![]() |
|
Be careful out there
I don't know if this article has been posted here yet but it's pretty
amazing. This guy tried to sail across a channel between a submarine and a warship and didn't make it. The picture is pretty incredible. http://www.thelognewspaper.com/news/...ew.asp?c=69150 Steve |
Be careful out there
"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... I don't know if this article has been posted here yet but it's pretty amazing. This guy tried to sail across a channel between a submarine and a warship and didn't make it. The picture is pretty incredible. http://www.thelognewspaper.com/news/...ew.asp?c=69150 Steve Locally, we get a lot of sailboarders going back and forth by the Golden Gate Bridge. Very fast boards. One of the local guys test driving a boat was hit by one. They say him at the last moment as he jumped from the board and hit the side of the sportfisherman about 1/3 the way from the back. This guy was the overtaking boat, so was his fault. Lucky for him, he was seen and heard at the last second and they pulled back the throttles turning 23" props. Bill |
Be careful out there
With the new rules since 9/11, this guy is lucky they didn't take him out
first with point defense guns. It's even possible that the crew/commander might even get some flak from their superiors over this. It's an even crazier world we live in now. Answer me this: How does a vessel maintain 100 yards from a militaty vessel when passing in a channel that is less than 50 yards wide? The "rules" don't seem to give a remedy for this kind of scenario. It should at least be mentioned as an exception. "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... I don't know if this article has been posted here yet but it's pretty amazing. This guy tried to sail across a channel between a submarine and a warship and didn't make it. The picture is pretty incredible. http://www.thelognewspaper.com/news/...ew.asp?c=69150 Steve |
Be careful out there
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:30:57 GMT, "J. Slater" wrote:
Answer me this: How does a vessel maintain 100 yards from a militaty vessel when passing in a channel that is less than 50 yards wide? The "rules" don't seem to give a remedy for this kind of scenario. It should at least be mentioned as an exception. It's happened to me a couple of times in Boston harbor. Not military ships, but a cruise ship and LNG tanker both had security zones around them. Since there is no warning on the VHF, it is easy to get caught by a ship leaving one of the channels or the Mystic river because they are not visible until they are entering the main channel. In both cases, the police instructed (via bullhorn) me to keep as far to the outside of the channel as possible. Fortunately this has never happened when I was near the airport security zone, one could easily find oneself caught in the middle of two overlapping security zones. -- Chuck Cox SynchroSystems Motorsport Computers Hopped/Up Racing Team http://www.synchro.com |
Be careful out there
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:30:57 GMT, "J. Slater"
wrote: Answer me this: How does a vessel maintain 100 yards from a militaty vessel when passing in a channel that is less than 50 yards wide? The "rules" don't seem to give a remedy for this kind of scenario. It should at least be mentioned as an exception. Either you don't pass, or if you do want to pass, go out of the channel. I'd guess that most of the boats people here own aren't restricted to that channel. Steve |
Be careful out there
I find it hard to believe there are no warnings on VHF
Charles Cox wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:30:57 GMT, "J. Slater" wrote: Answer me this: How does a vessel maintain 100 yards from a militaty vessel when passing in a channel that is less than 50 yards wide? The "rules" don't seem to give a remedy for this kind of scenario. It should at least be mentioned as an exception. It's happened to me a couple of times in Boston harbor. Not military ships, but a cruise ship and LNG tanker both had security zones around them. Since there is no warning on the VHF, it is easy to get caught by a ship leaving one of the channels or the Mystic river because they are not visible until they are entering the main channel. In both cases, the police instructed (via bullhorn) me to keep as far to the outside of the channel as possible. Fortunately this has never happened when I was near the airport security zone, one could easily find oneself caught in the middle of two overlapping security zones. -- Chuck Cox SynchroSystems Motorsport Computers Hopped/Up Racing Team http://www.synchro.com |
Be careful out there
"Charles Cox" wrote in message It's happened to me a couple of times in Boston harbor. Not military ships, but a cruise ship and LNG tanker both had security zones around them. Since there is no warning on the VHF, I can't address the cruise ships, but when those LNG tankers are moving in Boston Harbor everybody in the world is notified. Twice. For days in advance, and while moving. Those LNGs don't sneak up on anyone. JG |
Be careful out there
I thought that too when I passed a Navy ship in the Calcashieu river in May.
Several folks mentioned that they will not broadcast ship movements, etc. on radio. The little gunboats came up and yelled directions at me. Guess they try to stay off the radio for security reasons. -- Keith __ Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. "otnmbrd" wrote in message k.net... I find it hard to believe there are no warnings on VHF Charles Cox wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:30:57 GMT, "J. Slater" wrote: Answer me this: How does a vessel maintain 100 yards from a militaty vessel when passing in a channel that is less than 50 yards wide? The "rules" don't seem to give a remedy for this kind of scenario. It should at least be mentioned as an exception. It's happened to me a couple of times in Boston harbor. Not military ships, but a cruise ship and LNG tanker both had security zones around them. Since there is no warning on the VHF, it is easy to get caught by a ship leaving one of the channels or the Mystic river because they are not visible until they are entering the main channel. In both cases, the police instructed (via bullhorn) me to keep as far to the outside of the channel as possible. Fortunately this has never happened when I was near the airport security zone, one could easily find oneself caught in the middle of two overlapping security zones. -- Chuck Cox SynchroSystems Motorsport Computers Hopped/Up Racing Team http://www.synchro.com |
Be careful out there
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:16:39 GMT, "John Gaquin" wrote:
"Charles Cox" wrote in message It's happened to me a couple of times in Boston harbor. Not military ships, but a cruise ship and LNG tanker both had security zones around them. Since there is no warning on the VHF, I can't address the cruise ships, but when those LNG tankers are moving in Boston Harbor everybody in the world is notified. Twice. For days in advance, and while moving. Those LNGs don't sneak up on anyone. Not any more. They used to announce it in advance but for security it is kept secret now. Our sailing club used to let us know if it was scheduled to move, but not any more. I monitor 16 whenever I'm out and there are no announcements. All communication in regard to security is done via bullhorn. -- Chuck Cox SynchroSystems Motorsport Computers Hopped/Up Racing Team http://www.synchro.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com