Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? His wife is tired of picking up after him at the house. :} |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() HK wrote: Tim wrote: Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? His wife is tired of picking up after him at the house. :} LOL! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message news ![]() Tim wrote: Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? His wife is tired of picking up after him at the house. :} That's certainly part of it! Eisboch |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message oups.com... Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? I was referring to some opinions presented here on wrecked.boats. As to why I "have" to go back ....... it's because I can ..... and I want to. Eisboch |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 10, 8:23 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message oups.com... Eisboch wrote: Back to the boat. You know, the thing I worked my ass off to get for the last 30 years. I own it ... it's paid for, but now that I can enjoy it, some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And don't talk to me about fuel. I suspect I use far less per season than most people on this NG. (except maybe one person). Can't win. Oh yeah .... Harry ... there *used* to be a luxury tax applied to boats up here. It was found to be unconstutional and discarded years ago. Eisboch Not being the sharpest knife int he drawer on such matters I have to ask: If no "luxury tax, then what is the some people think I should pay extra just for the privilege of having it. And I thought you spent a lot of time on the boat, so why do you have to go back to it??? I was referring to some opinions presented here on wrecked.boats. As to why I "have" to go back ....... it's because I can ..... and I want to. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote:
OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots Well, that explains a lot. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote: OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots Well, that explains a lot. To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish' army boots of today. Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote: OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots Well, that explains a lot. To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish' army boots of today. Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots? I like 'em and still wear em, when I can find them in my size. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:10:08 -0000, Tim wrote:
On Oct 11, 6:20 am, John H. wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:16 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:39:51 -0700, Tim wrote: OK, sorry I'm so slow, but ... I still wear army boots Well, that explains a lot. To think of the hours I'd have saved, daily, if we'd had the 'no polish' army boots of today. Other than that, what could you possibly have against Army boots? I like 'em and still wear em, when I can find them in my size. Size 9, A narrow? ~~ snerk ~~ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I gotta get me one of these.. | General | |||
I gotta get me one of these... | General | |||
Gotta tie her up | Cruising | |||
Ya gotta love it! | ASA | |||
Gotta Fly! | ASA |