"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote
Without the option to charge her with murder, she could've bargained for
quite a bit less.
The jury did not have a problem with the idea of intent, by the way.

You sure you've got this story straight? Was it a plea bargain or a jury
trial? How'd he put her away if the jury "almost" went for it?


Does it matter at this point? Your logic is flawed. Considering the level of
public awareness about DWI, there is only one way you could not know that
drinking a certain amount and then driving makes you dangerous: You're
retarded, in which case you probably won't have a license to begin with.

If you're aware of the danger and you go ahead anyway, you have intent. It's
crystal clear. It saddens me that you can't see it.

You know it's dangerous to leave a baby in the bath tub unattended. If you
do it anyway and the baby drowns, there was intent.