Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:04:23 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Dec 19, 4:08?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908 There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are). This global warming stuff has given birth to what I call "The Epic Battle of Cites" I quit reading them long ago, but then I'm not nearly the scientist as many here. Political influences are easily seen, misread, and denied. Perhaps it will all lead to cleaner air, a business boom, and technological innovation. That's what I see coming of it. Until the condos that are now 100 yards from the oceanfront become inundated by the sea, nobody will do too much about it. That's when my plan to coat the polar regions with finely ground reflective material dropped from C-130's comes into play. Of course somebody else will get credit for it, but that's ok. --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Science wins again! | ASA | |||
Sport Science | General | |||
( OT ) It's not rocket science. | General | |||
Science Marches On!! | ASA |