Remember, people live in anything down there, I have lived in Bama'
some of the dwellings I saw would not be acceptable as sheds here in
the NE.. This is probably more local than we know. These boats must be
the ones stirring up problems, cigarette boats,the problems are
obvious, with the houseboats, you could be having an influx of
permanant residences being estalished on the lakes, the locals could
be trying to slow this down...

It's obvious that you haven't seen the homes around these lakes in recent
times. There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes. Far from
it.

"William Bruce" wrote
There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes.

Which is probably why they don't want floating sheds roaming around in their
back yards. I suspect justafrekin is on the right track, that somebody
wanted to address some specific problems but ended up with this poorly
crafted solution.

"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
et...
"William Bruce" wrote
There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes.

Which is probably why they don't want floating sheds roaming around in
their back yards. I suspect justafrekin is on the right track, that
somebody wanted to address some specific problems but ended up with this
poorly crafted solution.

Yeah. How about a speed limit that makes cig boats useless to own?

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:13:20 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:

"William Bruce" wrote
There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes.

Which is probably why they don't want floating sheds roaming around in their
back yards. I suspect justafrekin is on the right track, that somebody
wanted to address some specific problems but ended up with this poorly
crafted solution.


If you read the original post it appears that then law was passed in
order to get some developer to build a bunch of condos on the lake.
Now why would you grossly over pay for one of their condos if you
could grossly over pay for a houseboat instead? ;-)

Those with condos on the lake are less likely to want a houseboat on
the lake and if they don't want one they don't want anyone else to
have one.

Dave Hall

On Sep 24, 8:42 am, Dave Hall wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:13:20 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"

wrote:
"William Bruce" wrote
There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes.

Which is probably why they don't want floating sheds roaming around in their
back yards. I suspect justafrekin is on the right track, that somebody
wanted to address some specific problems but ended up with this poorly
crafted solution.

If you read the original post it appears that then law was passed in
order to get some developer to build a bunch of condos on the lake.
Now why would you grossly over pay for one of their condos if you
could grossly over pay for a houseboat instead? ;-)

Those with condos on the lake are less likely to want a houseboat on
the lake and if they don't want one they don't want anyone else to
have one.

Dave Hall

"and if they don't want one they don't want anyone else to
have one"


Ding, ding, ding... and we have a winner folks!

On Sep 24, 8:13 am, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:
"William Bruce" wrote

There are no "sheds" on the shores of any of these lakes.

Which is probably why they don't want floating sheds roaming around in their
back yards. I suspect justafrekin is on the right track, that somebody
wanted to address some specific problems but ended up with this poorly
crafted solution.

Exactly!