![]() |
|
G**gle goes political...
An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a
respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote:
An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote:
On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) |
G**gle goes political...
|
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
ups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Plane http://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirt http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news...hirt/index.htm Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirt http://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05...f=mpstoryemail It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that? |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 10:52 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
ups.com... On Oct 13, 10:52 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... Did I lie in this thread? If you think so, show me where. Copy & paste the text into your next message. As far as trolls, perhaps that's not your goal, but because you don't read your original posts one extra time before pressing "send", they end up looking like trolls because of their content sometimes. |
G**gle goes political...
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:38:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that? You are overly sensitive to sound advice. Why is that? John, go play in the street. Please. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that? |
G**gle goes political...
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:38:30 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that? You are overly sensitive to sound advice. Why is that? |
G**gle goes political...
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less! |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
ups.com... Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL Maybe you should read your original post again. |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message ups.com... Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely .... "Dick" Eisboch |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely .... "Dick" Eisboch OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it won't happen again;) BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy? |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely .... "Dick" Eisboch OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it won't happen again;) BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy? Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-) |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 7:44 pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely .... "Dick" Eisboch OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it won't happen again;) BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy? Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-) Hey, that's not your hand.... eeeeewwwwwww...gross. |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 7:44 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Oct 13, 7:27 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL You really shouldn't hand out unsolicited compliments so freely .... "Dick" Eisboch OH ****.. I am soooooo sorry. No disrespect meant by me. Seriously, it won't happen again;) BTW, before I address Joe again, by chance is anyone here named Pussy? Me, me, me, me....I've got my hand up. :-) Hey, that's not your hand.... eeeeewwwwwww...gross. My bad. I apologize. |
G**gle goes political...
|
G**gle goes political...
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that? Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts? Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."? |
G**gle goes political...
"John H." wrote in message
... On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that? Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts? Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."? It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 10:05 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that? Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts? Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."? It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull**** and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel and pucker up... |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 13, 10:05 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:11:50 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that? Weren't you the guy commenting about someone not reading their own posts? Where's the typo in, "Learn accept being wrong sometimes."? It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull**** and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel and pucker up... I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a 6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write, walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again, and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for doing what's best for its bottom line. |
G**gle goes political...
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:58:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a 6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write, walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again, and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for doing what's best for its bottom line. Um....you might want to take your own advice. |
G**gle goes political...
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:58:23 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: Funny how that works ain't it. Even though we don't all know each other, or even agree politically, we are brought together by a mutual disrespect for you...You have done this to yourself with your bull**** and psudo-intellectual attitude. So quit your cryin' get in the barrel and pucker up... I'll tell you what, Clevis: You start writing content that wouldn't get a 6th grader a failing grade, and I'll change my tune. Until that time, your turn in the barrel's going to be a rough one. All you need to do is write, walk away from the computer, get some fresh air, come back, read it again, and edit before you click send. I don't even give a damn about your infantile spelling. It's the content, like criticizing a corporation for doing what's best for its bottom line. He needs to do all that stuff, like you do...correct? Doug, reread the paragraph above yours. I need a bag of New Jersey tomatoes. That'll give you something to work on for a few days. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling him names! Precious! |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling others names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest progressive, who would have thought;) |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why the name calling? |
G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... John, go play in the street. Please. Go dancing Dougie, err Joe. http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147 http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891 |
G**gle goes political Doug Kanter dances!
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... It's cute the way you girls need to work in teams. Not as cute as you dancing dougie! http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/984147 http://www.jibjab.com/starring_you/receipt/1493891 |
G**gle goes political...
|
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 14, 3:21 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:48:13 -0000, wrote: On Oct 13, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:13 -0000, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL He's taking lessons from BoogerPicker.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why the name calling? If you're talking to me, 'BoogerPicker' is just much easier to remember than 'LoogerPicker'. Is one, in your opinion, worse than the other?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not necessarily, but as newsgroup sheriff, and one who always wants people to quit such practices, it seems damned ironic that you don't practice what you preach. |
G**gle goes political...
On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling others names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest progressive, who would have thought;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the same thing? You should practice what you preach. |
G**gle goes political...
wrote in message
ups.com... On Oct 14, 11:10 am, wrote: On Oct 14, 11:05 am, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:46 pm, wrote: On Oct 13, 6:11 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 6:39 pm, John H. wrote: On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:52:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 13, 10:38 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message egroups.com... On Oct 13, 8:37 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Oct 12, 2:49 pm, wrote: On Oct 12, 10:47 am, wrote: An ad by a Republican from Maine was taken down by G....... This was a respons to millions of dollars worth of propoganda by moveon.org against the candidate. G says that because Moveon is trademarked the owners can request it come down. Although G has anti Walmart, Blackwater, etc advertizing (paid) on it's site and has for a long time. I guess no one is safe from the long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs... Damn this "vast right wing conspiracy";) Why do you think that just because a corporation, or corporations have a stance, and has the balls to take that stance, that they are in the "long arm of the Clinton/Soros thugs"? You don't think that the brilliant minds at Google are capable of forming an opinion without those you've stated? Would you on the other hand say that any website that have a right wing agenda is equally unable to make an informed decision? So what if the business decided not to serve say an armed police officer, a black man, a muslim, a military guy... (oooops, forgot, progressives think it's ok to discriminate against the military) in their business, would that be ok too? Or is it just progressives that get to "take a stand"? A business can choose its customers, and it's legal. The reason doesn't matter, even though some reasons may **** off somebody. If there are shareholders, maybe they'll make a stink about it, or maybe not. Short Skirt Passenger Gets Kicked Off Planehttp://www.thestar.com/News/article/254499 Southwest Boots Woman For Shirthttp://money.cnn.com/2005/10/06/news/fortune500/southwest_shirt/index... Southwest Airline Make Man Change T-Shirthttp://www.cnn.com/2007/TRAVEL/10/05/airlines.dress.debate.ap/index.h... It has to do with advertizing, contracts, terms of service, and business ethics, I don't expect progressives to understand this, so you are off the hook;) I don't expect you to understand, but it's entirely possible that children might stumble into this newsgroup and be permanently damaged by seeing obscenities like "advertizing". Please fix that in the future. Kids absorb everything they see.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go play in the street kid... You are overly sensitive to facts. Why is that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, if someone credible enters with questions or info, I will respond. I don't deal with liars or trolls... You complained about a company exercising its right to accept or reject certain customers. You may not like it, but there's nothing illegal or fishy about it. Learn accept being wrong sometimes. And, lurn ta spel. Please translate: "Learn accept being wrong sometimes." Oh, I see you covered yourself by commenting on his spelling, in the same post no less!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Seems the only time this guy takes his foot out of his mouth is to change feet;) A typo is much different from an addiction, Clevis. Now, why don't you stick with the subject of the thread, or aren't you brave enough to do that?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Brave enough?? What a dick.... LOL- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This, from the person who wrongly accused and whined about me calling him names! Precious!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And of course you misrepresented my statements (anyone surprised?). I never said you called "me" names, I made reference to him calling others names, Coulter for instance. Another intellectually dishonest progressive, who would have thought;)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why do you call out people for name calling when you do exactly the same thing? You should practice what you preach. If you have enough people who agree with you, you can get away with that sort of thing. So, for example, he says I'm a liar. But, he has problems backing up this accusation. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com