On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:29:40 -0500, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:00:32 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


Harry .... just thought of something that would keep you busy for a
couple of decades.

Go unionize China.

I believe China already is unionized, but the union is controlled by the
ruling communist party. Hell, even Walmart is unionized over there.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Nov30.html


The Chinese are taking advantage of our unbridled greed.

Those folks getting the advantage of cheaper goods at Wal-Mart are the
'unbridled greedy'?
--
John H

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:09:32 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Biting their noses to spite their faces.

Yup. It's a catch 22. I suppose you could impose high tariffs on
imported products but that opens up another can of worms. Meanwhile, the
Chinese factory worker is delighting in his and his country's newfound
economic success, very happy to be working for compensation and in
conditions that we consider slavery.

Eisboch

Harry .... just thought of something that would keep you busy for a couple
of decades.

Go unionize China.

Eisboch



It would be more fun to see all the multi-national corporationists and
Wall Streeters rounded up and shot.

Profound, Harry.

Multi-national corporations should be done away with. You are so
enlightening, Harry.


Coming as you do from the pseudo-employment world of the military, I
wouldn't expect that you would be able to be englightened.

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:52:52 -0500, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:50:00 -0500, HK wrote:

I know it won't happen in my lifetime, but there will be
a serious revolution in the future, not to impose communism, but to
round up and slaughter all the multi-national "corporationists," and
those who believe in returning to the middle ages of serfdom.

Since they will control the governments and virtually all of the
military power I guess that will make us "insurgents". "Rounding them
up" won't be all that easy, I guess we would have to resort to
terrorism.
"We looked at the enemy and they are us" - Pogo


Precisely.

Norway is calling you Harry.
--
John H

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:10:36 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"BillP" wrote in message
news:dMp1j.4989$dh.4416@trnddc05...

"HK" wrote in message


Amazing how almost everyone in denial about our contribution to "global
warming" spouts the same right-wing crapola. Obviously science denial is
a right-wing kind of thing.



Paul Reiter

A good pro and con review of this issue:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gre...arming_Swindle

Eisboch


We'll see how many on the left bother to look at it! Thanks.
--
John H

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:36:29 -0500, BAR wrote:

Larry wrote:
"Brad Darnell" wrote in
:

Really, what lies are in the movie Sicko. I guess you are a non
believer in global warming as well. 99% of scientist agree with Mr.
Gore, I guess you know more than them.


Nice deflection. Not one single reference to the Iraqi genocide in the
film I pointed out.

Here....print this chart out on your printer.
http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/02.htm
Its data comes from thousands of ice core samples from some of the
finest
climatologists in the world.
Now, lay the chart on a table and use a T-square so you can see as
efect
line across both panels....or you can cut the chart in two and overlay
the CO2 chart over the Temperature chart.

Referring to the graphs at the above mentioned web page.

Why was there so much C02 and such high temperatures 400,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much C02?

Why was there so much CO2 and such high temperatures 320,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much CO2 again?

Why was there so much C02 and such high temperatures 235,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much CO2 again?

Why was there so much CO2 and such high temperatures 130,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much C02 again?

Does anyone see a pattern?

You are pointing out the chart that '99% of the scientists' want to keep
hidden.
--
John H

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:32:51 -0500, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:53:45 +0000, Larry wrote:

wrote in news:1313a9be-0206-489c-9b82-
:

And for a more serious look at reality you could try the simpsons...
Does it even matter to you that movies by such ideologues as Michael
Moore and Al Gore, etc..are revered long after being proven to be pure
fiction and propoganda? Or is it ok as long as it serves it's purpose
in your mind? I mean, informed folks know that these guys movies are
pure bull****, mixed with a few cherrypicked facts, out of context
quotes, and deliberate gross exageration, yet I still have self
proclaimed "informed liberal" friends who cite these movies during
conversation.. It just amazes me. Are you like that?

You really need to VIEW, not just assume, this movie. It's a collection of
VIDEOS from Iraq. The stupid asses TAPED IT!

The guy who taped it, was beheaded! Even his capture was taped because he
left his video recorder behind RUNNING as he was kidnapped.

The rape of the 15-year-old girl and her family's murder isn't a
fantasy....a crime is a crime...in this case, a war crime.

Go watch the VIDEOS, then we'll talk...

Larry

Yes Larry, an American soldier raped a girl. Bad. Now, do we normally make
movies about one incident like that? How many movies have been made of any
of the beheadings?

This movie was made to belittle the USA, just for people like yourself,
Harry, and a few others who wish to disavow their country but don't have
the balls to get the hell out of it.


I see you are back to your dumb, snotty self, Herring. Too bad.

Sorry you didn't like my opinion of the movie, Harry. I know it's the kind
of thing you love because it denigrates this country.
--
John H

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:40:51 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:26:42 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Yes Larry, an American soldier raped a girl.

With the lowering of the standards the army has had to do, this
doesn't surprise me. That scumbag would have been raping an American
girl if he wasn't in Iraq.

You find a time when standards were the highest, and there will still have
been a serviceman involved in a rape. Quit looking for ways to put down the
country. Put down the individual committing the act.
--
John H

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:43:18 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:38:05 -0500, HK wrote:

I've one question about the fryer. What do you do with the oil afterwards?
Can it be stored in the pot, or what? I've never tried it, being happy with
smoked and rotisseried, but it sounds good.


People like you either pour it down the drain or out on the yard.

Strain it and pour it in your diesel tank or home heating oil tank.

Around here just tossing it in the trash in the plastic jug is
probably the most environmenmtal thing you can do. It will be burned
in our waste to energy plant.

I was wondering how you stored the oil for later use, and how many times it
could be used.
--
John H

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:38:05 -0500, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:24:31 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:

" JimH" ask wrote in message
...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news

snip

Now go eat some turkey and enjoy the afternoon.

Forget to mention, one roasting in the oven and one going in the fryer in
two hours.

Enjoy, whichever way you like it.

Did your house burn down yet? ;-)
I really don't think it's funny. If you watch what you're doing there isn't
any problem. I've done many foods in the fryer and never had a problem.


"JimH" or is it " JimH" feels he must put down anything he isn't able to
do for lack of resources or abilities. Pay him no heed.

I've one question about the fryer. What do you do with the oil afterwards?
Can it be stored in the pot, or what? I've never tried it, being happy with
smoked and rotisseried, but it sounds good.


People like you either pour it down the drain or out on the yard.

Harry, did my comments about the movie bother you *that* much?
--
John H

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:58:49 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Nov 24, 8:38 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:24:31 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:

" JimH" ask wrote in message
.. .

"D.Duck" wrote in message
om...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news

snip

Now go eat some turkey and enjoy the afternoon.

Forget to mention, one roasting in the oven and one going in the fryer in
two hours.

Enjoy, whichever way you like it.

Did your house burn down yet? ;-)

I really don't think it's funny. If you watch what you're doing there isn't
any problem. I've done many foods in the fryer and never had a problem.

"JimH" or is it " JimH" feels he must put down anything he isn't able to
do for lack of resources or abilities. Pay him no heed.

I've one question about the fryer. What do you do with the oil afterwards?
Can it be stored in the pot, or what? I've never tried it, being happy with
smoked and rotisseried, but it sounds good.
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You can run it through cheesecloth and store it for a couple of more
turkeys if you don't burn it to hot...Then eventually you need to have
it picked up by the local recycler.. Turkey frying is an expensive way
to eat turkey.

Thanks, that's what I was wondering. I think I'll forgo the pleasure of a
home-fried turkey. I wonder what the Popeye's "Cajun Fried" turkey for $40
is like. Anyone tried it?
--
John H