In article , jherring1
@yahoo.com says...
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:16:17 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Jul 12, 8:50?am, wrote:


But there is no proof of "lies and hubris", no convictions, only
anecdotal web blogs encouraged and paid for by groups like the Soros
organization, DNC, One World, ACLU, NAMBLA, and various other fringe
activist groups. But like your lies about O, no real proof, just
daydreams and made up stories...


I think we agree on something, justafreakin. It can be disastrous to
accept unproven spin as a basis for opinion, and even more disastrous
to use it as a basis for defining policy. We probably shouldn't listen
to anybody with a partisan agenda or financial interest in one version
of the truth vs. another. Any suggestions concerning where we should
turn for completely unbiased reporting devoid of partisan influence
and editorializing?


Yeah, Fox News. At least you'll hear two sides. And, you'll hear things
that never make the major media.

If you don't want editorializing, don't listen to O'Reilly, Hannity,
Colmes, etc. Just stick with the news. Brit Hume provides a pretty balanced
news report.

Yes, unless you listen to the complete spectrum of news. Then you
easily detect how Hume reinforces the Republican talking points of the
day.

He regularly walks people into these talking points quite adroitly.

And you don't hear two sides. You hear conservative and conservative
light.

jps