On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:47:25 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:24:11 -0400, HK wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

JimH,
You are sounding exactly like
Why don't you go away for a while, Reggie?
We could do without your stench for a while.

As a matter of fact, Harry, the personal attacks have not started with
Reggie. He has asked you questions that may be difficult for you to answer,
but he's not 'attacked' you or Jimh. Neither have I, although Jimh would
like to imply that I have.


I have told Reggie that I want neither his advice nor his questions. I
have told him this at least 50 times.

But you don't deny my comment.

When I get advice, solicited or not, I usually simply thank the person for
taking the time. That doesn't mean I'll follow the advice.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:47:25 -0400, HK wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:24:11 -0400, HK wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:

JimH,
You are sounding exactly like
Why don't you go away for a while, Reggie?
We could do without your stench for a while.
As a matter of fact, Harry, the personal attacks have not started with
Reggie. He has asked you questions that may be difficult for you to answer,
but he's not 'attacked' you or Jimh. Neither have I, although Jimh would
like to imply that I have.

I have told Reggie that I want neither his advice nor his questions. I
have told him this at least 50 times.

But you don't deny my comment.

When I get advice, solicited or not, I usually simply thank the person for
taking the time. That doesn't mean I'll follow the advice.


I didn't address your comment because it wasn't relevant. As I stated,
quite clearly, I am not interested "advice" Reggie offers me, nor am I
interested in his questions. It has nothing to do with whether his
questions are easy, difficult or inane.

What you do with "advice" you are offered is your business.