Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@4ax. com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4a x.com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your childish
messages. See your doctor.

Judging the performers...
 

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...





On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(


Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect he
regrets having done so by now. :-)

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:

I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?


it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

Judging the performers...
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:24:22 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:dafsg31kckl75okvp5vptdumbr3ni133qs@4ax. com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:r7esg3d21ae39kgia1hani1l0f427icser@4a x.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@ 4ax.com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as
possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should
answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in
a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)

Well, then there must be some other explanation for some of your childish
messages. See your doctor.


I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

Doug, yesterday you got royally dumped on by just about everyone in the
group. Shouldn't you take a day or two off?

If you take off two days, I'll take off one.

Judging the performers...
 

On Oct 11, 11:26 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

. ..

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect he
regrets having done so by now. :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I doubt it. T is a charitable kind of guy.. Even takes me fishin'.
However iirc the invite was to beat the **** out of you fishin' and
make a fool of you. But after your initial "your spot, your terms",
you started changing the conditions....

Judging the performers...
 

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:03:01 -0700, Tim wrote:

John H. wrote:
I'm getting my neck operation on the 29th of November. That OK?

it's OK with me, thats also my birthday.

Hope all goes well with you, John. and hope the surgery and recovery
is smooth.

The doctor says no golf for *four* months! Crap!


Neck operation? What did you do to yourself?

Judging the performers...
 

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:13:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax .com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.


Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.


If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities, questioned your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal attack in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should answer
your
question.


I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.


So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling, and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others in the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?


I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one, using the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"


I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your mettle in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do for you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the definition, I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".


Except in your mind, I've not imbibed alcoholic beverages for almost 20
years now. So, I'm guessing you've made up your own definition.

And, that's OK! :)