Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default 113 gallons per hour...


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:27:20 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:02:43 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

And diesel/electric submarines are pretty damn efficient.

If the setup allows the diesel engine to run at a constant, optimum RPM,
regardless of vehicle speed (as diesels are really designed to do) there
will be a gain in efficiency.


Yes, and that's important on a train, it's likely having a
continuously variable transmission that allows the engine to run at an
efficient speed regardless of the actual load. On a boat running at a
more or less constant cruising speed, running at the right RPM is a
function of reduction gear ratios and prop pitch. Once you get those
two factors set correctly they will stay that way in most cases. The
one exception that comes to mind is slowing down for rough seas but
real men in real boats don't do that do they? :-)


So why wouldn't it work on a larger boat?



Like Wayne pointed out, usually on large diesel boats you run them at a
constant speed most of the time anyway, hopefully at an optimum RPM for prop
pitch, cruising speed and fuel efficiency.

I was thinking more of hybrid cars and trucks that run at varying speeds. A
small, biofuel diesel would run at a constant RPM, turning an alternator
that charges a battery bank.

Eisboch


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default 113 gallons per hour...

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:25:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:27:20 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:02:43 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

And diesel/electric submarines are pretty damn efficient.

If the setup allows the diesel engine to run at a constant, optimum RPM,
regardless of vehicle speed (as diesels are really designed to do) there
will be a gain in efficiency.

Yes, and that's important on a train, it's likely having a
continuously variable transmission that allows the engine to run at an
efficient speed regardless of the actual load. On a boat running at a
more or less constant cruising speed, running at the right RPM is a
function of reduction gear ratios and prop pitch. Once you get those
two factors set correctly they will stay that way in most cases. The
one exception that comes to mind is slowing down for rough seas but
real men in real boats don't do that do they? :-)


So why wouldn't it work on a larger boat?


Like Wayne pointed out, usually on large diesel boats you run them at a
constant speed most of the time anyway, hopefully at an optimum RPM for prop
pitch, cruising speed and fuel efficiency.

I was thinking more of hybrid cars and trucks that run at varying speeds. A
small, biofuel diesel would run at a constant RPM, turning an alternator
that charges a battery bank.


Yeah - It's slowly sinking in that it might not work.

I just hate giving up on the idea though. :)
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default 113 gallons per hour...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
..

I just hate giving up on the idea though. :)


I am sure you won't.


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default 113 gallons per hour...

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:29:15 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
.

I just hate giving up on the idea though. :)


I am sure you won't.


Damn straight. :)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Um...impossible gallons per hour? DSK General 6 August 11th 06 08:03 PM
Um...impossible gallons per hour? jps General 0 August 10th 06 07:33 PM
Um...impossible gallons per hour? basskisser General 1 August 10th 06 06:30 PM
Um...impossible gallons per hour? billgran General 0 August 10th 06 02:21 PM
Um...impossible gallons per hour? ACP General 0 August 10th 06 01:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017