On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:46:43 -0700, jps wrote:

In article .com,
says...


And now that I have had a chance to read some of these links, I see
nothing but what you have here on rec.boats. Lots of sensational
accusations, with nothing backing any of them up.. I am getting tired
of reading fairy stories.

Here's proof that he's a ****ing cocksucker...

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/07/22/...emy_glick_agai
n.php

O'REILLY: But who is this guy, really? Well, on this program, Glick
said President [George W.] Bush and his father [former President George
H.W. Bush] were responsible for his [Glick's] father's death. He said
George W. Bush pulled off a coup to get elected. He implied the U.S.A.
itself was a terrorist nation. And he called his father's death at the
hands of an Al Qaeda "alleged assassination." He said America itself was
responsible for the 9-11 attack because it is an imperialistic, aggressive
nation. Glick was dismissed from The Factor because he was completely off
the wall. Security actually had to take the guy out of the building, he was
that out of control.

Glick never said "President Bush and his father were responsible for his
[Glick's] father's death." What Glick did say, on the February 4, 2003,
edition of The O'Reilly Factor, was the following: "[O]ur current president
now inherited a legacy from his father and inherited a political legacy
that's responsible for training militarily, economically, and situating
geopolitically the parties involved in the alleged assassination and the
murder of my father and countless of thousands of others."

Isn't it strange that only *one* of the statements made by O'Reilly is
rebutted?

Now, how is that Whaler holding up? Do you find it to be a rough riding
boat?
--
John H