On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in ... I asked you yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?

Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com


Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in ... I asked you yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com


Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.



We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."

On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in ... I asked you yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.


This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly: There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?

On Oct 24, 10:29?am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly: There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Doug, this is another example of why it might be a good reason to edit
your "send to" line down to include only the group(s) where a
discussion is relevant.

Nobody ever decisively won a newsgroup argument. Not once, and not
ever in the history of the format. With that in mind, a lot of folks
probably think it makes sense to use the medium for something other
than arguing.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
s.com...
On Oct 24, 10:29?am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS"
wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your
son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly:
There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That
was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids
with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than
objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Doug, this is another example of why it might be a good reason to edit
your "send to" line down to include only the group(s) where a
discussion is relevant.

Chuck, there are only two ways my messages ever end up in more than one NG.

1) Very ra A technical question that actually belongs in two newsgroups,
usually computer related.

2) I respond to a message without noticing that someone else has addressed
it to multiple groups. I don't check. I doubt many people do unless it
becomes an issue. The aforementioned discussion was NOT addressed to
multiple groups.

On Oct 24, 1:29 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly: There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Joe, this guy is a real nut job! He's not only infatuated with you,
but quite the stalker! If I were you, I'd consider giving his IP
address and NIC to your local authorities! The guy has pictures of
you! I'd be afraid the wacko would show up at your door, ala John
Lennon!

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 24, 1:29 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS"
wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your
son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly:
There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That
was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids
with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than
objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Joe, this guy is a real nut job! He's not only infatuated with you,
but quite the stalker! If I were you, I'd consider giving his IP
address and NIC to your local authorities! The guy has pictures of
you! I'd be afraid the wacko would show up at your door, ala John
Lennon!


zzzzz....

This guy prides himself in finding freely available things on the web, and
claiming he's a big time detective.

Speaking of which, here's a secret I'll share with you. Promise not to tell
anyone else, OK?

Ready?

This company sells books:
www.bn.com

Shhhhhh....

On Oct 24, 2:22 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 1:29 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS"
wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and your
son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly:
There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That
was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on kids
with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans (in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than
objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Joe, this guy is a real nut job! He's not only infatuated with you,
but quite the stalker! If I were you, I'd consider giving his IP
address and NIC to your local authorities! The guy has pictures of
you! I'd be afraid the wacko would show up at your door, ala John
Lennon!

zzzzz....

This guy prides himself in finding freely available things on the web, and
claiming he's a big time detective.

Speaking of which, here's a secret I'll share with you. Promise not to tell
anyone else, OK?

Ready?

This company sells books:www.bn.com

Shhhhhh....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just between me and you, buddy......

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 24, 2:22 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 24, 1:29 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Oct 24, 10:10?am, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 24, 8:43?am, "DANCING WITH THE LOSERS"
wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" aka Doug Kanter wrote
in
... I asked you
yesterday to list the various professions in YOUR family. No
answer yet. Why are you ashamed to tell us?
Did you tell everyone that you're a grocery store clerk, and
your
son
stays
stoned 24/7, Doug Kanter errr Joe?

I thought not!

At lest you can show them your dancing skills!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Dancing with the losers? I can't imagine a bigger loser than
some
clown who follows people around newsgroups just to plague him or
her
with attack posts.

We have quite a few of those here as "regulars."- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Not as many as there were at one time.
Other regulars seem to have made some personal adjustments and there
is a less encouraging environment for this type of stuff. People who
used to scrap very bitterly over even the tiniest issues now more
commonly comminicate in a polite manner. Everybody wins when nobody
cares who "wins".

Notice how juvenile something like an attack post really looks when
it's
an anomaly and not the primary theme of the group? Amazing, IMO.

This one was apparently a reaction to something unbelievably silly:
There
was a discussion about how toxic chemicals might affect children. That
was
followed by the mention of a pediatrician telling me about data on
kids
with
abnormal levels of something in their bodies. The response:

"And I told you your pediatrician is probably an idiot. An appeal to
authority works only if the "authority" IS an authority. Pediatricans
(in
general) are more driven by emotion and political correctness than
objective
fact."

I suspect the OP is one and the same person. Is that surprising?- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Joe, this guy is a real nut job! He's not only infatuated with you,
but quite the stalker! If I were you, I'd consider giving his IP
address and NIC to your local authorities! The guy has pictures of
you! I'd be afraid the wacko would show up at your door, ala John
Lennon!

zzzzz....

This guy prides himself in finding freely available things on the web,
and
claiming he's a big time detective.

Speaking of which, here's a secret I'll share with you. Promise not to
tell
anyone else, OK?

Ready?

This company sells books:www.bn.com

Shhhhhh....- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just between me and you, buddy......


Cool. Now that I know you understand the need for confidence, here's a
secret source for pet supplies:

www.petco.com