think you and your cult can shut me up, either... Larry -- QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights. How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use! |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns
wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Roger Pearse wrote:
On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. Ah, yes, the Council of Nicaea never took place in 325 CE. Right. But others think it was the first ecumenical council of the Christian church, meeting in ancient Nicaea. It was called by the emperor Constantine I, an unbaptized catechumen, or neophyte, who presided over the opening session and took part in the discussions. He hoped a general council of the church would solve the problem created in the Eastern church by Arianism, a heresy first proposed by Arius of Alexandria that affirmed that Christ is not divine but a created being. Pope Sylvester I did not attend the council but was represented by legates. The council condemned Arius and, with reluctance on the part of some, incorporated the nonscriptural word homoousios (“of one substance”) into a creed (the Nicene Creed) to signify the absolute equality of the Son with the Father. The emperor then exiled Arius, an act that, while manifesting a solidarity of church and state, underscored the importance of secular patronage in ecclesiastical affairs. The council also attempted but failed to establish a uniform date for Easter. But it issued decrees on many other matters, including the proper method of consecrating bishops, a condemnation of lending money at interest by clerics, and a refusal to allow bishops, priests, and deacons to move from one church to another. Socrates Scholasticus, a 5th-century Byzantine historian, said that the council intended to make a canon enforcing celibacy of the clergy, but it failed to do so when some objected. It also confirmed the primacy of Alexandria and Jerusalem over other sees in their respective areas. Ergo, Gene was correct. So sorry. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 25, 1:14�pm, Roger Pearse wrote:
On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". �Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse While the council didn't specifically canonize the modern Bible, Constantine did order at essentially that same time 50 copies of the "approved" religious texts for use in the churches of Constantinople. Modern scholars disagree whether those approved scriptures included nearly all of the current "New Testament" or merely Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- but there is no thought that any books not included in a modern Bible were made available to the churches in Constantinople. The council at Nicea did order the burning of books representing minority viewpoints regarding whether God was of a triune nature, etc. At least one major priest was kicked out of the church for "wrong thinking". Nevertheless, as Gene said by the end of the 4th Century the Church had convened a series of committe meetings to discuss and debate which books should be included in the official Bible, and things decided then are still in effect today. In addition to Nicea,there were councils convened at Laodicea and Carthage that addressed canonization. A number of false assumptions prevailed at these councils, including the common belief that books we now know did not exist prior to 150-180 AD were "apostolic" writings, (authored by men who had traveled with Jesus). If the books were written by the original disciplies (many of whom were probably illiterate), the disciples would certainly have lived to a very ripe old age. Interesting note: Harry Potter novels and works by Stephen King notwithstanding, the Bible is the world's best selling book year after year. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 26, 9:18Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 25, 1:14�pm, Roger Pearse wrote: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". �Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? While the council didn't specifically canonize the modern Bible, Constantine did order at essentially Â*that same time 50 copies of the "approved" religious texts for use in the churches of Constantinople. It would be a curious leap to assert that when you or I buy a bible we determine its contents! Constantine did order 50 copies of the bible from the famous scriptorium at Caesarea (and doubtless from other scriptoria also) in order to supply them to his new city in Constantinople. Modern scholars disagree whether those approved scriptures included nearly all of the current "New Testament" or merely Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- References are required for this curious assertion, you know. Since fourth century codices could contain the complete NT, we may reasonably suppose that they did. The term 'New Testament' was already two centuries old by then. but there is no thought that any books not included in a modern Bible were made available to the churches in Constantinople. Well, perhaps; but not necessarily. In the manuscript era books can contain all sorts of things written on spare pages, or considered useful. It is a mistake to imagine that a manuscript of the bible necessarily contains only canonical materials. Every manuscript is unique. Some of the 4th century codices contain material from the apostolic fathers. The council atNiceadid order the burning of books representing minority viewpoints regarding whether God was of a triune nature, etc. Actually it did not. It had no power to do anything of the kind, not being a state body. Constantine issued an order that the books of Arius be burned -- Arius being Trinitarian, of course, although Arian -- but there is no evidence that they were, and Arius himself returned from exile soon after. At least one major priest was kicked out of the church for "wrong thinking". This is vague. Who? This seems to insinuate that for an organisation based on ideological principle to require its leaders to subscribe to those principles is immoral. Are you really enthusiastic for insincerity? If we must have priests, let the buggers be honest. Nevertheless, as Gene said by the end of the 4th Century the Church had convened a series of committe meetings to discuss and debate which books should be included in the official Bible, and things decided then are still in effect today. This is misleading, tho. The process of closing the canon was in no way so arbitrary, and there is no record of such "committee meetings". Please produce ancient evidence for your assertion, if you propose to disagree. In addition toNicea,there were councils convened at Laodicea and Carthage that addressed canonization. No, these councils were convened for other purposes, but lists of books are issued among the canons of the councils. This practise was mainly to ensure that fake texts were not read in church. (The composition of such fakes has been a hobby of heretics up to our own day). A number of false assumptions prevailed at these councils, including the common belief that books we now know did not exist prior to 150-180 AD were "apostolic" writings, (authored by men who had traveled with Jesus). Which books might these be, that did not exist at that absurdly late date, and what evidence can be produced for this daft idea? All the best, Roger Pearse |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 25, 9:30*pm, HK wrote:
Roger Pearse wrote: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". *Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. Ah, yes, the Council of Nicaea never took place in 325 CE. Right. contempt (Paste of irrelevant stuff about Nicaea snipped) Ergo, Gene was correct. So sorry. deep contempt Roger Pearse |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:54:38 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse
wrote: On Dec 26, 9:18*am, Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 25, 1:14?pm, Roger Pearse wrote: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". ?Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? While the council didn't specifically canonize the modern Bible, Constantine did order at essentially *that same time 50 copies of the "approved" religious texts for use in the churches of Constantinople. It would be a curious leap to assert that when you or I buy a bible we determine its contents! Constantine did order 50 copies of the bible from the famous scriptorium at Caesarea (and doubtless from other scriptoria also) in order to supply them to his new city in Constantinople. Modern scholars disagree whether those approved scriptures included nearly all of the current "New Testament" or merely Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John- References are required for this curious assertion, you know. Since fourth century codices could contain the complete NT, we may reasonably suppose that they did. The term 'New Testament' was already two centuries old by then. but there is no thought that any books not included in a modern Bible were made available to the churches in Constantinople. Well, perhaps; but not necessarily. In the manuscript era books can contain all sorts of things written on spare pages, or considered useful. It is a mistake to imagine that a manuscript of the bible necessarily contains only canonical materials. Every manuscript is unique. Some of the 4th century codices contain material from the apostolic fathers. The council atNiceadid order the burning of books representing minority viewpoints regarding whether God was of a triune nature, etc. Actually it did not. It had no power to do anything of the kind, not being a state body. Constantine issued an order that the books of Arius be burned -- Arius being Trinitarian, of course, although Arian -- but there is no evidence that they were, and Arius himself returned from exile soon after. At least one major priest was kicked out of the church for "wrong thinking". This is vague. Who? This seems to insinuate that for an organisation based on ideological principle to require its leaders to subscribe to those principles is immoral. Are you really enthusiastic for insincerity? If we must have priests, let the buggers be honest. Nevertheless, as Gene said by the end of the 4th Century the Church had convened a series of committe meetings to discuss and debate which books should be included in the official Bible, and things decided then are still in effect today. This is misleading, tho. The process of closing the canon was in no way so arbitrary, and there is no record of such "committee meetings". Please produce ancient evidence for your assertion, if you propose to disagree. In addition toNicea,there were councils convened at Laodicea and Carthage that addressed canonization. No, these councils were convened for other purposes, but lists of books are issued among the canons of the councils. This practise was mainly to ensure that fake texts were not read in church. (The composition of such fakes has been a hobby of heretics up to our own day). A number of false assumptions prevailed at these councils, including the common belief that books we now know did not exist prior to 150-180 AD were "apostolic" writings, (authored by men who had traveled with Jesus). Which books might these be, that did not exist at that absurdly late date, and what evidence can be produced for this daft idea? ~~ snerk ~~ |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
|
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 26, 6:49*pm, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". *Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it....http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/26/2007 7:49:49 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Please don't get so ruffled, Gene. So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. In all you're experience I'm sure you've seen many things that you would consider "more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense" I thought Roger's reply was quite calm myself. But intrestingly enough that you would call on Roger by saying " It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! " Yet, Gene, I've seen you silent concerning many spammers and this *em*eye* five* lunatic. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm not trying to be defensive, nor offensive, but this is just a course of my own observation. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:49:46 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it.... http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... It's strange, Gene, that you've never said anything to Chuck, that I recall, about his diatribes belittling the beliefs that many Christians may have. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Tim wrote:
On Dec 26, 6:49 pm, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it....http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/26/2007 7:49:49 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Please don't get so ruffled, Gene. So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. In all you're experience I'm sure you've seen many things that you would consider "more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense" I thought Roger's reply was quite calm myself. But intrestingly enough that you would call on Roger by saying " It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! " Yet, Gene, I've seen you silent concerning many spammers and this *em*eye* five* lunatic. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm not trying to be defensive, nor offensive, but this is just a course of my own observation. Seen many "boating related" posts from Roger Pearse? I haven't. I think Roger Dodger takes his "religious nonsense" a bit too seriously. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 06:48:37 -0500, HK wrote:
Tim wrote: On Dec 26, 6:49 pm, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it....http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/26/2007 7:49:49 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Please don't get so ruffled, Gene. So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. In all you're experience I'm sure you've seen many things that you would consider "more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense" I thought Roger's reply was quite calm myself. But intrestingly enough that you would call on Roger by saying " It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! " Yet, Gene, I've seen you silent concerning many spammers and this *em*eye* five* lunatic. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm not trying to be defensive, nor offensive, but this is just a course of my own observation. Seen many "boating related" posts from Roger Pearse? I haven't. I think Roger Dodger takes his "religious nonsense" a bit too seriously. We see few "boating related" posts from you, Harry. Most of yours are weak attempts to denigrate a person, place, or thing. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 27, 12:49*am, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". *Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat... (etc) smile If you post a load of religious lies, expect to get slapped down. But when you do, don't then come back cringing and whining about it like this. All the best, Roger Pearse |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Roger Pearse wrote:
On Dec 27, 12:49 am, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat... (etc) smile If you post a load of religious lies, expect to get slapped down. But when you do, don't then come back cringing and whining about it like this. All the best, Roger Pearse Religious lies? :} What's a religious lie, Roger? Christianity was created out of whole cloth between the third and fifth centuries, CE. Is that lie? |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Gene Kearns wrote:
Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. A classic response. Thanks, Gene. :} |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:16:59 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:31:49 -0500, John H. penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:49:46 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it.... http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... It's strange, Gene, that you've never said anything to Chuck, that I recall, about his diatribes belittling the beliefs that many Christians may have. Your response and support for this guy surprises me. Chuck has never aimed his diatribes at me like this idiot did. He merely waltzes in and calls me a liar with no cite, nothing. Chuck does post about boats. I checked Mr. Attitude, who directed his angst at me, and he has never posted about boats anywhere. Apparently his time is spent trolling the newsgroups posting religious postures. To be quite honest, I would rather there be none of the pro- or anti-religious posts. I have yet to see anyone initiate any posts to convince you or anyone else to accept a religion or become religious. I have, on the other hand, seen many anti-religion posts here. I am not about to get into an argument with you or anyone else about the historical accuracy of the Bible, or the 'studies' by those who oppose it. I am not a historian. The fact that one has not posted a boating post shouldn't have any bearing on his religious history knowledge or lack thereof. I don't 'support' either this guy *or* Chuck, or you for that matter, when it comes to religious posts. I don't believe in attacking the religious beliefs, or lack thereof, of another. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 27, 1:01*pm, HK wrote:
Roger Pearse wrote: On Dec 27, 12:49 am, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible.. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". *Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat... (etc) smile *If you post a load of religious lies, expect to get slapped down. But when you do, don't then come back cringing and whining about it like this. Religious lies? :} What's a religious lie, Roger? Why not read the context before replying? Christianity was created out of whole cloth between the third and fifth centuries, CE. Nonsense; and it is nonsense that everyone knows to be nonsense. Is that lie? Certainly is, unless you consider that me calling you a predatory paedophile with a string of convictions against children is "a valid opinion". I'd call it a lie myself, since I don't know any such thing about you and made it up for convenience on the spur of the moment. All the best, Roger Pearse |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Roger Pearse wrote:
All the best, Roger Pearse Evangelize elsewhere, Roger-Dodger. I recommend north Florida, where I lived for five years. Many of the people there will believe whatever religious nonsense you have in your bag, without question. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Gene, I must confess that it's taken me about 5 minutes to type this
minor post. I've been laughing so hard. To make details more minor, I didn't see your advice on blocking the MI5 dolt. Now I'll get back to LMAO! Gene Kearns wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:15:06 -0800 (PST), Tim penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Dec 26, 6:49?pm, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible. Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in the Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered holy and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correct one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". ?Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I found studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least two things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? All the best, Roger Pearse It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. As you have recommended this appurtenance to others, it seems fitting that you should avail yourself of the same.... since you are clearly in desperate need of it....http://tinyurl.com/yv53f6 All the best..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguidehttp://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/26/2007 7:49:49 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.http://www.avast.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Please don't get so ruffled, Gene. So, clearly you are trolling, again, with more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense. In all you're experience I'm sure you've seen many things that you would consider "more foolish, way-out-there, religious nonsense" Haven't we all? I thought Roger's reply was quite calm myself. But intrestingly enough that you would call on Roger by saying " It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat (except the ark), yet, here you are, posting in a boating newsgroup! " Yes, quite calm, indeed. He just calmly called me a liar and ran out of the room. I checked. He has never posted anything anywhere about any boat except the odd reference to the ark. Yet, never having contributed *anything* here he comes into this newsgroup to call me a liar. Yet, Gene, I've seen you silent concerning many spammers and this *em*eye* five* lunatic. This guy attacked me, not MI5. What the hell could I possibly do about this MI5 idiot? What has MI5 got to do with this, anyway? I did offer a bit of advice on how to block him.... the same way I have this idiot. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm not trying to be defensive, nor offensive, but this is just a course of my own observation. Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 071226-0, 12/26/2007 Tested on: 12/27/2007 8:31:44 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene's letter to The Queen, Dear Liz, Like your hats. And "Bohemian Rhapsody" is the best tune EVER!!! You rock!! I wonder if you could do me a favor and please shut down the website five.org.uk. It is getting really annoying and interrupting my favorite Usenet newsgroup. Like you could really sic MI5 on these clowns and - well, "terminate" their activities? Thanks in advance for helping out. ROCK AND ROLL!!! Your biggest fan, Gene PS: Were you married to Freddie Mercury or something? Because I like thought he was like gay. PPS: Could you send me a hat as a souvenir? I've got this wicked cool collection of hats and one of yours would make the collection totally outrageous. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:56:53 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:42:04 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene's letter to The Queen, Dear Liz, Like your hats. And "Bohemian Rhapsody" is the best tune EVER!!! You rock!! I wonder if you could do me a favor and please shut down the website five.org.uk. It is getting really annoying and interrupting my favorite Usenet newsgroup. Like you could really sic MI5 on these clowns and - well, "terminate" their activities? Thanks in advance for helping out. ROCK AND ROLL!!! Your biggest fan, Gene PS: Were you married to Freddie Mercury or something? Because I like thought he was like gay. PPS: Could you send me a hat as a souvenir? I've got this wicked cool collection of hats and one of yours would make the collection totally outrageous. Oh....crap. I guess I sent it to the wrong address..... could you forward it for me and cc/MI5???? I already did. Expect to see it on http://www.five.org.uk/. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:42:04 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene's letter to The Queen, Dear Liz, Like your hats. And "Bohemian Rhapsody" is the best tune EVER!!! You rock!! I wonder if you could do me a favor and please shut down the website five.org.uk. It is getting really annoying and interrupting my favorite Usenet newsgroup. Like you could really sic MI5 on these clowns and - well, "terminate" their activities? Thanks in advance for helping out. ROCK AND ROLL!!! Your biggest fan, Gene PS: Were you married to Freddie Mercury or something? Because I like thought he was like gay. PPS: Could you send me a hat as a souvenir? I've got this wicked cool collection of hats and one of yours would make the collection totally outrageous. ROTFL! That's probably the funniest thing you've posted here. Please post her response also. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Tin foil hats should be in fashion for this guy, but he needs a whole
body bag made of the stuff. John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. But Larry senses your system. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:25:10 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. But Larry senses your system. No he doesn't. He buys his tin foil for his hats from a company I control. MMMUUAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAA!!!! Embedded RFID strips - it's a wonderful thing. |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:25:10 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. :) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. But Larry senses your system. No he doesn't. He buys his tin foil for his hats from a company I control. MMMUUAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAA!!!! Embedded RFID strips - it's a wonderful thing. Tin or aluminum? -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On 2007-12-27 09:35:18 -0600, Roger Pearse said:
On Dec 27, 1:01Â*pm, HK wrote: Roger Pearse wrote: On Dec 27, 12:49 am, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:14:45 -0800 (PST), Roger Pearse penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On 21 Dec, 22:07, Gene Kearns wrote: I think Larry is trying to get you to look at the source of the Bible . Have you ever considered the testaments that *weren't* included in th e Bible? The Catholics decided, in the 4th century, what you should believe and.... by a show of hands .....decided what should be considered hol y and what should be considered anathema. If one was politically correc t one's motion(dogma) carried, if not it didn't. The true word was created! So it says in the "Da Vinci code". Â*Must be true, I suppose? Of course it's complete nonsense. I first graduated from a college affiliated with a particular Christian denomination. We were required to study religion and I foun d studying both sides of a central point in time established by the Councils ofNiceato be an amazing trip. This led me to the conclusion that anybody that feels that they are Christian should do at least tw o things: 1) Read the Bible.... ALL OF IT..... and 2) Study the history of the creation of Christianity.... Agree or disagree with what you like..... but you owe it to yourself to be an informed consumer.... So why didn't you learn about the subject before you posted such arrant tripe? It is apparent that you have never posted anything about a boat... (etc ) smile Â*If you post a load of religious lies, expect to get slapped down. But when you do, don't then come back cringing and whining about it like this. Religious lies? :} What's a religious lie, Roger? Why not read the context before replying? Christianity was created out of whole cloth between the third and fifth centuries, CE. Nonsense; and it is nonsense that everyone knows to be nonsense. Is that lie? Certainly is, unless you consider that me calling you a predatory paedophile with a string of convictions against children is "a valid opinion". I'd call it a lie myself, since I don't know any such thing about you and made it up for convenience on the spur of the moment. All the best, Roger Pearse I just want to say I am sorry you are so ****ing retarded and boring. So go **** yourself you ****ing halfwit *******, you can kiss my ****ing ass. You SUCK and are STUPID, RETARDED, DUMB AND UGLY. Up yours, you fleabrained moron. YOU SICKEN ME. You capers seem amusing for the first second until it becomes obvious that you are just SMEARING YOUR STINKING POOP AROUND. You idiot. All the best. Love Roger’s Mother |
Maybe a little too religious for some...
On Dec 28, 8:37*pm, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:25:10 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion.. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. *:) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen...... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. But Larry senses your system. No he doesn't. He buys his tin foil for his hats from a company I control. MMMUUAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAA!!!! Embedded RFID strips - it's a wonderful thing. Tin or aluminum? Tin. It's thicker guage.... |
speaking of tin foil hats..harry, this is for you....
On Dec 29, 12:02*am, Tim wrote:
On Dec 28, 8:37*pm, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:25:10 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:30:51 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:15:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:47:26 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:27:52 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:51:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:31:43 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: Sorry, my bad. I'll be more supportive of every sort of religion. I'll be more proactive in the future in trying to make people see that the MI5 poster really might be a spammer. I'll also be more tolerant of calm people that call me a liar. Might be better to take my approach - to wit: Screw tolerance - kill 'em all.... Um... Sorry - wrong thread. *:) That's ok.... I've made progress kill filling the perp, but I'm still having trouble closing down the website. I have written the queen..... http://www.five.org.uk/ Gene, whatever you do, please, please don't let Tom know about this: http://tinyurl.com/24n49j If you do, God help us all. We'll be next. You obviously have me confused with Larry. I don't need a two way TV to spy on you all - I have other means. Two way TV my ass. I was referring to this - "MI5 with the assistance of the Americans employed a hideous mindcontrol technology which directly read my mind and inflicted voices and thoughts on my mind. I obtained some evidence of this, so the sceptical reader can assure himself it is real world and not imaginary." *That's* some scary ****. Piffle. My system doesn't leave evidence. But Larry senses your system. No he doesn't. He buys his tin foil for his hats from a company I control. MMMUUAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAA!!!! Embedded RFID strips - it's a wonderful thing. Tin or aluminum? Tin. It's thicker guage....- from your favorite network, too! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeXLS...eature=related |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com