Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 28, 10:43 am, "D.Duck" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... On Jul 28, 10:03 am, wrote: On Jul 28, 9:45 am, HK wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:18:16 -0400, HK wrote: 2100CC Powered with? A Yamaha, of course. Four cycle 150 hp. I could have saved a bundle by buying one of those eTEC's from the guy near the boatyard on the side of the road selling them in boxes out of the back of his truck. :} ****, that was you?? I would have given you a bettter deal if you had you rec.boats sweatshirt on ![]() Ficht in the trunk! Oh, I forgot, "some assembly required". ![]() Are the batteries included?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Batteries?? Hey fella, I just sell em". .......Man, I better cut this out, it could be a tough afternoon ;( OK, I guess I could scrounge up the batteries. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:18:16 -0400, HK wrote:
NOYB wrote: What size and model did you choose for the new Parker? "HK" wrote in message ... ...sold. Our new Parker is "scheduled" to arrive week of 6 August. One of you here missed the boating deal of a lifetime. :} 2100CC That's a nice boat, Harry. I'm sure you're going to enjoy it. Another positive side is that a nice boater will be getting a "deal" 2 or 3 years from now on a barely used Parker 2100CC. ;-) |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
...sold. Our new Parker is "scheduled" to arrive week of 6 August. One of you here missed the boating deal of a lifetime. :} Congrats on doing your part to keep the boating industry chugging along. I've not been on-line much round here, but curious to know the reasoning behind the decision. Where you simply not using the bigger one as much as you initially thought? Costs to operate? Granted the used one was a deal for someone, I expect not everything you had into it you got out from it. I am also thinking of downsizing a bit to get into skinnier water than the current one allows. I mean I could go more places, but them stinkin seas grasses clog up the intake. No seriously, I've been observing and realized more and more it is myself and maybe one other for fishing, few times a year we take another couple or more for a ride. I figure let them get their own boat suffer a bit less of creature accommodations while I'd prefer a boat that truly suits my needs 90% of the time. |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DownTime wrote:
HK wrote: ...sold. Our new Parker is "scheduled" to arrive week of 6 August. One of you here missed the boating deal of a lifetime. :} Congrats on doing your part to keep the boating industry chugging along. I've not been on-line much round here, but curious to know the reasoning behind the decision. Where you simply not using the bigger one as much as you initially thought? Costs to operate? Granted the used one was a deal for someone, I expect not everything you had into it you got out from it. I am also thinking of downsizing a bit to get into skinnier water than the current one allows. I mean I could go more places, but them stinkin seas grasses clog up the intake. No seriously, I've been observing and realized more and more it is myself and maybe one other for fishing, few times a year we take another couple or more for a ride. I figure let them get their own boat suffer a bit less of creature accommodations while I'd prefer a boat that truly suits my needs 90% of the time. I bought the Parker a few years ago, with the hopes of going out fishing a lot with my wife. Alas, she's been involved academically for the last couple of years, and will be until late next spring. Most of my fishing buddies have other interests, too, so when I wanted to go fishing, at least half the time I was doing it solo. I could launch and retrieve the boat on the ramp okay by myself, but then I was facing the scrub-down, the removal of gear, the whole catastrophe, as it were. Also, trailering that boat any distance required time in planning and effort that made it more trouble than it was worth. So, I decided to sell the Parker. Once I got serious about selling the boat, it took about 3-1/2 weeks to find her a new home. The new owner and I both made out well on the sale. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:36:14 -0400, HK wrote:
DownTime wrote: HK wrote: ...sold. Our new Parker is "scheduled" to arrive week of 6 August. One of you here missed the boating deal of a lifetime. :} Congrats on doing your part to keep the boating industry chugging along. I've not been on-line much round here, but curious to know the reasoning behind the decision. Where you simply not using the bigger one as much as you initially thought? Costs to operate? Granted the used one was a deal for someone, I expect not everything you had into it you got out from it. I am also thinking of downsizing a bit to get into skinnier water than the current one allows. I mean I could go more places, but them stinkin seas grasses clog up the intake. No seriously, I've been observing and realized more and more it is myself and maybe one other for fishing, few times a year we take another couple or more for a ride. I figure let them get their own boat suffer a bit less of creature accommodations while I'd prefer a boat that truly suits my needs 90% of the time. I bought the Parker a few years ago, with the hopes of going out fishing a lot with my wife. Alas, she's been involved academically for the last couple of years, and will be until late next spring. Most of my fishing buddies have other interests, too, so when I wanted to go fishing, at least half the time I was doing it solo. I could launch and retrieve the boat on the ramp okay by myself, but then I was facing the scrub-down, the removal of gear, the whole catastrophe, as it were. Also, trailering that boat any distance required time in planning and effort that made it more trouble than it was worth. So, I decided to sell the Parker. Once I got serious about selling the boat, it took about 3-1/2 weeks to find her a new home. The new owner and I both made out well on the sale. You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. -- John H |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H." wrote in message ... You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. -- John H That's a laugh. You were the one who stuck his nose up in the air when Harry offered to take you out on Yo Ho. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:36:14 -0400, HK wrote: DownTime wrote: HK wrote: ...sold. Our new Parker is "scheduled" to arrive week of 6 August. One of you here missed the boating deal of a lifetime. :} Congrats on doing your part to keep the boating industry chugging along. I've not been on-line much round here, but curious to know the reasoning behind the decision. Where you simply not using the bigger one as much as you initially thought? Costs to operate? Granted the used one was a deal for someone, I expect not everything you had into it you got out from it. I am also thinking of downsizing a bit to get into skinnier water than the current one allows. I mean I could go more places, but them stinkin seas grasses clog up the intake. No seriously, I've been observing and realized more and more it is myself and maybe one other for fishing, few times a year we take another couple or more for a ride. I figure let them get their own boat suffer a bit less of creature accommodations while I'd prefer a boat that truly suits my needs 90% of the time. I bought the Parker a few years ago, with the hopes of going out fishing a lot with my wife. Alas, she's been involved academically for the last couple of years, and will be until late next spring. Most of my fishing buddies have other interests, too, so when I wanted to go fishing, at least half the time I was doing it solo. I could launch and retrieve the boat on the ramp okay by myself, but then I was facing the scrub-down, the removal of gear, the whole catastrophe, as it were. Also, trailering that boat any distance required time in planning and effort that made it more trouble than it was worth. So, I decided to sell the Parker. Once I got serious about selling the boat, it took about 3-1/2 weeks to find her a new home. The new owner and I both made out well on the sale. You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. Once, maybe. Unless you know another hard core union Democrat suffering from narcissism. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. -- John H That's a laugh. You were the one who stuck his nose up in the air when Harry offered to take you out on Yo Ho. I don't know why, but bringing herring aboard on a fishing trip probably is like bringing a banana aboard...bad luck, bad joss, bad karma. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:47:07 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. -- John H That's a laugh. You were the one who stuck his nose up in the air when Harry offered to take you out on Yo Ho. Don, read it over...I didn't say *I* would have gone with him! -- John H |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:47:07 -0300, "Don White"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . You should have given me a shout. I could have found someone to go fishing with you. -- John H That's a laugh. You were the one who stuck his nose up in the air when Harry offered to take you out on Yo Ho. BTW, how's your mom doing? Hope all is well.. And, how was your weekend trip? Did you win the race, or did I misunderstand the intent of the trip? -- John H |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|