BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   G**gle goes political... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/87048-g%2A%2Agle-goes-political.html)

[email protected] October 12th 07 03:47 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


[email protected] October 12th 07 07:49 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:
An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


[email protected] October 12th 07 08:28 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?




[email protected] October 12th 07 08:38 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


John H. October 13th 07 02:32 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:38:20 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


He's not progressive. He's Bassy. Never was progressive. And, he hasn't
changed his writing style one iota in his absence.

JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 01:37 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Plane
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For Shirt
http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news...hirt/index.htm

Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirt
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05...f=mpstoryemail



It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb
everything they see.



[email protected] October 13th 07 03:32 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 03:38 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?



[email protected] October 13th 07 03:42 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 03:52 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.



[email protected] October 13th 07 03:55 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 10:52 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 04:14 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:52 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


Did I lie in this thread? If you think so, show me where. Copy & paste the
text into your next message.

As far as trolls, perhaps that's not your goal, but because you don't read
your original posts one extra time before pressing "send", they end up
looking like trolls because of their content sometimes.



JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 10:41 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:38:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?


You are overly sensitive to sound advice. Why is that?


John, go play in the street. Please.



[email protected] October 13th 07 11:02 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"





wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 11:11 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"





wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?



John H. October 13th 07 11:37 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:38:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?


You are overly sensitive to sound advice. Why is that?

John H. October 13th 07 11:39 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so
you are off the hook;)

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.



Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!

[email protected] October 13th 07 11:46 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL



JoeSpareBedroom October 13th 07 11:58 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
ups.com...


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you
brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL




Maybe you should read your original post again.



Eisboch[_2_] October 14th 07 12:27 AM

G**gle goes political...
 

wrote in message
ups.com...


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL



You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely ....

"Dick" Eisboch

[email protected] October 14th 07 12:40 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely ....

"Dick" Eisboch


OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it
won't happen again;)


BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy?


D.Duck October 14th 07 12:44 AM

G**gle goes political...
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely ....

"Dick" Eisboch


OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it
won't happen again;)


BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy?



Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-)



[email protected] October 14th 07 12:52 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 7:44 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely ....


"Dick" Eisboch


OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it
won't happen again;)


BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy?


Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-)


Hey, that's not your hand.... eeeeewwwwwww...gross.


D.Duck October 14th 07 01:15 AM

G**gle goes political...
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 7:44 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely ....


"Dick" Eisboch


OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it
won't happen again;)


BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy?


Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-)


Hey, that's not your hand.... eeeeewwwwwww...gross.



My bad. I apologize.



John H. October 14th 07 01:18 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.

John H. October 14th 07 01:31 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"





wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

egroups.com...

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.

Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?


Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts?
Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."?

JoeSpareBedroom October 14th 07 03:05 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"





wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

egroups.com...

On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

roups.com...

On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:

An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti
Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for
a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)

Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they
are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that
the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?

So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed
police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the
military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just
progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?

A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.

Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499

Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...

Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...

It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service,
and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand
this,
so
you are off the hook;)

I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible
that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go play in the street kid...

You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...

You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or
reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.

Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."

Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the
same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.

Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you
brave
enough to do that?


Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts?
Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."?


It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.



[email protected] October 14th 07 04:51 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 10:05 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti
Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for
a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they
are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that
the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed
police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the
military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just
progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service,
and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand
this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible
that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or
reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the
same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you
brave
enough to do that?


Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts?
Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."?


It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each
other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual
disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull****
and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel
and pucker up...


JoeSpareBedroom October 14th 07 04:58 AM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:05 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am,
wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by
G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti
Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has
for
a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they
are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think
that
the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an
opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that
any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed
police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the
military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just
progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The
reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If
there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe
not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service,
and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand
this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible
that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged
by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the
future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted
text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or
reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal
or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the
same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you
brave
enough to do that?


Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own
posts?
Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."?


It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each
other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual
disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull****
and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel
and pucker up...


I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a
6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your
turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write,
walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again,
and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your
infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for
doing what's best for its bottom line.



Short Wave Sportfishing October 14th 07 12:27 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:58:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a
6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your
turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write,
walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again,
and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your
infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for
doing what's best for its bottom line.


Um....you might want to take your own advice.

John H. October 14th 07 01:04 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:58:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:



Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each
other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual
disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull****
and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel
and pucker up...


I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a
6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your
turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write,
walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again,
and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your
infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for
doing what's best for its bottom line.


He needs to do all that stuff, like you do...correct?

Doug, reread the paragraph above yours.

I need a bag of New Jersey tomatoes. That'll give you something to work on
for a few days.

[email protected] October 14th 07 04:05 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!


[email protected] October 14th 07 04:10 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -





And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought;)





[email protected] October 14th 07 04:48 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?


Kanter Banter October 14th 07 07:52 PM

G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
John, go play in the street. Please.

Go dancing Dougie, err Joe.

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891



Kanter Banter October 14th 07 07:58 PM

G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!
 

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.

Not as cute as you dancing dougie!

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147

http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891




John H. October 14th 07 08:21 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote:

On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?


If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember
than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?

[email protected] October 15th 07 02:25 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 14, 3:21 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


groups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL


He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Why the name calling?


If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember
than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Not necessarily, but as newsgroup sheriff, and one who always wants
people to quit such practices, it seems damned ironic that you don't
practice what you preach.


[email protected] October 15th 07 02:27 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:


On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the
same thing? You should practice what you preach.


JoeSpareBedroom October 15th 07 02:30 PM

G**gle goes political...
 
wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:





On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:


On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:


wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"


wrote:
wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message


egroups.com...


On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
wrote in message


roups.com...


On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am,
wrote:


An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by
G.......
This
was
a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda
by
moveon.org
against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is
trademarked
the
owners can request it come down. Although G has anti
Walmart,
Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and
has for a
long
time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of
the
Clinton/Soros
thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";)


Why do you think that just because a corporation, or
corporations
have
a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that
they are
in
the
"long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think
that the
brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an
opinion
without
those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say
that any
website
that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to
make an
informed
decision?


So what if the business decided not to serve say an
armed police
officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy...
(oooops,
forgot,
progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the
military)
in
their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just
progressives
that
get to "take a stand"?


A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The
reason
doesn't
matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody.
If there
are
shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or
maybe not.


Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off
Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499


Southwest Boots Woman For
Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index...


Southwest Airline Make Man Change
T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h...


It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of
service, and
business ethics, I don't expect progressives to
understand this,
so
you are off the hook;)


I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely
possible that
children
might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently
damaged by
seeing
obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the
future.
Kids
absorb
everything they see.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go play in the street kid...


You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted
text -


- Show quoted text -


No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will
respond.
I don't deal with liars or trolls...


You complained about a company exercising its right to accept
or reject
certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing
illegal or
fishy
about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta
spel.


Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."


Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in
the same
post no less!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is
to
change feet;)


A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis.


Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't
you brave
enough to do that?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling
him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I
never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling
others
names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest
progressive, who would have thought;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the
same thing? You should practice what you preach.


If you have enough people who agree with you, you can get away with that
sort of thing. So, for example, he says I'm a liar. But, he has problems
backing up this accusation.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com