Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake.
Maybe, but the food is good! --Mike "HK" wrote in message . .. John H. wrote: On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:35:52 -0500, HK wrote: Yep. The latest Sport Fishing magazine has a profile of a 42' Yellowfin center console with FOUR 300-hp outboards. Engines burn 113 gph at WOT (67 mph) but only (!) 41 gph at a 40 mph cruise. Well, fools and their money are soon parted, but I believe anyone who buys one of these deserves to be hit with some sort of horrific fuel wastage tax, maybe a non-tax deductible charge of, say, $20,000 just for owning such a resource waster. Boats and fuel wastage like this just puts us all deeper in the hole to the Saudi pigs. Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more should those folks pay? http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/up...RUISE-SHIP.jpg That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message . .. John H. wrote: Here is an even bigger way to get deeper into the hole. How much more should those folks pay? http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/up...RUISE-SHIP.jpg That is one ugly ship. Looks like a wedding cake. Like some other brands, it is "purpose built". Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Um...impossible gallons per hour? | General | |||
Um...impossible gallons per hour? | General | |||
Um...impossible gallons per hour? | General | |||
Um...impossible gallons per hour? | General | |||
Um...impossible gallons per hour? | General |