wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 14, 11:52 am, "BillP" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message

...





On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:25:58 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html
|
|
|
|"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean
circulation
in
|the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
|warming"
|

And this *proves* what?

It proves at least one part of human induced GW theory is incorrect.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What part is that?


The part that says man made CO2 is causing the ice caps to melt.

On Nov 14, 6:02 pm, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Nov 14, 11:52 am, "BillP" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:25:58 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html
|
|
|
|"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean
circulation
in
|the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
|warming"
|

And this *proves* what?

It proves at least one part of human induced GW theory is incorrect.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What part is that?

The part that says man made CO2 is causing the ice caps to melt.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you'd be well advised to learn to comprehend what you've read.
Where is it in that article that says that without a doubt man made
CO2 isn't causing the ice caps to melt? What proof do they provide to
back that claim?

wrote in message
...


I think you'd be well advised to learn to comprehend what you've read.
Where is it in that article that says that without a doubt man made
CO2 isn't causing the ice caps to melt? What proof do they provide to
back that claim?

"During its strong counterclockwise phase in the 1990s, the Arctic
environment changed markedly, with the upper Arctic Ocean undergoing major
changes that persisted into this century. Many scientists viewed the changes
as evidence of an ongoing climate shift, raising concerns about the effects
of global warming on the Arctic."

I think it's safe to say that the "consensus" of these scientists that
viewed the changes in the Arctic as evidence of an ongoing climate shift
were focused on man-made CO2 as the culprit.

I wonder if the climate models will be adjusted to include this new data?