![]() |
Spawn of Yo Ho
wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 9, 11:23 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400, HK wrote: Well, then, I suggest you don't buy one. Does it have full flotation? There was an incident on Long Island Sound within the last year or two where a boat with a similar transom got caught stern-to to a breaking wave. It glubbed in less than a minute due to lack of flotation. It has to float or they would not conform to USCG regs and I can not see a manufacturer that big getting away with it any other way. However, this particular boat being over 20 feet, it does not need to float level. Personally, I would be surprised if in a configuration such as this, they did not design it to float level anyway. Over 21' does not require flotation. My 21' boat is foamed under the floor, but the builder does not foam the new ones. He stated, that with an inboard engine, the only part of the boat above water will be the nose. So saves the weight of foam and the mess if you need to get under the floor. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400, HK wrote: Well, then, I suggest you don't buy one. Does it have full flotation? There was an incident on Long Island Sound within the last year or two where a boat with a similar transom got caught stern-to to a breaking wave. It glubbed in less than a minute due to lack of flotation. What? A boat *sank* because of wave action? This must have been the first time ever, right? Gee, what else causes boats to sink? Do you have a list? |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 21:22:37 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Aug 9, 11:23 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400, HK wrote: Well, then, I suggest you don't buy one. Does it have full flotation? There was an incident on Long Island Sound within the last year or two where a boat with a similar transom got caught stern-to to a breaking wave. It glubbed in less than a minute due to lack of flotation. It has to float or they would not conform to USCG regs and I can not see a manufacturer that big getting away with it any other way. However, this particular boat being over 20 feet, it does not need to float level. Personally, I would be surprised if in a configuration such as this, they did not design it to float level anyway. Over 21' does not require flotation. My 21' boat is foamed under the floor, but the builder does not foam the new ones. He stated, that with an inboard engine, the only part of the boat above water will be the nose. So saves the weight of foam and the mess if you need to get under the floor. What year was your boat made? |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400, HK wrote: Well, then, I suggest you don't buy one. Does it have full flotation? There was an incident on Long Island Sound within the last year or two where a boat with a similar transom got caught stern-to to a breaking wave. It glubbed in less than a minute due to lack of flotation. All Parkers are foam-filled under the deck. As they are linerless boats, there's no foam in the hullsides. But there's enough foam injected to keep the boat afloat. Does your Grand Banks have full floatation? I mean, if you strike a log or a reef and put a nice-sized hole in that hull, is there enough flotation in the boat so that it stays afloat? How about if you broach and take a few tons of water over the side, or if you suffer a knockdown? Got enough flotation built into that boat to keep it floating level and safe until help arrives? |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 12:22 am, "Calif Bill" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 9, 11:23 pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:24:11 -0400, HK wrote: Well, then, I suggest you don't buy one. Does it have full flotation? There was an incident on Long Island Sound within the last year or two where a boat with a similar transom got caught stern-to to a breaking wave. It glubbed in less than a minute due to lack of flotation. It has to float or they would not conform to USCG regs and I can not see a manufacturer that big getting away with it any other way. However, this particular boat being over 20 feet, it does not need to float level. Personally, I would be surprised if in a configuration such as this, they did not design it to float level anyway. Over 21' does not require flotation. My 21' boat is foamed under the floor, but the builder does not foam the new ones. He stated, that with an inboard engine, the only part of the boat above water will be the nose. So saves the weight of foam and the mess if you need to get under the floor.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Floating with the nose up, is floating according to the CG. Anyway, under 20 feet it has to float level, over 20 not. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote:
All Parkers are foam-filled under the deck. As they are linerless boats, there's no foam in the hullsides. But there's enough foam injected to keep the boat afloat. Under 20 feet, the Coast Guard requires that they must be rated for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower capacity limits. They are also required to have built-in flotation. Boats over 20 feet long are not subject to standards for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower and have no flotation requirements. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 8:16 am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote: All Parkers are foam-filled under the deck. As they are linerless boats, there's no foam in the hullsides. But there's enough foam injected to keep the boat afloat. Under 20 feet, the Coast Guard requires that they must be rated for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower capacity limits. They are also required to have built-in flotation. Boats over 20 feet long are not subject to standards for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower and have no flotation requirements. Buying a boat withougt flotation, is like buying an aeroplane with no wings. Commercial vessel maybe, but a passenger vessel with no flotation, if you sink, you deserve it. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote: All Parkers are foam-filled under the deck. As they are linerless boats, there's no foam in the hullsides. But there's enough foam injected to keep the boat afloat. Under 20 feet, the Coast Guard requires that they must be rated for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower capacity limits. They are also required to have built-in flotation. Boats over 20 feet long are not subject to standards for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower and have no flotation requirements. So? |
Spawn of Yo Ho
|
Spawn of Yo Ho
|
Spawn of Yo Ho
|
Spawn of Yo Ho
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:39:39 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:39:40 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:36:54 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Side view: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...-08-080001.jpg !! You didn't go for the aluminum trailer ?? Of course I did. But I won't be able to pick it up in Norfolk until Saturday or Monday. The trailer you see is one of the dealer's yard trailers. When new boats come in, they have to be stashed on something. Tri-State uses cradles or trailers to prop up its new boats. Are you getting yours from S&S? I drove to Norfolk to pick up mine.... Yup. Wanna meet me for lunch end of next week? I'm supposed to pick it up either Saturday the 18th or Monday. Maybe we could pick up a charter in Virginia Beach. I believe I'll be kinda footloose the end of next week with my wife visiting her maternal grandma in western North Carolina. That would be Saturday the 18th or the following Monday. Where will you be? Will you be cruising west toward granny? Monday is the first day of classes.... no way I'll get out of that.... Yikes. I guess I worded that...poorly. No, I will not be cruising west towards granny. My wife's annual trips to granny's house are a henfest, with the convergence of a number of female relatives. Granny, by the way, is 100 years old this year. She's a very healthy, active lady. On Saturday, the 18th, hopefully, I will be cruising down to Norfolk to pick up the trailer. But I won't know until Friday the 17th. That's when the trailer is supposed to arrive there. If it isn't there for pickup on the 18th, I'll be driving down on Monday the 20th. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
It's not an illusion, this boat is extremely wet in anything but light chop. I was in one with one other person and we continually had waves breaking over the transom while drift fishing in 2' waves. Look at Harry's own pic- you can see how large and deep the cutout is. Looks like ole' Harry has bought a pig. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 8:29 am, HK wrote:
Teak floats. Eisboch Indeed.- - Not according to the CG;) |
Spawn of Yo Ho
wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 10, 8:29 am, HK wrote: Teak floats. Eisboch Indeed.- - Not according to the CG;) Relax. It was a joke. Eisboch |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:22:24 -0400, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote: All Parkers are foam-filled under the deck. As they are linerless boats, there's no foam in the hullsides. But there's enough foam injected to keep the boat afloat. Under 20 feet, the Coast Guard requires that they must be rated for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower capacity limits. They are also required to have built-in flotation. Boats over 20 feet long are not subject to standards for passenger, gear and maximum horsepower and have no flotation requirements. So? Just saying - not making any kind of point at all. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 9:07 am, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 10, 8:29 am, HK wrote: Teak floats. Eisboch Indeed.- - Not according to the CG;) Relax. It was a joke. Eisboch I was kidding, thus the ";)" after the comment. But for the record, when designing a boat under 20 feet, you can not include the wood parts in your flotation calculations. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:52:47 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:39:39 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:39:40 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:36:54 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Side view: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...-08-080001.jpg !! You didn't go for the aluminum trailer ?? Of course I did. But I won't be able to pick it up in Norfolk until Saturday or Monday. The trailer you see is one of the dealer's yard trailers. When new boats come in, they have to be stashed on something. Tri-State uses cradles or trailers to prop up its new boats. Are you getting yours from S&S? I drove to Norfolk to pick up mine.... Yup. Wanna meet me for lunch end of next week? I'm supposed to pick it up either Saturday the 18th or Monday. Maybe we could pick up a charter in Virginia Beach. I believe I'll be kinda footloose the end of next week with my wife visiting her maternal grandma in western North Carolina. That would be Saturday the 18th or the following Monday. Where will you be? Will you be cruising west toward granny? Monday is the first day of classes.... no way I'll get out of that.... Yikes. I guess I worded that...poorly. No, I will not be cruising west towards granny. My wife's annual trips to granny's house are a henfest, with the convergence of a number of female relatives. Granny, by the way, is 100 years old this year. She's a very healthy, active lady. Great for the old girl! I hope to be spry and sassy past 100, too! On Saturday, the 18th, hopefully, I will be cruising down to Norfolk to pick up the trailer. But I won't know until Friday the 17th. That's when the trailer is supposed to arrive there. If it isn't there for pickup on the 18th, I'll be driving down on Monday the 20th. Let me know how your plans evolve. S&S isn't very easy to find. I remember them at the end of a short gravel drive, with an aircraft carrier looming over the neighborhood. Actually, they're on the other side now. They moved a few years ago. Much easier to find. Near the airport and the botanic gardens. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...S-trailers.jpg |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:03:04 -0500, John H. wrote: Harry, in the pictures on the Parker site, http://www.parkerboats.net/pages/boa...l.jsp?boatid=2 it appears that the 21'er is the same as the 23'er without the engine mount. Why would you get a boat that has no protection from the water coming thru the transom? Hell, even the 18'er appears to have the engine mounted in such a way as to keep the water out. Come on guys - it's a nice boat. It's not what some of us would buy for any number of reasons, but that's Harry's choice, not ours. Picking on that one detail seems kind of petty. SWS, I have to disagree with you, this thread really has been a very productive discussion about boats. No has called Harry's boat a piece of **** (like Harry has done many times about other people's boats), no has called called Harry an asshole or accused Harry about lying about his Parker. In fact, even though Harry loves to call other people names, it looks like most people try to ignore his insults and focused on a very legitimate boating discussion. What I saw is someone who had ridden in the Parker making an observation about the his ride in the Parker, and then a general discussion about an open transom very a transom with a engine well or splash boards. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:25:25 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Ask Wayne B. about the amount of flotation in his trawler. Teak floats. Just like a rock. Those 3,000 lb Detroit Diesels should help to keep it afloat however. :-) The GB also has about 60 inches of freeboard at the transom, self draining deck with large scuppers, and a great deal of protection from down flooding. Just what you'd want in a serious coastal and near shore cruiser. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote:
How about if you broach and take a few tons of water over the side, or if you suffer a knockdown? Got enough flotation built into that boat to keep it floating level and safe until help arrives? It depends. :-) After watching those Alaskan fishing boats capsize in big seas I think it's safe to say that no boat is without risk in extreme conditions. Don't take my comments personally, not intended that way. Accidental (and abrupt) sinking is a proven issue on boats with low transom freeboard and no splash boards however. There are lots of ways for a boat to accidently end up stern-to with a breaking wave, and the wave doesn't have to be all that big with 12 inches of freeboard. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
|
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:23:19 -0400, HK wrote:
It's not an issue, except maybe to inexperienced ocean boaters. That's debatable. Even experienced boaters sometimes snag a lobster pot or foul an anchor line. That's how some of the "stern-to-the-wave" incidents that I've heard about developed. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 11:26 am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:21:40 -0000, wrote: Buying a boat withougt flotation, is like buying an aeroplane with no wings. Commercial vessel maybe, but a passenger vessel with no flotation, if you sink, you deserve it. After a certain size and weight positive flotation becomes virtually impossible, typically in the low to mid 20 ft range depending on power options and construction. Yeah, I can't imagine trying to put flotation in my friends tug. There would be no room for anything else I guess;) I always forget to qualify my posts as from a 20 foot boaters point of view. The explanation of your vessel's ability to preserve itself, and Harrys explanation of his seem logical for the type of vessels, and intended use from what I can see, again with the limited pov. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:34:25 -0400, HK wrote: How about if you broach and take a few tons of water over the side, or if you suffer a knockdown? Got enough flotation built into that boat to keep it floating level and safe until help arrives? It depends. :-) After watching those Alaskan fishing boats capsize in big seas I think it's safe to say that no boat is without risk in extreme conditions. Don't take my comments personally, not intended that way. Accidental (and abrupt) sinking is a proven issue on boats with low transom freeboard and no splash boards however. There are lots of ways for a boat to accidently end up stern-to with a breaking wave, and the wave doesn't have to be all that big with 12 inches of freeboard. There are lots of ways for every boat to founder. I've been boating in small, low transom boats for 50 years. Never had a close call via a wave breaking over the transom. Did have a close call with a wave breaking over the bow. Since I do 90% of my boating in Chesapeake Bay, I have no concerns about the transom. And even when I wander offshore, it isn't a concern for me. I've been offshore plenty of times in boats with 15" transoms, including some of the older Boston Whalers. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:33:34 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:23:19 -0400, HK wrote: It's not an issue, except maybe to inexperienced ocean boaters. That's debatable. Even experienced boaters sometimes snag a lobster pot or foul an anchor line. That's how some of the "stern-to-the-wave" incidents that I've heard about developed. Been there, done that. In particular in and around The Race where the lobsta men have these ridiculously long leads on their traps and bouys and love to place them right where the best striper fishing is. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:23:19 -0400, HK wrote: It's not an issue, except maybe to inexperienced ocean boaters. That's debatable. Even experienced boaters sometimes snag a lobster pot or foul an anchor line. That's how some of the "stern-to-the-wave" incidents that I've heard about developed. That's why I always carry and keep handy a stout, sharp knife. Of course, if you snagged a 1" anchor line with chain in the GB while in a nasty storm, you'd have to lean pretty far over the transom to cut yourself free. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:39:10 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:52:47 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:39:39 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: HK wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:39:40 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:36:54 -0400, HK penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Side view: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...-08-080001.jpg !! You didn't go for the aluminum trailer ?? Of course I did. But I won't be able to pick it up in Norfolk until Saturday or Monday. The trailer you see is one of the dealer's yard trailers. When new boats come in, they have to be stashed on something. Tri-State uses cradles or trailers to prop up its new boats. Are you getting yours from S&S? I drove to Norfolk to pick up mine.... Yup. Wanna meet me for lunch end of next week? I'm supposed to pick it up either Saturday the 18th or Monday. Maybe we could pick up a charter in Virginia Beach. I believe I'll be kinda footloose the end of next week with my wife visiting her maternal grandma in western North Carolina. That would be Saturday the 18th or the following Monday. Where will you be? Will you be cruising west toward granny? Monday is the first day of classes.... no way I'll get out of that.... Yikes. I guess I worded that...poorly. No, I will not be cruising west towards granny. My wife's annual trips to granny's house are a henfest, with the convergence of a number of female relatives. Granny, by the way, is 100 years old this year. She's a very healthy, active lady. Great for the old girl! I hope to be spry and sassy past 100, too! On Saturday, the 18th, hopefully, I will be cruising down to Norfolk to pick up the trailer. But I won't know until Friday the 17th. That's when the trailer is supposed to arrive there. If it isn't there for pickup on the 18th, I'll be driving down on Monday the 20th. Let me know how your plans evolve. S&S isn't very easy to find. I remember them at the end of a short gravel drive, with an aircraft carrier looming over the neighborhood. Actually, they're on the other side now. They moved a few years ago. Much easier to find. Near the airport and the botanic gardens. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...S-trailers.jpg Wow! They did move! Probably a lot better because they used to have sales in one place and storage in another..... They have a nice facility now. Decent building, right on the water, next to a decent marina. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:37:51 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:03:04 -0500, John H. wrote: Harry, in the pictures on the Parker site, http://www.parkerboats.net/pages/boa...l.jsp?boatid=2 it appears that the 21'er is the same as the 23'er without the engine mount. Why would you get a boat that has no protection from the water coming thru the transom? Hell, even the 18'er appears to have the engine mounted in such a way as to keep the water out. Come on guys - it's a nice boat. It's not what some of us would buy for any number of reasons, but that's Harry's choice, not ours. Picking on that one detail seems kind of petty. Shudder...... It reminded me of the old Skipper threads about "the dangerous Scout low transom." I always suggested to him that if he was afraid of getting wet he probably should give up boating....... I never could follow that "line of thought" of his... I think it is an issue with "inland" boaters who have no ocean experience. I suppose if I boated on a little lake, I'd be scared, too. I don't know what they use now, but when I was living near St. Augustine, the sheriff's surf rescue patrol used Carolina Skiff hulls as the basis of their surf retrieval boats. Not only do Carolina Skiffs have low transoms, they have low hullsides. You'd see these guys push out Matanzas Inlet and St. Augustine Inlet and pull swimmers out of six to eight foot breakers. Parker offers the cut down transom style on several of its 21, 23 and 25 footers. They have high appeal to *real* fishermen because they allow direct access to the body of water and fish right at the transom. I tell you, just about every time I see a "boating-related" post from certain of the guys here, I chuckle. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:41:51 -0400, HK wrote:
That's why I always carry and keep handy a stout, sharp knife. That's a good idea of course but there's always the issue of being able to get to the offending line in time to avoid a swamping. Someone on "rec.boats.cruising" recently reported that they had bought a knife attachment that fits on the end of those ubiquitous telescoping mop handles. I haven't bought one yet but it does seem like they could be useful for quickly cutting a submerged line. Our GB is heavy enough that we generally break off crab and lobster pot lines if we hit them, but then I have to dive overboard once in awhile to cut loose the debris on the shafts. I've always carried mask and flippers for that sort of thing but I've recently added a small dive compressor, weight belt, hose and regulator to the inventory. The big risk with larger boats is getting tangled up in floating fish nets or large polypropylene line. The big polypro stuff is strong enough to break a strut or pull out a shaft if you get really unlucky. When you walk along deserted beaches in the Bahamas you find it all over the place, big 1 inch lines and all kinds of professional fishing junk that has floated in. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:39:30 -0400, HK wrote:
I've been offshore plenty of times in boats with 15" transoms, including some of the older Boston Whalers. If you believe the ads, a Whaler will float after you cut it in two with a chain saw. Never tried it. :-) |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 12:01 pm, HK wrote:
I think it is an issue with "inland" boaters who have no ocean experience. I suppose if I boated on a little lake, I'd be scared, too. Hey, I resemble that comment, ceppn' I ain't skeeret o' no dihydromonoxide! |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:39:30 -0400, HK wrote: I've been offshore plenty of times in boats with 15" transoms, including some of the older Boston Whalers. If you believe the ads, a Whaler will float after you cut it in two with a chain saw. Never tried it. :-) I'd like to, but no one with a Whaler will allow me to get near it with my Sawzall. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
If you believe the ads, a Whaler will float after you cut it in two with a chain saw. Never tried it. :-) Whaler usually has an aft 1/2 of a boat motoring around at "in the water" boat shows so, yes, it can be done. I've only seen it in calm water though. Methinks it'd get a bit wet in a chop ;-) Rick |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:24:22 -0500, lid wrote:
Methinks it'd get a bit wet in a chop ;-) Wet is a *lot* better than submerged. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:24:22 -0500, lid wrote: Methinks it'd get a bit wet in a chop ;-) Wet is a *lot* better than submerged. What is it with these folks who think that one should remain perfectly dry in a boat? Are they from Seattle, or something, where an ounce of spray causes hypothermia? |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:19:58 -0500, John H.
wrote: The other 100 hours was spent 'drift fishing' with the engine off. Give Harry a break. He's never given any reason to doubt his honesty. Has he? ============================== If you doubt a man's honesty, ask him. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
On Aug 10, 1:39 pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:24:22 -0500, wrote: Methinks it'd get a bit wet in a chop ;-) Wet is a *lot* better than submerged. Yeah, but in the real world, if a whaler were in pieces, it probably was not cut nicely in half with a keen blade. I am envisioning sharp torn edges of metal and fiberglass, rolling in the chop, trying to drag you under. Don't know if I would want to stick around for that. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:19:58 -0500, John H. wrote: The other 100 hours was spent 'drift fishing' with the engine off. Give Harry a break. He's never given any reason to doubt his honesty. Has he? ============================== If you doubt a man's honesty, ask him. Wayne, I have no doubt about Harry's honesty. |
Spawn of Yo Ho
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:19:58 -0500, John H. wrote: The other 100 hours was spent 'drift fishing' with the engine off. Give Harry a break. He's never given any reason to doubt his honesty. Has he? ============================== If you doubt a man's honesty, ask him. Ahh, I see Boatless Herring is "overinterpreting" one of my posts again to serve his purposes. He must sleep in the same bed as Reggie Retardo and the rest of the losers. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com