On Nov 22, 10:36 am, BAR wrote:
Larry wrote:
"Brad Darnell" wrote in
:

Really, what lies are in the movie Sicko. I guess you are a non
believer in global warming as well. 99% of scientist agree with Mr.
Gore, I guess you know more than them.

Nice deflection. Not one single reference to the Iraqi genocide in the
film I pointed out.


Here....print this chart out on your printer.
http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/02.htm
Its data comes from thousands of ice core samples from some of the
finest
climatologists in the world.
Now, lay the chart on a table and use a T-square so you can see as
efect
line across both panels....or you can cut the chart in two and overlay
the CO2 chart over the Temperature chart.

Referring to the graphs at the above mentioned web page.

Why was there so much C02 and such high temperatures 400,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much C02?

Why was there so much CO2 and such high temperatures 320,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much CO2 again?

Why was there so much C02 and such high temperatures 235,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much CO2 again?

Why was there so much CO2 and such high temperatures 130,000 years ago?
Who or what caused that much C02 again?

Does anyone see a pattern?

I can see why Al Gore and Global Taxing scientists are making this
**** up, their money train depends on it.. I mean, what else do you
see old Al doing but shaking hands and flying in private jets.. What
gets me is the folks like this guy above that are so eager to be part
of the revolution that they are willing to continue say stuff like
"99% of all scientists", or use Ozone Al's movie as a serious
reference, in spite of the fact that these are just myths and
fairytales. I asked you what you thought of people like that, you did
not answer. I actually know liberals who feel this type of distortion
in political arenas is "normal" in most parts of the world, we (the
US) just need to lighten up and be more "tolerant". What do you think
of those folks, Larry? Especially the guy above. And when Redacted if
revealed as the anti-American, out of context, cherrypicked,
distortion that it is, what will you think of those who promoted it?