|
Non political, political post
I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news.
Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch |
Non political, political post
Eisboch wrote:
I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch I'm hoping the Repugs nominate Ayatollah Huckabee and he suffers the worst loss in modern American history. If that happens, in future elections the Repugs can tell the "evangelicals" to go f**k themselves, and that would be good for the party and good for America. Busy week; holiday parties three days in a row so far...whew! |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 7:40 am, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch I'm hoping the Repugs nominate Ayatollah Huckabee and he suffers the worst loss in modern American history. If that happens, in future elections the Repugs can tell the "evangelicals" to go f**k themselves, and that would be good for the party and good for America. Busy week; holiday parties three days in a row so far...whew! Exactly why all the Main Stream Media is supporting Huck, and they say they are not bias... They are directly working with the DNC..Of course we could have one of the no moral core crew pandering on the dem side.. |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran?? |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 8:47 am, "John" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran?? Probably better than Bush who has also always had preselected questions. when he didn't he put his foot in it....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ;) |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 8:11 am, wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry to burst your anti-Democrat bubble, but they ALL use preselected questioning. And they all have plants in the audience if they think for one second they can get away with it. |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 8:58 am, wrote:
On Dec 19, 8:11 am, wrote: On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry to burst your anti-Democrat bubble, but they ALL use preselected questioning. And they all have plants in the audience if they think for one second they can get away with it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah sure, and the Patriots cheated ;) |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:47:14 -0500, "John" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran?? Probably better than Bush who has also always had preselected questions. when he didn't he put his foot in it.... David Gregory is *actually* a Bush plant. -- John H |
Non political, political post
|
Non political, political post
"John" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran?? Probably better than Bush who has also always had preselected questions. when he didn't he put his foot in it.... So now Hillary is okay since she is same caliber as Bush.... |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 10:10 am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:58:01 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 19, 8:11 am, wrote: On Dec 19, 8:06 am, JG2U wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch Did you see Hillary on the Today Show a couple of days ago? She was unresponsive to their question about Bill's statement that "electing Obama would be rolling the dice". When pressured to answer what that meant, she came unglued! It's no wonder they protect her from the hard questions... she can't handle them. Not the person I want as my President. Obama was next, and he simply blew Hillary out of the water. He's like Bill way back when. He's got his act down... smoooth, baby. It has been a standard practice for Hillary for the last 10 years. She will not, does not answer any questions that are not preselected. She is why the whole "boycott Fox news" thing got started, it was to protect Hillary. BTW, yesterday, Hillary got caught with another plant in the audience asking her if she was a Christian.. Turns out the lady is another Clinton operative. It's just crazy, she can't face a reporter, how is she going to face the pres of Iran??- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry to burst your anti-Democrat bubble, but they ALL use preselected questioning. And they all have plants in the audience if they think for one second they can get away with it. I often wonder how much David Gregory, Helen Thomas, et al, get paid to be plants for Bush. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Two casts and no bites...;) Time to try another bait. |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 4:17�am, "Eisboch" wrote:
I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. �I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch The problem with the whole process, from beginning to end, is that the folks willing to sell out enough and do all the dirty crap required to win either the primary or the general election are *not* the sort of people who should be leading anything, except maybe the inmate's glee club at the appropriate penal institution. Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. |
Non political, political post
|
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:31:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: On Dec 19, 4:17?am, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. ?I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch The problem with the whole process, from beginning to end, is that the folks willing to sell out enough and do all the dirty crap required to win either the primary or the general election are *not* the sort of people who should be leading anything, except maybe the inmate's glee club at the appropriate penal institution. Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. The Chuck of yore re-emerges! Well said. It's astounding that only one senator was really willing to put his nuts on the line when telecom immunity was about to pass. It's the system. It takes so much money to run a campaign that they have no choice but to align themselves with powerful interests -- who will no doubt extract a price for the support. Broken system that needs to be replaced. |
Non political, political post
jps wrote: Broken system that needs to be replaced. Vote Ron Paul. At least the air will smell different. |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:31:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote: Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. And who's fault is that? Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. I would posit that we deserve what we get. |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side I keep waiting for Hillary!'s head to explode from the pressure of not be able to say what she really thinks because she knows she wouldn't be Senator of the Outhouse if she did. Seriously. She is so obviously on the edge of a total meltdown that you have to serously wonder if she's qualified to do anything. It's entertaining to watch her keep from exploding. |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:38:42 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: jps wrote: Broken system that needs to be replaced. Vote Ron Paul. At least the air will smell different. Although I appreciate his vision and candor, he's got about the same chance as Nader. The Republicans wouldn't let a real conservative anywhere near the pulpit. |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:43:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side I keep waiting for Hillary!'s head to explode from the pressure of not be able to say what she really thinks because she knows she wouldn't be Senator of the Outhouse if she did. Seriously. She is so obviously on the edge of a total meltdown that you have to serously wonder if she's qualified to do anything. It's entertaining to watch her keep from exploding. Proving she's human. Whomever isn't rattled by the stupdity that passes for reporting (save a few) must be made from a type of rubber compound that supports life. I frequently run across these beings inhabiting American corporations. |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 7:38 pm, jps wrote:
Proving she's human. Whomever isn't rattled by the stupdity that passes for reporting (save a few) must be made from a type of rubber compound that supports life. I frequently run across these beings inhabiting American corporations. If you ain't got the tools, don't play the game... although I do admit it would be somewhat entertaining to see her head explode;) Just not in the oval office... |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:43:05 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:17:16 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side I keep waiting for Hillary!'s head to explode from the pressure of not be able to say what she really thinks because she knows she wouldn't be Senator of the Outhouse if she did. Seriously. She is so obviously on the edge of a total meltdown that you have to serously wonder if she's qualified to do anything. It's entertaining to watch her keep from exploding. I think you're right, Tom. Her 'Howard Dean' moment is coming, and it'll probably happen during one of her laughing bouts (which seems to be her response to any question without a memorized answer). -- John H |
Non political, political post
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:35:14 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. I would posit that we deserve what we get. You betcha! Look in the mirror. We only have ourselves to blame. |
Non political, political post
jps wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:31:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 19, 4:17?am, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. ?I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch The problem with the whole process, from beginning to end, is that the folks willing to sell out enough and do all the dirty crap required to win either the primary or the general election are *not* the sort of people who should be leading anything, except maybe the inmate's glee club at the appropriate penal institution. Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. The Chuck of yore re-emerges! Well said. It's astounding that only one senator was really willing to put his nuts on the line when telecom immunity was about to pass. It's the system. It takes so much money to run a campaign that they have no choice but to align themselves with powerful interests -- who will no doubt extract a price for the support. Broken system that needs to be replaced. Let us return to the days when Senators were approved by the several states legislatures. This would remove the Senator(s) for life, and return the Senate back to its original state. |
Non political, political post
Tim wrote:
jps wrote: Broken system that needs to be replaced. Vote Ron Paul. At least the air will smell different. He is an isolationist. |
Non political, political post
BAR wrote:
jps wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:31:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 19, 4:17?am, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. ?I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch The problem with the whole process, from beginning to end, is that the folks willing to sell out enough and do all the dirty crap required to win either the primary or the general election are *not* the sort of people who should be leading anything, except maybe the inmate's glee club at the appropriate penal institution. Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. The Chuck of yore re-emerges! Well said. It's astounding that only one senator was really willing to put his nuts on the line when telecom immunity was about to pass. It's the system. It takes so much money to run a campaign that they have no choice but to align themselves with powerful interests -- who will no doubt extract a price for the support. Broken system that needs to be replaced. Let us return to the days when Senators were approved by the several states legislatures. This would remove the Senator(s) for life, and return the Senate back to its original state. And after that, we can reserve the vote to white men with property only. |
Non political, political post
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: jps wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:31:20 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 19, 4:17?am, "Eisboch" wrote: I am sitting here on the boat, sipping coffee and laughing at the news. Regardless of your political persuasion, you have to admit that the Democratic candidate selection process is boring and bland compared to the antics on the Republican side. Rudy's ad (response to Huckabee's) has got to be a classic. ?I don't know if he's serious or if it's a parody. LOL Eisboch The problem with the whole process, from beginning to end, is that the folks willing to sell out enough and do all the dirty crap required to win either the primary or the general election are *not* the sort of people who should be leading anything, except maybe the inmate's glee club at the appropriate penal institution. Our representative republic isn't all that much different from the parliamentary system the New England colonists rebelled against. Major difference is that our aristocrats have to steal more and much faster because they are subject to recall by the people. Other than that, once in office politicians all behave about the same. Sorry, but neither party has a shred of moral credibility anymore; and the more that each side insists its the One True Political Faith and the other side is a bunch clueless and devious idiots the farther from moral credibility each side moves. The Chuck of yore re-emerges! Well said. It's astounding that only one senator was really willing to put his nuts on the line when telecom immunity was about to pass. It's the system. It takes so much money to run a campaign that they have no choice but to align themselves with powerful interests -- who will no doubt extract a price for the support. Broken system that needs to be replaced. Let us return to the days when Senators were approved by the several states legislatures. This would remove the Senator(s) for life, and return the Senate back to its original state. And after that, we can reserve the vote to white men with property only. I was teasing my daughter about that the other day when she was showing me her 19th amendment project. |
Non political, political post
On Dec 19, 9:14*am, "Lu Powell" wrote:
So now Hillary is okay since she is same caliber as Bush....- Hide quoted text - http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/1677/hitleryvs0.jpg |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com