Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:09 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:55 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:27 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,
The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.
As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.
The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.
So, if Columbia allows the Iranian pres to visit, why not allow the
head of the Minutemen? This seems a little (ok, a lot)
hypocritical. Columbia does not seem to value free speech so as it
values allowing anti-USA voices. I have no objection to listening to
this nutjob but INVITING him when they would not allow the Minutmen
head to speak and have not invited him back is totally at odds with
any notion of free speech. Why not invite David Duke? This is
nothing but liberal hypocrisy ( a virtue among them) at its most
obvious. They do not allow ROTC but they INVITE someone who executes
gays and stones women to death, only a liberal would think that is
reasonable.
I'm sure if the military ends its official discrimination on the basis
of sexuality, it will be welcome where it isn't welcome now.
So, The Iranian nutjob who kills gays is welcome but ROTC isnt? This
is liberal logic I s'pose, not obvious to us rednecks.
I'll take that as an admission of their hypocrisy.
Huh?

Gilchrist lost control of his pack of racist vigilantes. Is he back in
charge there? Is David Duke still a spokesman for his branch of the GOP?

Harry cannot find any way to defend the hypocrisy. In fact, following
the logic of Columbia, if the US military started executing gays (as
does Iran) ROTC would be invited to Columbia.
Columbia HAS NOT invited the Minutemen back, so much for freedom of
speech there.



I'm sorry, but I cannot find even an atom of logic in what you are
posting here regarding that group that insulted the name of a fine
organization of revolutionary war Bostonians. Have a nice day.

On Sep 24, 3:16 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:09 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:55 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:27 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,
The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.
As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.
The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.
So, if Columbia allows the Iranian pres to visit, why not allow the
head of the Minutemen? This seems a little (ok, a lot)
hypocritical. Columbia does not seem to value free speech so as it
values allowing anti-USA voices. I have no objection to listening to
this nutjob but INVITING him when they would not allow the Minutmen
head to speak and have not invited him back is totally at odds with
any notion of free speech. Why not invite David Duke? This is
nothing but liberal hypocrisy ( a virtue among them) at its most
obvious. They do not allow ROTC but they INVITE someone who executes
gays and stones women to death, only a liberal would think that is
reasonable.
I'm sure if the military ends its official discrimination on the basis
of sexuality, it will be welcome where it isn't welcome now.
So, The Iranian nutjob who kills gays is welcome but ROTC isnt? This
is liberal logic I s'pose, not obvious to us rednecks.
I'll take that as an admission of their hypocrisy.
Huh?

Gilchrist lost control of his pack of racist vigilantes. Is he back in
charge there? Is David Duke still a spokesman for his branch of the GOP?

Harry cannot find any way to defend the hypocrisy. In fact, following
the logic of Columbia, if the US military started executing gays (as
does Iran) ROTC would be invited to Columbia.
Columbia HAS NOT invited the Minutemen back, so much for freedom of
speech there.

I'm sorry, but I cannot find even an atom of logic in what you are
posting here regarding that group that insulted the name of a fine
organization of revolutionary war Bostonians. Have a nice day.

C'mon Harry, at least try to defend yourself. Columbia invites a guy
who executes gays but somehow you think Columbia will like ROTC if
they allow gays. This makes no sense.

On Sep 24, 3:24 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:16 pm, HK wrote:



Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:09 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:55 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:27 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,
The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.
As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.
The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.
So, if Columbia allows the Iranian pres to visit, why not allow the
head of the Minutemen? This seems a little (ok, a lot)
hypocritical. Columbia does not seem to value free speech so as it
values allowing anti-USA voices. I have no objection to listening to
this nutjob but INVITING him when they would not allow the Minutmen
head to speak and have not invited him back is totally at odds with
any notion of free speech. Why not invite David Duke? This is
nothing but liberal hypocrisy ( a virtue among them) at its most
obvious. They do not allow ROTC but they INVITE someone who executes
gays and stones women to death, only a liberal would think that is
reasonable.
I'm sure if the military ends its official discrimination on the basis
of sexuality, it will be welcome where it isn't welcome now.
So, The Iranian nutjob who kills gays is welcome but ROTC isnt? This
is liberal logic I s'pose, not obvious to us rednecks.
I'll take that as an admission of their hypocrisy.
Huh?

Gilchrist lost control of his pack of racist vigilantes. Is he back in
charge there? Is David Duke still a spokesman for his branch of the GOP?

Harry cannot find any way to defend the hypocrisy. In fact, following
the logic of Columbia, if the US military started executing gays (as
does Iran) ROTC would be invited to Columbia.
Columbia HAS NOT invited the Minutemen back, so much for freedom of
speech there.

I'm sorry, but I cannot find even an atom of logic in what you are
posting here regarding that group that insulted the name of a fine
organization of revolutionary war Bostonians. Have a nice day.

C'mon Harry, at least try to defend yourself. Columbia invites a guy
who executes gays but somehow you think Columbia will like ROTC if
they allow gays. This makes no sense.

I'll let it go Harry, I know I gotcha. Us N. FL rednecks are not too
stupid.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
ups.com...


C'mon Harry, at least try to defend yourself. Columbia invites a guy
who executes gays but somehow you think Columbia will like ROTC if
they allow gays. This makes no sense.

I'll let it go Harry, I know I gotcha. Us N. FL rednecks are not too
stupid.


To his credit and contrary to much of the media predictions, the president
of Columbia didn't lob softball questions or otherwise go easy on the nut
from Iran. Surprised a lot of people.

Eisboch

wrote in news:1190656758.707442.17350@
50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:

They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,



Humans are the worst animals on the planet:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ybZ1YLYfYVI

Religion is the worst form of child abuse. Those kids in the video have
been brainwashed by their religion from birth to throw those stones.
Professor Richard Dawkins is dead-on right in this respect. America is
no different. There are brainwashing schools across the country doing
the same thing to keep the religious bureaucracy's money rolling
in....perpetually.

Over 5000 humans are murdered every day by one religion or another "in
the name of God". Humans are the only self-destructive creatures on the
planet and are doing a very good job at it.

Larry
--
What ****es me off is the warning not to let young people watch these
atrocities. Why? They watch atrocities all across cable TV and are
taught religious atrocities at their schools. What's the difference?
They play video games that are 90% committing atrocities....murders,
maiming, etc.

They don't want the young to watch because they have not completed their
religious indoctrination, yet, and they might turn away while they can
still think for themselves and stop it.

I want to show this video, in its entirety, across every cable and
broadcast TV channel in the country...Tonight at 8PM, without warning,
especially at Columbia U....

Bosnia-Serbs, Al Arish 1000 Egyptian POWs dug their own graves then were
machine gunned into them by Zionists in '67, Abu Grahb Americans, it's
all the same.....genocide....the Killing Fields.

http://www.liveleak.com/?ogr=1
Here, take a little time at LiveLeak and watch with your kids something
besides the Zionist Illuminati propaganda on the cable.......
Don't watch during dinner....gruesome.

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:27:57 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,



The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.

Wrong.

As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.

Wrong.

The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.

Wrong.
Three strikes. Yer out!

--
Vic

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:27:57 -0400, HK wrote:

wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,



The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.

As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.

The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.

I thought the twenty minute lecture (sermon) given to the students was
quite funny. It was very interesting to learn that there are absolutely
*no* homosexuals in Iran. Mr. A picked up some heavy 'boos' with that
statement. Obviously there's no sexual preference discrimination in Iran!

Frogwatch wrote:


C'mon Harry, at least try to defend yourself. Columbia invites a guy
who executes gays but somehow you think Columbia will like ROTC if
they allow gays. This makes no sense.


There are lots of things in this world that make no sense. Example: why
hasn't Dick Cheney been indicted?

On Sep 24, 12:24?pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:16 pm, HK wrote:





Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:09 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:55 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Sep 24, 2:27 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
They won't let ROTC on campus because they feel the militarys don't
ask don't tell policy is discriminatory. Yet they let the coward bitch
of Iran talk while his regime simply jails and kills gays. But watch
the so called tolerant liberals defend this guy and Colombia to the
world. Remember this is the same school that allowed LaRaza to speak
for 1 1/2 hours then ran the Minute men off the stage with no voice,
no tolerance,
The president of the university just spent 20 minutes cutting the
president of iran a new rectal opening. He used a chainsaw. I doubt the
little dictator ever heard anything like it before.
As for the ROTC denial, all the military has to do is get over its
idiotic sexual preference discrimination.
The so-called "Minutemen" movement has been exposed for what it is, a
pack of mostly white, racist, vigilantes.
So, if Columbia allows the Iranian pres to visit, why not allow the
head of the Minutemen? This seems a little (ok, a lot)
hypocritical. Columbia does not seem to value free speech so as it
values allowing anti-USA voices. I have no objection to listening to
this nutjob but INVITING him when they would not allow the Minutmen
head to speak and have not invited him back is totally at odds with
any notion of free speech. Why not invite David Duke? This is
nothing but liberal hypocrisy ( a virtue among them) at its most
obvious. They do not allow ROTC but they INVITE someone who executes
gays and stones women to death, only a liberal would think that is
reasonable.
I'm sure if the military ends its official discrimination on the basis
of sexuality, it will be welcome where it isn't welcome now.
So, The Iranian nutjob who kills gays is welcome but ROTC isnt? This
is liberal logic I s'pose, not obvious to us rednecks.
I'll take that as an admission of their hypocrisy.
Huh?

Gilchrist lost control of his pack of racist vigilantes. Is he back in
charge there? Is David Duke still a spokesman for his branch of the GOP?

Harry cannot find any way to defend the hypocrisy. In fact, following
the logic of Columbia, if the US military started executing gays (as
does Iran) ROTC would be invited to Columbia.
Columbia HAS NOT invited the Minutemen back, so much for freedom of
speech there.

I'm sorry, but I cannot find even an atom of logic in what you are
posting here regarding that group that insulted the name of a fine
organization of revolutionary war Bostonians. Have a nice day.

C'mon Harry, at least try to defend yourself. Columbia invites a guy
who executes gays but somehow you think Columbia will like ROTC if
they allow gays. This makes no sense.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wrong newsgroup. I'd offer the same comment to left wing posters who
put something equivalent here, (and have, lately), so you guys on the
right are entitled to equal treatment. If I might be allowed to
suggest- we should try to avoid getting back to the bad old days when
this group was 60% politics, 20% personal feud, and 20% boats. The way
to do that is to exercise some self control- put your political
opinions in the proper forums and talk about boats here.

The President of Iran is not a nice guy, and it's likely that a
majority of folks from all portions of the spectrun would agree. But
the rant should go where it's appropriate unless it has something to
do with boating. IMO.

Chuck Gould wrote:


Wrong newsgroup. I'd offer the same comment to left wing posters who
put something equivalent here, (and have, lately), so you guys on the
right are entitled to equal treatment. If I might be allowed to
suggest- we should try to avoid getting back to the bad old days when
this group was 60% politics, 20% personal feud, and 20% boats. T


Yeah, now it is 5% boats, 20% advertorial, 10% politics, and 65%
personal insults.