On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge? ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge?
;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.


Nice spin. ;-)

On Jul 11, 4:24?pm, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge?
;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.

Nice spin. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nice short reply :-)

(A factual defense does tend to put a cork in criticism).

Have a wonderful evening.

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 11, 4:24?pm, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

groups.com...

On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did
they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth"
beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have
no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished
by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean
to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge?
;-)- Hide quoted text -



My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.

Nice spin. ;-)



Nice short reply :-)


Thanks. To the point and factual. I can give you some training on doing
so if you wish. ;-)



Have a wonderful evening.


Will do. You also!

In article , "JimH" ask
says...

Nice short reply :-)


Thanks. To the point and factual. I can give you some training on doing
so if you wish. ;-)

Chuck,

You really should jump at the chance. He can teach you the finer points
of netcoping for sure.

jps

On Jul 11, 7:18 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jul 11, 10:52?am, "JimH" ask wrote:





"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode.

Hey Chuck.......what happened to your "No Politcal Postings" pledge? ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My posting isn't political in any way. It's a request for jps to
*stop* confrontational political posting and an observation that the
rancor created by political posts is destructive. How the heck is that
political?
Does a statement that we should work together to try to solve common
problems serve only one side of the political spectrum? Darn tragic,
if that's the case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You noted the problems attributed to the current administration, you
do not make mistakes like that.. c'mon Chuck, it was a troll...