On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:45:57 -0500, Charlie penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
|
| To prove what?
|
| It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
| because nothing is going to happen.
|
|Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
|appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.
|
|Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
|Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
|his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
|incessant attacks to discredit them.
|
|Stop defending lying, Tom.

So, Charlie, why do you pick out Harry to try to rehabilitate and Tom
as a target to for your holier-than-thou pose?

You have millions of other off-newsgroup people to witness to
face-to-face, if that is your purpose.....

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------

Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:45:57 -0500, Charlie penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
|
| To prove what?
|
| It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless exercise
| because nothing is going to happen.
|
|Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
|appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.
|
|Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
|Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen to
|his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with his
|incessant attacks to discredit them.
|
|Stop defending lying, Tom.

So, Charlie, why do you pick out Harry to try to rehabilitate and Tom
as a target to for your holier-than-thou pose?

You have millions of other off-newsgroup people to witness to
face-to-face, if that is your purpose.....


"Charlie" pops in here every so often to see if he can get a "rise" out
of me. He doesn't, but he does get off when others respond to him. We
have a couple of posters like that in here. "Dan" is another.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:02:20 -0500, Charlie
wrote:

So, krause tells lies, gets called on them, gets reminded about them,
and you believe the problem lay with those who refuse to swallow his lies.

The "reminders" get tiresome after a while and serve no real purpose.
Why not give it a rest? Tell us something about your boating or lack
there of. That's really what the group is all about.

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:21:56 -0500, HK wrote:

"Charlie" pops in here every so often to see if he can get a "rise" out
of me. He doesn't, but he does get off when others respond to him. We
have a couple of posters like that in here. "Dan" is another.

And *that* gets tiresome also. When you finally get your halo on
straight come back and tell us more about Dan.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:21:56 -0500, HK wrote:

"Charlie" pops in here every so often to see if he can get a "rise" out
of me. He doesn't, but he does get off when others respond to him. We
have a couple of posters like that in here. "Dan" is another.

And *that* gets tiresome also. When you finally get your halo on
straight come back and tell us more about Dan.


I don't know anything about Dan. Never considered him worthy of knowing.
Sorry.

wrote:
On Nov 11, 3:31 pm, BAR wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:29:56 -0500, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
232 and still going strong.
Ever get to stay at Camp Lejeune 1957-1987?
http://www.starnewsonline.com/apps/p...=2007711110453...
No, I never had the pleasure of staying at Lejeune. I was at Cherry
Point and Bogue field quit a bit.

They told us that the radiation form the radar didn't focus its beam
until about 10 feet past where we were climbing up the stairs into the
ATC training hut. I was able to have two kids who turned out to be
smarter than most, they each currently have a 3.9 GPA.

Uh, yeah, sure, okay.......


Ok, the older one has a 3.85 and the younger one has a 3.71.

HK wrote:
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:45:57 -0500, Charlie penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
|
| To prove what?
| | It proves nothing, has no meaning and, frankly, it a useless
exercise
| because nothing is going to happen.
|
|Of course it has meaning. You don't care that people lie to you? You
|appear to be a nice guy but your moral compass is askew.
|
|Kruase is amoral. He's told so many lies he can't keep track anymore.
|Many of us have been here way longer than you and have had to listen
to |his spew for years. Anyone who challenges his lies are met with
his |incessant attacks to discredit them.
|
|Stop defending lying, Tom.

So, Charlie, why do you pick out Harry to try to rehabilitate and Tom
as a target to for your holier-than-thou pose?

You have millions of other off-newsgroup people to witness to
face-to-face, if that is your purpose.....


"Charlie" pops in here every so often to see if he can get a "rise" out
of me. He doesn't, but he does get off when others respond to him. We
have a couple of posters like that in here. "Dan" is another.

I'm not looking for a "rise", Krause. Just the truth. You're worse
than a simple, pathetic, liar. You have the balls to accuse others of
lying when you have ZERO knowledge of their boats.

Where's your puppy Don?

HK wrote:
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:21:56 -0500, HK wrote:

"Charlie" pops in here every so often to see if he can get a "rise"
out of me. He doesn't, but he does get off when others respond to
him. We have a couple of posters like that in here. "Dan" is another.

And *that* gets tiresome also. When you finally get your halo on
straight come back and tell us more about Dan.


I don't know anything about Dan. Never considered him worthy of knowing.
Sorry.

Not *that's* heartbreaking! "I'm not worthy". Damn.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

I was just telling you the
way I interpreted what SWS said.

We'll consider your interpretation the final authority, and history will
record it as fact.

Thanks for participating.

-- Charlie

Charlie wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

I was just telling you the way I interpreted what SWS said.

We'll consider your interpretation the final authority, and history will
record it as fact.

Thanks for participating.

-- Charlie

NP