On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:35:57 -0700, Corsair23 wrote:



Yet along Superior's shores, boats can't reach many mooring sites
and
marina operators are begging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
dredge shallow harbors.

You can thank your "great" President for that....draining the lakes
"just" to keep the Mississippi high.

Didn't that rationale get dumped early on?
--
John H

John H. wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:35:57 -0700, Corsair23 wrote:



Yet along Superior's shores, boats can't reach many mooring sites
and
marina operators are begging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
dredge shallow harbors.

You can thank your "great" President for that....draining the lakes
"just" to keep the Mississippi high.


Didn't that rationale get dumped early on?

There is speculation that the Corp of Engineers is responsible for the
lake level drops to begin with. The St. Clair river was a "bottle neck"
for outflow from the upper Great Lakes. With the shipping channel
contantly being dredged, the "bottle neck" is no longer slowing the
outflow into Lake St. Clair and Lake Erie.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:44:25 -0400, animal05
wrote:

John H. wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:35:57 -0700, Corsair23 wrote:



Yet along Superior's shores, boats can't reach many mooring sites
and
marina operators are begging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
dredge shallow harbors.

You can thank your "great" President for that....draining the lakes
"just" to keep the Mississippi high.


Didn't that rationale get dumped early on?

There is speculation that the Corp of Engineers is responsible for the
lake level drops to begin with. The St. Clair river was a "bottle neck"
for outflow from the upper Great Lakes. With the shipping channel
contantly being dredged, the "bottle neck" is no longer slowing the
outflow into Lake St. Clair and Lake Erie.

Do you have any idea who directs and pays for work that is overseen by the
Corps? It's not the Corps.
--
John H