Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
They are also using the 4-TEC engine in some boats this year in addition to offering the Mercury engines. Dave Larry W4CSC wrote: For the record, to save the jetboat side of SeaDooDoo's business, they're using the MUCH more reliable and MUCH less gashog Mercury Sport Jets, now. Unfortunately, noone at DooDoo was smart enough to use the ONE HANDLED THROTTLE/SHIFTER and they just COULDN'T bring themselves to let Mercury's self-draining exhaust system, that requires no winterization, be. In it's place they have a PWC waterbox to keep the dealers happy winterizing jetboats. On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:39:47 -0500, "Greg O" wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... Looks like SeaDoo is toast, doesn't it? Maybe they can get rid of those queer, crappy, Austrian 2-strokers with the rotating valve nonsense this way...... Why would you think that?? The original owners of the company are back . They built the first Seadoo in the late '60's. Why would they stop now?? As far as the engines, they have used Rotax engines since the beginning, again, why stop now?? Greg Larry W4CSC Isn't it becoming more practical by the day to make Iraq's desert the new World Nuclear Waste Disposal Site? -- David B. Thomas Jr Blew-By-You PWC Services 93-A Pine Burr Rd Lumberton, MS 39455 (601) 796-2033 http://www.blewbyyou.com or http://www.blewbyyou.net |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The comment makes sense if you are a repair shop as the majority of our
business is rebuilding Seadoo engines. Dave -- David B. Thomas Jr Blew-By-You PWC Services 93-A Pine Burr Rd Lumberton, MS 39455 (601) 796-2033 http://www.blewbyyou.com or http://www.blewbyyou.net Doug Meredith wrote: "Carolina Watercraft Works, Inc." wrote in message news ![]() "These engines are bulletproof," ROFLMAO this comment makes no sense |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David B. Thomas Jr." wrote in message ... The comment makes sense if you are a repair shop as the majority of our business is rebuilding Seadoo engines. Dave Gee, Sea Doo sells what, about 55% of all the PWC's? I guess the most rebuilds you would get would be theirs. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah yeah yeah...the Poo Rep tried that argument as well...BUT...in
my area, until the past couple of years, Poos were sold at about 3:1 odds for Kawasaki, Yamaha and Polaris (not combined). I repair about 15 Poos for each one Kawasaki or Yamaha or Polaris I repair. The numbers don't lie. Sea Doo: Job security for the service industry. BTW...didn't we already go through this a couple of months back? -- Laszlo Almasi Carolina Watercraft Works, Inc. 2810-5D Yonkers Road Raleigh, NC 27604 "Doug Meredith" wrote in message ... "David B. Thomas Jr." wrote in message ... The comment makes sense if you are a repair shop as the majority of our business is rebuilding Seadoo engines. Dave Gee, Sea Doo sells what, about 55% of all the PWC's? I guess the most rebuilds you would get would be theirs. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
The R.A.V.E. valve is on the exhaust side of the Rotax engines, the rotary valve is on the intake side. Many of the Rotax mills are of a reed valve design(still in conjunction with the RAVE), now, as are all of the Suzukis(Arctic Cats), Yamahas, and Fujis(Polaris). I personally have had very good experience with the rotary valved Rotax... good power and great reliability. Seeing also that about 30 years ago, Bombardier bought all remaining shares of Rotax they did not yet own, I doubt they will install any different power in their vehicles. Rob * * * "Doug Meredith" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... Bulletproof? Right. Unfamiliar with Rotax marine engines.... I told a friend that they seemed to make a pretty good engine for the Experimental Aircraft market. He bought the boat and within a year both engines were toast because the engineers designed the carburetors to be (carbs?) cooled with raw water. Let's see.... zinc bearing metal and sea water.... whatta we got here? Nope. He doesn't use the term "bulletproof" to describe them. I've had 6 Ski-Doo's all of course with the Rotax engine zero problem. As far as RAVE goes, it must not be any good. Thats why the other builders have copied it. Sea-Doo had a problem with one of their 900 cc class engines in their PWC's. Since fixed. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bad mouthing Austrians could get you 'terminated'.
Curtis CCR wrote in message m... (Larry W4CSC) wrote in message ... Looks like SeaDoo is toast, doesn't it? Maybe they can get rid of those queer, crappy, Austrian 2-strokers with the rotating valve nonsense this way...... What? Hey, Larry, everyone loves Austrians! Crappy, queer, stroking or otherwise. Hell, we're trying to put one in the Governor's office out here! :-) |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like SeaDoo is toast, doesn't it?
Maybe they can get rid of those queer, crappy, Austrian 2-strokers with the rotating valve nonsense Gould 0738 wrote: According to the three page PDF file I received on this issue, Sea Doo will continue. (If I knew how to copy and paste PDF I'd share it with the group) Icon called "Text Select Tool" looks like large capital letter "T" with a dotted-line square. Or, press the "V" key on the keyboard. When the mouse pointer changes from a hand to an I-beam, you have the text cursor and can swipe, CTRL+C, or right-click and click 'copy.' Feel free to repost the text, as some who can read this cannot read the binaries. (hint, hint) -- frosty |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that you got my posts confused with some others, as you just
agreed with what I said. "Trainfan1" wrote in message ... Doug, The R.A.V.E. valve is on the exhaust side of the Rotax engines, the rotary valve is on the intake side. Many of the Rotax mills are of a reed valve design(still in conjunction with the RAVE), now, as are all of the Suzukis(Arctic Cats), Yamahas, and Fujis(Polaris). I personally have had very good experience with the rotary valved Rotax... good power and great reliability. Seeing also that about 30 years ago, Bombardier bought all remaining shares of Rotax they did not yet own, I doubt they will install any different power in their vehicles. Rob * * * "Doug Meredith" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... Bulletproof? Right. Unfamiliar with Rotax marine engines.... I told a friend that they seemed to make a pretty good engine for the Experimental Aircraft market. He bought the boat and within a year both engines were toast because the engineers designed the carburetors to be (carbs?) cooled with raw water. Let's see.... zinc bearing metal and sea water.... whatta we got here? Nope. He doesn't use the term "bulletproof" to describe them. I've had 6 Ski-Doo's all of course with the Rotax engine zero problem. As far as RAVE goes, it must not be any good. Thats why the other builders have copied it. Sea-Doo had a problem with one of their 900 cc class engines in their PWC's. Since fixed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|