I'm just sayin' ;)
 

Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....


http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm


;)

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

wrote in message
ps.com...
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....


http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm


;)


Did somebody say "low transom"?

Never mind....
:)

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....


http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm


;)



Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
ps.com...
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....


http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm


;)


Did somebody say "low transom"?

Never mind....
:)



No, I don't think anyone talked about a LT, but if you want a photo of
one still being built, I know where you can get one.

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....

http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm

;)

Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

The trihull, but it is a bay boat. On the other hand, we were talking
about taking a wave broadside. You got to remember Harry, I am a
low transom guy too, and I ain't skeeret of a little wetfoot, but...

I'm just sayin;)

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....

http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm

;)

Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

Actually now that I think about it, maybe both would loosen your
fillings as I did "design" them both with 12 degree deadrise... In
comparison to your Parker, they are both "flat bottom" boats for all
practical purposes. I was just comparing a boat with primary stability
to one with secondary.

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

wrote:
On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??
Hummmmmm....
http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm
;)
Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

The trihull, but it is a bay boat. On the other hand, we were talking
about taking a wave broadside. You got to remember Harry, I am a
low transom guy too, and I ain't skeeret of a little wetfoot, but...

I'm just sayin;)



I don't like trihulls, and haven't liked them since I first rode in one
in the 1960s. I don't see any need for such a hullform for a sheltered
bay or inshore boat. To me, the best such boats are the flat or slight
vee boats made by Carolina Skiff, and if I move back to Florida, I'm
sure that brand would be first on my list for an ICW boat.

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:21:28 -0000,
wrote:

On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....

http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm

;)

Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

The trihull, but it is a bay boat. On the other hand, we were talking
about taking a wave broadside. You got to remember Harry, I am a
low transom guy too, and I ain't skeeret of a little wetfoot, but...

I'm just sayin;)

When you look at a hull, you also have to take into account bow entry
and how it evolves into the stern.

A properly designed bay boat hull will have a sharp bow entry which
will flare to a a flatter stern somewhere about 2/3s the way down the
length of the hull.

To say that it will "pound" because of the design is silly. All hulls
"pound" at speed depending on the sea state. My Contenders weren't
the most even landing hulls in the world and I seriously doubt the
Parker is any different than those boats were.

On any long run, you are going to use the engine trim angle to adjust
the entry point of the bow into the prevailing sea state to prevent
"pounding". The occasional wake or cross wake that sneaks up on you
will make the boat pound, but that's true for the hull of any
manufacturer.

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

On Oct 9, 4:42 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:21:28 -0000,
wrote:





On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....

http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm

;)

Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your fillings?

The trihull, but it is a bay boat. On the other hand, we were talking
about taking a wave broadside. You got to remember Harry, I am a
low transom guy too, and I ain't skeeret of a little wetfoot, but...

I'm just sayin;)

When you look at a hull, you also have to take into account bow entry
and how it evolves into the stern.

A properly designed bay boat hull will have a sharp bow entry which
will flare to a a flatter stern somewhere about 2/3s the way down the
length of the hull.

To say that it will "pound" because of the design is silly. All hulls
"pound" at speed depending on the sea state. My Contenders weren't
the most even landing hulls in the world and I seriously doubt the
Parker is any different than those boats were.

On any long run, you are going to use the engine trim angle to adjust
the entry point of the bow into the prevailing sea state to prevent
"pounding". The occasional wake or cross wake that sneaks up on you
will make the boat pound, but that's true for the hull of any
manufacturer.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The tri hull here starts sharper and flattens out about miships. The
Vee, a little further back. I'm just sayin'

I'm just sayin' ;)
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 9, 4:42 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:21:28 -0000,
wrote:





On Oct 9, 3:45 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
Which boat will dip into a wave??

Hummmmmm....

http://www.yaimkool.com/imjustsayin.htm

;)

Which one will bounce hard enough in a real chop to loosen your
fillings?

The trihull, but it is a bay boat. On the other hand, we were talking
about taking a wave broadside. You got to remember Harry, I am a
low transom guy too, and I ain't skeeret of a little wetfoot, but...

I'm just sayin;)

When you look at a hull, you also have to take into account bow entry
and how it evolves into the stern.

A properly designed bay boat hull will have a sharp bow entry which
will flare to a a flatter stern somewhere about 2/3s the way down the
length of the hull.

To say that it will "pound" because of the design is silly. All hulls
"pound" at speed depending on the sea state. My Contenders weren't
the most even landing hulls in the world and I seriously doubt the
Parker is any different than those boats were.

On any long run, you are going to use the engine trim angle to adjust
the entry point of the bow into the prevailing sea state to prevent
"pounding". The occasional wake or cross wake that sneaks up on you
will make the boat pound, but that's true for the hull of any
manufacturer.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The tri hull here starts sharper and flattens out about miships. The
Vee, a little further back. I'm just sayin'


You should build one for each of us to test out for a few years. I'm just
sayin...