Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:23 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: What a hot topic for rec.boats, 2007. A 15th Century Turkish navigator produced a map that accurately depicted not only the not-yet officially "discovered" Atlantic coastlines of North and South America, but also the Antarctic continent in an ice- free state that last existed about 6000 years ago. Piri Reis claimed that some of the source material for his map came from the libraries of Alexander the Great, dating those documents to a time about 1800 years before Columbus sailed to the West Indies. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm Careful now, you are messing about with cherished beliefs, Italian-American pride, a holiday, and a three day weekend. :-) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:23 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: What a hot topic for rec.boats, 2007. A 15th Century Turkish navigator produced a map that accurately depicted not only the not-yet officially "discovered" Atlantic coastlines of North and South America, but also the Antarctic continent in an ice- free state that last existed about 6000 years ago. Piri Reis claimed that some of the source material for his map came from the libraries of Alexander the Great, dating those documents to a time about 1800 years before Columbus sailed to the West Indies. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm Careful now, you are messing about with cherished beliefs, Italian-American pride, a holiday, and a three day weekend. There is a local legend here on the Gulf Coast of a Welch Prince Madoc who landed on the shore of Mobile Bay in 1170. Intriguing clues exist, but no definitive proof. More info at www.Madoc1170.com. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 31, 6:39?pm, "William Bruce" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:23 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: What a hot topic for rec.boats, 2007. A 15th Century Turkish navigator produced a map that accurately depicted not only the not-yet officially "discovered" Atlantic coastlines of North and South America, but also the Antarctic continent in an ice- free state that last existed about 6000 years ago. Piri Reis claimed that some of the source material for his map came from the libraries of Alexander the Great, dating those documents to a time about 1800 years before Columbus sailed to the West Indies. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm Careful now, you are messing about with cherished beliefs, Italian-American pride, a holiday, and a three day weekend. There is a local legend here on the Gulf Coast of a Welch Prince Madoc who landed on the shore of Mobile Bay in 1170. Intriguing clues exist, but no definitive proof. More info atwww.Madoc1170.com.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah yes, the blue-eyed Indians of the Mississippi Valley. There is also interesting evidence for St Brendan, from Ireland. And it's a historic fact that codfish caught off Newfoundland were for sale in London decades before Columbus "discovered" the Western Hemisphere. Not entirely unrelated to what *really* happened to the settlers at Roanoake, Virginina. We were taught in our US history classes that "nobody knows" what became of the colonists who mysteriously disappeared while their supply ship returned to England. Nonsense. There is an "Indian tribe" on the East Coast where some of the Indians are blonde, many are blue-eyed, and their tribal history has stated very matter-of-factly and continuously for the last few hundred years that their ancestors were the original settlers at Roanoake. The settlers were cold and starving to death while they noticed the aboriginal communities around them enjoying relative abundance. It seemed perfectly logical to the suffering colonists that if they were to survive, let alone thrive, in this hostile new land they might be better off following the native ways than trying to live like Europeans. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 31, 6:39?pm, "William Bruce" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... I On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:13:23 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: What a hot topic for rec.boats, 2007. A 15th Century Turkish navigator produced a map that accurately depicted not only the not-yet officially "discovered" Atlantic coastlines of North and South America, but also the Antarctic continent in an ice- free state that last existed about 6000 years ago. Piri Reis claimed that some of the source material for his map came from the libraries of Alexander the Great, dating those documents to a time about 1800 years before Columbus sailed to the West Indies. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm Careful now, you are messing about with cherished beliefs, Italian-American pride, a holiday, and a three day weekend. There is a local legend here on the Gulf Coast of a Welch Prince Madoc who landed on the shore of Mobile Bay in 1170. Intriguing clues exist, but no definitive proof. More info atwww.Madoc1170.com.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah yes, the blue-eyed Indians of the Mississippi Valley. There is also interesting evidence for St Brendan, from Ireland. And it's a historic fact that codfish caught off Newfoundland were for sale in London decades before Columbus "discovered" the Western Hemisphere. Not entirely unrelated to what *really* happened to the settlers at Roanoake, Virginina. We were taught in our US history classes that "nobody knows" what became of the colonists who mysteriously disappeared while their supply ship returned to England. Nonsense. There is an "Indian tribe" on the East Coast where some of the Indians are blonde, many are blue-eyed, and their tribal history has stated very matter-of-factly and continuously for the last few hundred years that their ancestors were the original settlers at Roanoake. The settlers were cold and starving to death while they noticed the aboriginal communities around them enjoying relative abundance. It seemed perfectly logical to the suffering colonists that if they were to survive, let alone thrive, in this hostile new land they might be better off following the native ways than trying to live like Europeans. I prefer to think the native Americans realized right away that the European white man brought with him only disease, bad habits, a bizarre religion and the desire to conquer and kill everything that got in the way, and therefore they slaughtered the "settlers." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|