"BillP" wrote in message
news:3QF_i.13219$jH2.6882@trnddc01...

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 14, 7:25?am, "BillP" wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html

"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean circulation
in
the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
warming"

People should, indeed, read the article in its entirety and not assume
that the two lines pulled out of context by BillP represent the
general theme. The study in question is primarily limited to the
circulation patterns and salinity of sea water.

I agree, you should read the whole article but the statement still stands
on it's own.

Before this study was published the GW movement blamed CO2 warming for the
reduction in the ice cap, now NASA is stating that "most" of the changes
seen in the upper Arctic Ocean were not cause by GW.



Pulling stuff out of your ass again BillP?

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"BillP" wrote in message
news:3QF_i.13219$jH2.6882@trnddc01...

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Nov 14, 7:25?am, "BillP" wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html

"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean circulation
in
the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
warming"

People should, indeed, read the article in its entirety and not assume
that the two lines pulled out of context by BillP represent the
general theme. The study in question is primarily limited to the
circulation patterns and salinity of sea water.

I agree, you should read the whole article but the statement still stands
on it's own.

Before this study was published the GW movement blamed CO2 warming for
the reduction in the ice cap, now NASA is stating that "most" of the
changes seen in the upper Arctic Ocean were not cause by GW.



Pulling stuff out of your ass again BillP?

Do you know of anyone in the GW movement that doesn't believe that CO2 isn't
the cause of the reduction in the ice cap?

"BillP" wrote in message
news:R9G_i.13221$jH2.5318@trnddc01...


Do you know of anyone in the GW movement that doesn't believe that CO2
isn't the cause of the reduction in the ice cap?



What they don't realize is that doubling the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere
has virtually no effect on surface temperature. The first "layer" of CO2
had the most significant effect in earth's early history, raising the
temperature by about 6 degrees. Adding more CO2 now does nothing much ....
sorta like trying to insulate your house with 2 coats of paint.

Eisboch