On Nov 14, 5:59 pm, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

On Nov 14, 10:25 am, "BillP" wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html

"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean circulation
in
the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
warming"

And I suppose, in your brain, this is the decide all that there is no
global warming?

Where did I say that, rocket surgeon?

Awe, childish name calling. That certainly helps prove your point,
huh? By the way, I never, ever said anywhere that you "said" anything.
Notice the word SUPPOSE???

By the way- what is the earths temperature supposed to be?

Lower than it is now.

wrote in message
...
On Nov 14, 5:59 pm, "BillP" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

On Nov 14, 10:25 am, "BillP" wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/loo...-20071113.html

"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean
circulation
in
the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
warming"

And I suppose, in your brain, this is the decide all that there is no
global warming?

Where did I say that, rocket surgeon?

Awe, childish name calling. That certainly helps prove your point,
huh? By the way, I never, ever said anywhere that you "said" anything.
Notice the word SUPPOSE???

By the way- what is the earths temperature supposed to be?

Lower than it is now.


And why is that?
Hasn't it been much, much hotter before?